Discussion:EA Exam
From TaxAlmanac
| Revision as of 17:13, 9 December 2007 Southparkcpa (Talk | contribs) (Mike Not sure w) ← Previous diff |
Revision as of 18:01, 9 December 2007 Gmikeg (Talk | contribs) (My cousin got he) Next diff → |
||
| Line 141: | Line 141: | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{ForumReplyPost|UserID=Gmikeg|Date=9 December 2007|Text=My cousin got her accounting degree from CW Post (small world). Nice friggin school! | ||
| + | |||
| + | I got Bus Law I already, great course! My Intermediate Accounting book is sitting on the shelf. I might just sit down and crack it open... | ||
| + | |||
| + | By the way; what's '''BS''' and '''P''' and '''L'''? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Thanks, | ||
| + | |||
| + | Mike}} | ||
Revision as of 18:01, 9 December 2007
Discussion Forum Index --> Tax Questions --> EA Exam
Rgtaxservice (talk|edits) said: | 29 April 2007 |
| Now the fun really begins. I've started to study and pre-test for the EA Exam. I'm using the Gleim Study guides. I haven't scheduled the exam yet. I figure late summer or mid fall. I want to allow myself the time to study and learn.
I'll use this study time to reflect and find my 'inner tax practitioner'. | |
Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said: | 29 April 2007 |
| Good luck! | |
Rgtaxservice (talk|edits) said: | 29 April 2007 |
| Thanks D&T. I've been wanting to take this exam for a while now. It's a personal goal to me. It's another rung on the ladder.
Unlike CPA, most people (clients) don't know what EA stands for. Enrolled is easy, but once you utter the word Agent people tend to couple it with IRS and the room gets very quiet. You can see the wheel turning in their heads as they think you are and IRS Agent...and they just mentioned 'off the books'. With any luck, a few of my problem clients will either be scared straight or take a hike. | |
Bottom Line (talk|edits) said: | 29 April 2007 |
| It's been so long since I studied (and I never really studied then) that it will be hard for me to get into the swing of it. I also am planning on sitting for the EA. I'm going to take a few classes this summer and begin studying with the goal of taking the test next summer. | |
Rgtaxservice (talk|edits) said: | 29 April 2007 |
| Although I've just started my study routine, I find that the Gleim study guide is very helpful. Just based on the short period that I've been using it, I would recommend it.
I spent $270 for the books and test cd (3 parts). I opted out of the online option...it's the same as the CD minus the online counselor. | |
Actionbsns (talk|edits) said: | 29 April 2007 |
| Rg, your mention of the IRS and Agent, reminds me of a story. I had just finished my exams and had been awarded the EA when we met some family members and their friends in Las Vegas. We were all sitting around having dinner at a restaurant when one of the friends started talking about retiring and selling his store. He was full of bravado and himself and was making comments that would make any IRS agent just itch to get in and take a bette look. In a lull in his verbocity, my husband said to him "Paula's an enrolled agent with the IRS." You never saw someone go redder, and become more quiet so fast in your life. There was a very pregnant pause at the table and then the noisy guy blustered that "IRS agents ought to be required to let people know they are present!!!" He didn't have much more to say on the topic the rest of the evening.
Good luck with your studying and with the test. | |
Bottom Line (talk|edits) said: | 29 April 2007 |
| Now that's funny!! | |
| 29 April 2007 | |
| I took the EA tests last November & passed all 3. I used the Gleim CD's & books also. Mostly they were very good. I found that business study guides were right in sync with the tests but that the personal were quite as good. . I remember on the personal test there were several questions about insurance trusts that I did not have a clue. Just an FYI & good luck. | |
| 29 April 2007 | |
| Go to the Thomson Prometric website, register, and download the recommended reading/study list. Read EVERY pub listed in addition to taking a class (or self-study book).
The new test does not rely on the old test - all of the questions are new, though some may be similar. The old questions were written by IRS employees. The new questions were written by practicing EAs who want you to have a certain level of competency before admitting you to the tax expert "club". | |
| 30 April 2007 | |
| I took the exams in November and passed all 3. I found the NATP course to be quite helpful. I did not find the test terrible difficult. | |
Rgtaxservice (talk|edits) said: | 2 May 2007 |
| I'm finding that the study guides are working quite well. I seem to make stupid mistakes on items that I know and misread the question or read too much into the question. The answer review is really helps in strengthening my knowledge on why I got it right, and pointing to my erred ways when I don't.
