Discussion:Dependents in Mexico

From TaxAlmanac, A Free Online Resource for Tax Professionals
Note: You are using this website at your own risk, subject to our Disclaimer and Website Use and Contribution Terms.

From TaxAlmanac

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 21:31, 3 May 2006
HPTAX (Talk | contribs)
(While we're at i)
← Previous diff
Revision as of 03:50, 4 May 2006
Oaxacquita (Talk | contribs)
(Good Evening, I)
Next diff →
Line 156: Line 156:
Any of these relationships that were established by marriage are not ended by death or divorce.}} Any of these relationships that were established by marriage are not ended by death or divorce.}}
 +
 +{{ForumReplyPost|UserID=Oaxacquita|Date=4 May 2006|Text=Good Evening,
 +
 +I want thank everyone for taking the time to responding to my inquiry...These lively discussions are what make tax so much more interesting.
 +
 +OAXACQUITA}}

Revision as of 03:50, 4 May 2006

Discussion Forum Index --> Tax Questions --> Dependents in Mexico

Oaxacquita (talk|edits) said:

28 April 2006
Greetings Everyone:

I'm new to this business, so please bear with me...I have a taxpayer who would like to declare several siblings who reside in Mexico as dependents. Two of siblings are under 18 and the other two are 19 and 20. He supports the entire family still left in Mexico, can the taxpayer declare them as dependents even though the individual are not living with him? I would appreciate a response.

Thank You....or as they say in old Mexico...Muchas Gracias.

Martineo (talk|edits) said:

29 April 2006
Si se puede- I guess that "yes" He can

(Pero me olvide del significado de siblings, half-brothers?? I'm too tired ,and I left my reference book at work. Technical problem : An ITIN number need to be obtained. Wait for more answers.

Martineo (talk|edits) said:

29 April 2006
Si se puede??- I'm back- I got a rest.

No se puede

-- Maybe . Lets see: Qualifying children include your children, siblings if a residence test and age or student test are also met. In addition, the residfent test. Tests: 1- Relatinship test:

Your children, stepchildren, and your siblings meet the relationship test

2- Residence test; NOPE- The children must have the the same residence as him for more than half of the year.

Age test(or student test) : Yes. Under age 19 or a ful time student under age 24 at the end of that year.

Then: One test is missing - or fail-- No a qualifying children NO SE PUEDE- No , Now What about a qualifyng dependent? It could be IFFFFF they are not a qualifyng children for somebody else. IOn my view: YES Taxpayer definition in my view apply just for residents in USA, not in Mexico. And, they are not making more than $ 3 , 200. (I guess Not . There are in Mexico. Conclusion: Maybe. It would be hard to do it . A SSN or an ITIN card need to be obtained.

Martineo (talk|edits) said:

29 April 2006
One more advise:

Buy the Book J K Lasser's Your Income Tax 2006- I'm planning to get the professional edition for next tax season--if still alive. Pages 419 and 420 explain what I wrote. Have a great day, and a great headache.

Oaxacquita (talk|edits) said:

30 April 2006
Martineo:

Thank you for responding to inquiry....I will look into the reference material you have suggested. I'm using "The Tax Book" put out by Tax Materials, Inc" (a clone version of QuickFinder), but their explanation regarding my tax issue seem be a bit unclear.

I gather from the number of responses I received from my inquiry, not many of our seasoned collegues run into this type of issue very often.

Muchas Gracias

Martineo (talk|edits) said:

30 April 2006
Any time. Tax code is tought- I'm sorry if sometimes I do not give the right answer. If you are going to file income taxes for Mexicans, you should be familiar with ITINs . Download Form W-7 and read the instructions. I read someplace that ,living in Mexico, they need to go to the USA embassy there in order to get his papers certified . (Two pictures Identifications need it to get an ITIN)

But according with the book, just a parent can claim a son that is not living with him...and a release from the mother will be needed... I'm guessing.. I never did something like that - Maybe other preparer want to add some ideas

Mr. CPA (talk|edits) said:

30 April 2006
Oaxacquita,

Your client can claim all his siblings in Mexico as dependents. His siblings are be considered 'qualifying relatives' and need not live with him in order to be claimed as dependents.

As long as none of the siblings earn more than $3,200 a year, they are all eligible to be claimed as dependents on your client's return.

Martineo (talk|edits) said:

30 April 2006
Sorry- I'm checking. I think Mr CPA is right- Page 420 and 421 J K LASSER

Riley2 (talk|edits) said:

30 April 2006
Oaxacquita, assuming that none of the household members in Mexico is required to file a U.S. tax income tax return, then based on the facts you have presented, there should be no problem with claiming the siblings and/or parents as dependents. See Sec. 152(d) and 152(b).

Meadowglenatmonroe@frontiernet.net (talk|edits) said:

3 May 2006
Wednesday, May 03, 2006

Greetings, Oaxacquita.

