Discussion:Do you like the new Discussion Forums?
From TaxAlmanac, A Free Online Resource for Tax Professionals
Note: You are using this website at your own risk, subject to our Disclaimer and Website Use and Contribution Terms.
From TaxAlmanac
(Difference between revisions)
| Revision as of 21:26, 21 November 2005 Taxlady1038 (Talk | contribs) ← Previous diff |
Revision as of 23:17, 22 November 2005 DianeOffutt (Talk | contribs) Next diff → |
||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
| {{ForumReplyPost|UserID=Taxlady1038|Date=21 November 2005|Text=There are pluses and minuses to both systems, but I suspect this format will work fine in this context. It can be really hard to follow in the "chatterbox cafe" when Prairie Home Companion is on live and a lot of people contribute at once.}} | {{ForumReplyPost|UserID=Taxlady1038|Date=21 November 2005|Text=There are pluses and minuses to both systems, but I suspect this format will work fine in this context. It can be really hard to follow in the "chatterbox cafe" when Prairie Home Companion is on live and a lot of people contribute at once.}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{ForumReplyPost|UserID=DianeOffutt|Date=22 November 2005|Text=Absolutely wonderful. Thank you.}} | ||
Revision as of 23:17, 22 November 2005
Discussion Forum Index --> Tax Questions --> Do you like the new Discussion Forums?
| 17 November 2005 | |
| This discussion forum system was just added to TaxAlmanac yesterday, and we intend to improve it over time. We're very interested in your feedback. Do you like the discussion system so far? Was it easy or difficult to use? Do you have any suggestions for improvements? Simply reply to this discussion and let us know what you think.
Thank you! Tim Doyle, TaxAlmanac Moderator | |
| 18 November 2005 | |
| Good idea, RLW! I'll add that to our list of feature requests and see what we can do.
Anyone else have any suggestions? Thanks! Tim Doyle, TaxAlmanac Moderator, Tdoyle 14:35, 18 November 2005 (CST) | |
| 18 November 2005 | |
| I like the the way that all the replies to a discussion follow each other. I just checked Quickfinders and it is a pain to follow a thread, especially if someone replies to a reply. | |
| 18 November 2005 | |
| Mactax: That's great feedback, thank you. We decided to go for the simple approach and not allow for the more complex threading approach (where users can reply to any post in the thread). That type of discussion can be difficult and confusing to follow sometimes. If you can think of anything else, please let me know - we want to make it even better.
Thanks! Tim | |
Jec56@rcn.com (talk|edits) said: | 21 November 2005 |
| need a way to search if question has been asked before and the answers received. | |
Taxlady1038 (talk|edits) said: | 21 November 2005 |
| There are pluses and minuses to both systems, but I suspect this format will work fine in this context. It can be really hard to follow in the "chatterbox cafe" when Prairie Home Companion is on live and a lot of people contribute at once. | |
DianeOffutt (talk|edits) said: | 22 November 2005 |
| Absolutely wonderful. Thank you. | |
