Discussion:Disallowance of 1040x filed in 2005 for 2002
From TaxAlmanac, A Free Online Resource for Tax Professionals
Note: You are using this website at your own risk, subject to our Disclaimer and Website Use and Contribution Terms.
From TaxAlmanac
(Difference between revisions)
| Revision as of 07:41, 13 December 2005 DZCPA (Talk | contribs) ← Previous diff |
Current revision Umk395 (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| {{ForumReplyPost|UserID=DZCPA|Date=13 December 2005|Text=Refile. Due date for 2002 is 4/15/2003 plus 3 years equals 4/15/2006. What was the amendment for? Loss carryback?}} | {{ForumReplyPost|UserID=DZCPA|Date=13 December 2005|Text=Refile. Due date for 2002 is 4/15/2003 plus 3 years equals 4/15/2006. What was the amendment for? Loss carryback?}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{ForumReplyPost|UserID=Umk395|Date=15 December 2005|Text=Should have been allowed -- you are omitting important facts. What else did they tell you?}} | ||
Current revision
Discussion Forum Index --> Tax Questions --> Disallowance of 1040x filed in 2005 for 2002
01preparer (talk|edits) said: | 7 December 2005 |
| I would like to know why a 1040x is disallowed for 2002 if it is filed in 2005? | |
| 10 December 2005 | |
| If it was an additional refund claimed, the statute is 3 years from the due date of the return, or 2 years from the date the tax is paid. IRS considers the tax paid (credited) on 4-15-2003 for a 2002 tax return. | |
| 13 December 2005 | |
| Refile. Due date for 2002 is 4/15/2003 plus 3 years equals 4/15/2006. What was the amendment for? Loss carryback? | |
| 15 December 2005 | |
| Should have been allowed -- you are omitting important facts. What else did they tell you? | |