In order to claim the taxpayer's siblings as dependency exemptions, each of the four siblings must qualify as either a Qualifying Child or a Qualifying Relative. There are four tests to determine if one is a Qualifying Child of a taxpayer. All four of these tests must be met. These four tests are as follows:

    1 - Relationship Test - A brother or sister, or sibling, can qualify under this test.  TEST PASSED.
    2 - Residency Test - Each of the four siblings must have lived with the taxpayer for more than one-half of a year.  This test is not met
        because all four of the siblings apparently live in Mexico on a full-time basis.  TEST FAILED.

There is no need to apply the other two tests because the Residency Test failed, and all four tests must be satisfied.

THEREFORE, EACH OF THE FOUR SIBLINGS ARE NOT QUALIFYING CHILDREN of your taxpayer client. But, what about a Qualifying Relative? There are five tests that have to be met, and all five tests, to determine one as a Qualifying Relative. These five tests are as follows:

    1 - Relationship Test - This test was met through the Relationship Test to determine a Qualifying Child.  TEST PASSED
    2 - Support Test - The taxpayer must provide more than one-half of the support for each of the four siblings.  Based on your facts, 
        this test is met.  TEST PASSED.   
    3 - Gross Income Test - Each of the four siblings cannot earn more than $ 3,200.00 for 2005.  The number is $ 3,300.00 for 2006.
    4 - CITIZENSHIP TEST -  Each of the four siblings MUST BE EITHER A CITIZEN OR RESIDENT ALIEN OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.  Since each of
        the four siblings live in Mexico, it does not seem that they are resident aliens or citizens of The United States of America.  TEST FAILED. 
 There is no need to apply the fifth test because the Citizenship Test is not met, and all five tests must be met.  THEREFORE, EACH OF THE FOUR

SIBLINGS DO NOT QUALIFY AS QUALIFYING RELATIVES OF YOUR TAXPAYER CLIENT.

Since each of the four siblings of your taxpayer client do not qualify as either a Qualifying Child or as a Qualifying Relative, then your taxpayer client CANNOT CLAIM ANY OF THE FOUR SIBLINGS AS DEPENDENCY EXEMPTIONS on his individual income tax returns - federal and state (s).

Thank you.


Very Truly Yours,


Angelo Liberati CPA, CFE Managing Member Accurate Accountants, CPA'S, LLC

Numbers Done Right...The First Time

Business Address: 20 Ford Court, Meadow Glen, Monroe, New York State 10950 - 4946 Business Telephone Number: (845) 782 - 5228 Business Facsimile Number: (845) 782 - 5582 Business E - Mail Address: meadowglenatmonroe@frontiernet.net

911...4 years...7 months...22 days...Always Remember...Never Forget

Dennis (talk|edits) said:

3 May 2006
Aha! Disagreement. Perhaps we shall learn the precise legal definition of "contiguous?" Or maybe just the proper usage of the apostrophe. ♫

Meadowglenatmonroe@frontiernet.net (talk|edits) said:

3 May 2006
I would like to slightly amend my prior message. The Citizenship Test is met when the potential qualifying relatives are residents of a country that is contiguous to The United States of America, such as Canada or Mexico. However, if each of the four siblings are citizens of Mexico, in addition to being residents of Mexico,and not citizens of The United States of America, then I believe that the CITIZENSHIP TEST IS NOT MET.

Thank you.

Mtmckeecpa (talk|edits) said:

3 May 2006
Yep, Mexico would be contiguous.

Martineo (talk|edits) said:

3 May 2006
No Meadowglennatmonroe---NOPE Citizenship test does not mean US citizenship.

"U s citizen ,OR A RESIDENT OF THE USA, CANADA OR MEXICO, Riley and CPA are giving us the answer- Still I recognize that it would be hard to get the ITIN numbers. By the way, please, What the hell is siblings: The dictionary is giving me two definitions.

HPTAX (talk|edits) said:

3 May 2006
"siblings" son hermanos

Tdoyle (talk|edits) said:

3 May 2006
As a long-term genealogist, I know that the common definition of a sibling is "a brother or sister". So 'four siblings' to me means 'four brothers and/or sisters'.

- Tim Doyle, TaxAlmanac Moderator 16:27, 3 May 2006 (CDT)

HPTAX (talk|edits) said:

3 May 2006
While we're at it, why don't we add los padres:

From IRS pub 501

Relatives who do not have to live with you.

A person related to you in any of the following ways does not have to live with you all year as a member of your household to meet this test.

Your child, stepchild, eligible foster child, or a descendant of any of them (for example, your grandchild). (A legally adopted child is considered your child.)

Your brother, sister, half brother, half sister, stepbrother, or stepsister.

Your father, mother, grandparent, or other direct ancestor, but not foster parent.

Your stepfather or stepmother.

A son or daughter of your brother or sister.

A brother or sister of your father or mother.

Your son-in-law, daughter-in-law, father-in-law, mother-in-law, brother-in-law, or sister-in-law.

Any of these relationships that were established by marriage are not ended by death or divorce.

Oaxacquita (talk|edits) said:

4 May 2006
Good Evening,

I want thank everyone for taking the time to responding to my inquiry...These lively discussions are what make tax so much more interesting.

OAXACQUITA