All in all it's staring to get fun (isn't that sick?). Well, it's back to books - Rick | |
| 2 May 2007 | |
| Yes RICK...you are definitely SICK. Do you also read the Master Tax Guide for fun? hehehehe | |
Hellothere (talk|edits) said: | 2 May 2007 |
| I passed the exam by using the materials from the Phoenix Tax Group. The study cards were very helpful since I was able to carry them around with me and study whenever I had a minute.
Good luck with your studies!!! | |
| 16 November 2007 | |
| Has anyone recently purchased WiseGuides?
I found that the 3rd part contains comparatively less questions than the other two. The 3rd part has just 186 questions in total, when the second part has over 400 (not the book it self, but the software). Does it mean that the third part is not that difficult? (I wish!)Or if my version contains an error? I past the first and second parts recently, which were not that bad. I think that the WiseGuide helped a lot. I am taking the third part next week, and I feel completely lost since I don't have any experience in this area. | |
TheTinCook (talk|edits) said: | 16 November 2007 |
| The third section covers less material for sure. If you passed parts one and two, you should have no problem passing part three. You also might want to broaden your reading with Pub 594 and Pub 556.
The trickiest part for me was figuring out all the SOLs for refunds. | |
Donniecastleman (talk|edits) said: | 16 November 2007 |
| I had really good luck with Lambers EA review by Arthur Reed, passed all 4 parts the first time (isn't it three parts now?) so it may be worth checking out if you have the time, anyway I have to give credit where credit is due. Good luck with the exam, I should have done the EA thing years ago instead of waiting until 2005. | |
| 16 November 2007 | |
| I used WiseGuides & passed all 4 parts with flying colors the first time. But that was before they changed the test. | |
TheTinCook (talk|edits) said: | 25 November 2007 |
| Congrats Sarami! | |
Inagpurwala (talk|edits) said: | 26 November 2007 |
| Passed 1st and 3rd part in one try. I will try 2nd part second time next month (December 2007).Inagpurwala 17:37, 26 November 2007 (CST) | |
| 28 November 2007 | |
| I had good luck with NATP online course. I took the exam last summer and passed all four parts. (I was really surprised!) Good luck because your brain will hurt until after you take the exam! | |
Vermontcpa (talk|edits) said: | 29 November 2007 |
| Taking the EA exam (individuals) next week.. any words of wisdom on overly weighted areas to prepare for? I am using the Gleim program to prepare. | |
| 29 November 2007 | |
| That section should be the easiest of the three assuming that you have done 1040 tax returns including schedules A, B, C, and D. I would think that you would want to know about alimony recapture, wash sales, filing status, refundable and non-refundable credits, AMT, SE tax and the computation for SE HI and retirement plans for the SE'ed. Probably stuff that you have already seen in real life.
EA Subject Matter Experts are currently writing some new questions as Prometric will rotate the question pool.
| |
| 29 November 2007 | |
| Passed both. CPA exam is significantly hardly in that it covers a broader range of items for testing. | |
| 29 November 2007 | |
| "significantly hardly" - let's try "significantly harder" :) | |
Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said: | 29 November 2007 |
| You should not say that, Think Tax! Kevin is back to defend the honor of us (we?)(them?) EAs. | |
| 29 November 2007 | |
| No, I wanted an honest opinion.
If the EA exam is so easy, I would think that a CPA could challenge it without having to study. If the CPA exam were easy, there would be a lot more CPAs. Both are difficult. I wanted an opinion of "here's how they are different" and "here's how they were the same". | |
Johnhuddleston (talk|edits) said: | 29 November 2007 |
| Is there value in having both?
