Discussion:Divorce settlment payments

From TaxAlmanac, A Free Online Resource for Tax Professionals
Note: You are using this website at your own risk, subject to our Disclaimer and Website Use and Contribution Terms.

From TaxAlmanac

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 22:56, 9 November 2007
Death&Taxes (Talk | contribs)
(You've got it...)
← Previous diff
Revision as of 00:18, 10 November 2007
Bengoshi (Talk | contribs)
(Swonder, not sur)
Next diff →
Line 12: Line 12:
{{ForumReplyPost|UserID=Death&Taxes|Date=9 November 2007|Text=You've got it....this has been so since 1983 or 1984, I believe. }} {{ForumReplyPost|UserID=Death&Taxes|Date=9 November 2007|Text=You've got it....this has been so since 1983 or 1984, I believe. }}
 +
 +{{ForumReplyPost|UserID=Bengoshi|Date=10 November 2007|Text=Swonder, not sure what you mean about "basis of 100k or 550k." I believe (but not totally certain) that regardless of what ex-husband pays ex-wife for her share of the investment property, his basis will be the carryover basis of $100,000. See IRC 1041 and related Treasury Regs. }}

Revision as of 00:18, 10 November 2007

Discussion Forum Index --> Advanced Tax Questions --> Divorce settlment payments
Discussion Forum Index --> Tax Questions --> Divorce settlment payments

Swonder (talk|edits) said:

9 November 2007
I have a client who is making divorce settlement payments to his ex for investment property which they jointly own. Does the payments to his ex increase his basis in the property?

Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said:

9 November 2007
No, see Sec. 1041-transfers between spouses incident to divorce are tax free. the question of any interest paid on the acquisition is another topic!

Swonder (talk|edits) said:

9 November 2007
So if the ex spouse had basis, her basis would then transfer to him, thus increasing his overall basis, right?

Swonder (talk|edits) said:

9 November 2007
For example:

If they had an investment property jointly while married costing 100k, then upon divorce he pays her 500k for her 1/2 interest then he would then have a basis of 100k or 550k (1/2 of 100k plus the 500k)

Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said:

9 November 2007
You've got it....this has been so since 1983 or 1984, I believe.

Bengoshi (talk|edits) said:

10 November 2007
Swonder, not sure what you mean about "basis of 100k or 550k." I believe (but not totally certain) that regardless of what ex-husband pays ex-wife for her share of the investment property, his basis will be the carryover basis of $100,000. See IRC 1041 and related Treasury Regs.