Discussion:Mobile Homes
From TaxAlmanac, A Free Online Resource for Tax Professionals
Note: You are using this website at your own risk, subject to our Disclaimer and Website Use and Contribution Terms.
From TaxAlmanac
(Difference between revisions)
| Revision as of 17:14, 5 December 2005 Hubert Altman (Talk | contribs) ← Previous diff |
Revision as of 23:50, 23 September 2008 Sheldon (Talk | contribs) (mobile home rental 27.5 year property???) Next diff → |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| {{ForumReplyPost|UserID=Hubert Altman|Date=5 December 2005|Text=I would take the life expectancy straight line.}} | {{ForumReplyPost|UserID=Hubert Altman|Date=5 December 2005|Text=I would take the life expectancy straight line.}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{ForumReplyPost|UserID=Sheldon|Date=23 September 2008|Text=I was looking at this again today, as I have used a shorter life expectancy before. TheTaxBook has a depreciation table that says under 27.5 year property that it includes mobile homes, so I presume that they saw this specified in some guidance, but I am not certain where it would be. If anyone has references to authority that a shorter life expectancy can be used instead of this, I would appreciate it. It seems like it might make a difference if treated as realty under local law, like if a permanent foundation is in place. Colorado treats mobile homes as personal property, so it seems like that would be a factor in favor of using a shorter useful life. If anyone has further information it would be appreciated.}} | ||
Revision as of 23:50, 23 September 2008
Discussion Forum Index --> Tax Questions --> Mobile Homes
| 4 December 2005 | |
| Client bought a mobile home in an owner owned park. He intends renting the mobile home for the winter season (will be empty the rest of the year), will manage the property himself. Question is what depreciation table is used for a mobile home? The land value is about 45,000 and the mobile home itself is valued at 50,000. Does this go under the 27 year depreciation even though the life expectancy of the mobile home is only 10-15 years? | |
Hubert Altman (talk|edits) said: | 5 December 2005 |
| I would take the life expectancy straight line. | |
| 23 September 2008 | |
| I was looking at this again today, as I have used a shorter life expectancy before. TheTaxBook has a depreciation table that says under 27.5 year property that it includes mobile homes, so I presume that they saw this specified in some guidance, but I am not certain where it would be. If anyone has references to authority that a shorter life expectancy can be used instead of this, I would appreciate it. It seems like it might make a difference if treated as realty under local law, like if a permanent foundation is in place. Colorado treats mobile homes as personal property, so it seems like that would be a factor in favor of using a shorter useful life. If anyone has further information it would be appreciated. | |