John Huddleston Seattle Bellevue Tax Accountant | |
| 29 November 2007 | |
| I have taken and passed both (except Auditing which I am retaking tomorrow). If we are talking about the whole exam than the CPA is harder hands down. Mainly because it covers a much larger amount of material: economics, IT, Cost Accounting, GAAP etc etc....if we mean on tax than the EA had more diffecult tax questions than did the CPA regulation section. Tax is just 60% of one section of a four section test. CPA exam is a mile wide and an inch deep. The EA was only a quarter mile wide but a lot deeper. | |
| 29 November 2007 | |
| So if you are taking the CPA exam you had better be prepared for a long walk, but if you are taking the EA exam you had better know how to swim? | |
Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said: | 29 November 2007 |
| I only wish I had copies of the questions for the years I passed the EA Exam; I think it was 1983 and 1994 but am not sure. I'd be curious to see what was included then and now.
Wonderful analogy, Kevin!!! | |
| 30 November 2007 | |
| Neither exam is "easy." The EA exam certainly drills deeper into the tax arena than does the CPA exam. The CPA exam, of course, deals with areas in which a tax accountant does not practice (nor cares to practice), e.g., auditing & fiancial reporting. I was a tax manager at a CPA firm as an EA long before I was a CPA (which is recently). The only reason I even took the CPA exam was for marketability.
Interestingly, from the recent stats I've read, the section of the CPA exam that has the lowest pass rate is REG (Regulations) which contains federal taxation. I always stay away from the we/them controversy. To me, it boils down to the person and not the credentials. I know CPAs and EAs who are absolutely brilliant. I also know CPAs and EAs that, for the life of me, I don't know how they could even pass a driving test. | |
Vermontcpa (talk|edits) said: | 8 December 2007 |
| passed individuals yesterday.. 3 1/2 hours is a ton of time to complete this!.. i was out in under 2 hrs.. taking part 3 the end of the month... | |
Southparkcpa (talk|edits) said: | 8 December 2007 |
| Way back in the mid eighties during trainging at PW (Pre PWC) we discussed the ranking of importance in skills, they called it GAAP, GAAS, TAX.
GAAP was rated number one and the logic is you can't apply tax or audit work to a transaction you don't understand. A capital lease is a perfect example. You can syudy it all dau long but simply miss it when preparing a tax return. Thus whether you are a CPA or EA is arguably secondary to your ability to understand business transactions and people. Not sure what's on the EA exam but I agree with Thinktax, I have met many awesome tax pro's both CPA's and EA's and many knuckleheads who were CPA's and EA's. Think about this theory, if you are on TA a few times a week, you are at a minimum curious abot your profession. More than likely you enjoy the profession. That is what helps build skill. I have had several CPA's work for me that were not intuitively curious, received all their training from mandated CPE and their compensation showed it. | |
| 9 December 2007 | |
| Nice work Vermontcpa! Had the pleasure of taking the last written test in 2005 in Albuquerque, NM. Just one question that I have for all CPAs that later get their EA: Why? I'm not doubting your desire to expand your horizons, but did you learn a lot of new stuff studying for the EA exam. (I'm not a CPA, just EA)
Also in response to SouthParkcpa; I've been an EA since April '06, and love the challenges of the profession. Met many EAs that don't know jack about tax law, and a few CPAs where I needed to fix there work. I know basic accounting (took I and II), but I don't know jack about GAAP. Do you think I could get a lot out of it? Let me know... Thanks, Mike G.,EA | |
Southparkcpa (talk|edits) said: | 9 December 2007 |
| Mike
Not sure why a CPA would take the EA but it's like good soup, Can never hurt! That said........ My practice and focuses on businesses and their owners with sales between 1 mil and 10 mil. As such, whether I like it or not I am confronted with consolidations, mergers, sales, new partners, LP's strange bank financing etc... My favorite saying is that 70 percent of what I do can be done by a 2nd year guy. The other 30 percent is the tough part. Meaning, as you grow, you will be confronted with issues you can't avoid. The last 3 years in my practice have been spent ridding ourselves of work we shouldn't do (small 1040's and corps, write up, local tax work etc...). In my experience, the 3 classes I highly recommend is Intermediate I and II for the more in depth review of the BS and P and L and Business law I. Contract and employment law are key in my view to good tax work. This is just one opinion. By the way, I am originally from Long Island as well. My masters is from CW Post. Matt | |
| 9 December 2007 | |
| My cousin got her accounting degree from CW Post (small world). Nice friggin school!
I got Bus Law I already, great course! My Intermediate Accounting book is sitting on the shelf. I might just sit down and crack it open... By the way; what's BS and P and L? Thanks, Mike | |


