Discussion:Building contractor getting paid as house is built?
From TaxAlmanac
| Revision as of 13:56, 14 March 2008 Scottycoyote (Talk | contribs) (ok wait, then wh) ← Previous diff |
Revision as of 14:04, 14 March 2008 Vickytown (Talk | contribs) (If you are a "sm) Next diff → |
||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
| Right now im showing the income as they make it.}} | Right now im showing the income as they make it.}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{ForumReplyPost|UserID=Vickytown|Date=14 March 2008|Text=If you are a "small" residential contractor (under $10 million), then you can use several methods for reporting taxable income and expenses including the completed contract method. There is an IRS brochure called "Accounting for Construction Contracts - Constructon Tax Tips" which is very helpful. I think if you do a search on the IRS web site for "construction contracts" it should come up.}} | ||
Revision as of 14:04, 14 March 2008
Discussion Forum Index --> Basic Tax Questions --> Building contractor getting paid as house is built?
Discussion Forum Index --> Tax Questions --> Building contractor getting paid as house is built?
Scottycoyote (talk|edits) said: | 13 March 2008 |
| normally i captialize all the costs and put them into cost basis then show them as expense in the year the house is sold.
Got a contractor thats building custom houses to order now, and basically they get reimbursed for all their costs and make 6 to 10% over that as a contractor fee. Im thinking in this situation youd have to show the income and expense as you go now, if i wait until the house is closed on and it goes into the next year there are some timing issues im guessing the irs wouldnt agree with? | |
Scottycoyote (talk|edits) said: | 13 March 2008 |
| nevermind
percentage of completion accounting | |
RoyDaleOne (talk|edits) said: | 14 March 2008 |
| Why? | |
| 14 March 2008 | |
| "nevermind
percentage of completion accounting " See Sec. 460(e). | |
RoyDaleOne (talk|edits) said: | 14 March 2008 |
| Did not give sales revenue level!!! | |
Scottycoyote (talk|edits) said: | 14 March 2008 |
| ive looked and looked, i didnt see where revenue level came into play, can you elaborate please? | |
Scottycoyote (talk|edits) said: | 14 March 2008 |
| kewl thanks
revenue was about 600k so they are on the hook | |
RoyDaleOne (talk|edits) said: | 14 March 2008 |
| 600K is way short of 5mil what is up here? | |
| 14 March 2008 | |
| I thought revenue had to be $10 million before the percentage of completion requirement. | |
Scottycoyote (talk|edits) said: | 14 March 2008 |
| my bad, too many late nights.........thought that read revenue less than 5 mil requires the method. Must...drink....more....coffee | |
Scottycoyote (talk|edits) said: | 14 March 2008 |
| ok wait, then what method am i supposed to be using? If i do it the normal way with contractors....include all costs and income in the year of sale, the timing is off because my client is getting paid portions as they go.
Right now im showing the income as they make it. | |
| 14 March 2008 | |
| If you are a "small" residential contractor (under $10 million), then you can use several methods for reporting taxable income and expenses including the completed contract method. There is an IRS brochure called "Accounting for Construction Contracts - Constructon Tax Tips" which is very helpful. I think if you do a search on the IRS web site for "construction contracts" it should come up. | |


