User talk:Bracket Creep

From TaxAlmanac, A Free Online Resource for Tax Professionals
Note: You are using this website at your own risk, subject to our Disclaimer and Website Use and Contribution Terms.

From TaxAlmanac

Jump to: navigation, search
Leave a message for Bracket Creep

This page is where you can leave a message for Bracket Creep. Bracket Creep will be notified of messages the next time they access TaxAlmanac.

Please make sure to sign your message by adding four tildes: ~~~~ at the end of your message.

If you are actually Bracket Creep, this is your page. Feel free to edit your discussion page to add or remove anything you'd like.

Leave a message for Bracket Creep by clicking here



Remember the last time....



I'd say

at least triple D.

Shoes ..... What size?

Belle 16:36, 18 August 2010 (CDT)


You do know the definition of the perfect woman, don't you? Belle 16:48, 18 August 2010 (CDT)

Look closely...

She's holding the two Miller High Lifes, but she chooses to *drink* the PBR; it's in her left hand.

Harry Boscoe


I see why you pulled that post (LOL)...had to google it (and I haven't exactly led a sheltered life). It's also obvious why (from the profile picture)BC is the one who posted.

College boys

Yeah well, considering I'm a speed limit (55) I don't think those college boys are talking about me. And it isn't a phrase I heard back in my college days - and I did hear many as I was the only chick working in a ski shop where the guys didn't pull any punches. It's where I developed my 'sailor mouth' Belle

Sorry, dude

Apparently your reference was a little too single-entendre for at least one user, as I had a request to change one of your discussion titles on the grounds that it was offensive. I moved the original title to a subtitle, and tried to rename along the same lines as the original. Hope that works for you....


You think mine wasn't clean enough?

You're probably right; I had started with just "seeds" but as soon as I typed it I realized the opportunity. I was trying to maintain the original sense of the discussion - you know, win/win for both you and the name-change-requester. Seeds is, of course, much better (unless it entices someone to open the discussion and see the subtitle!) Trillium


Hey, Creepy - thanks for the video. These last two days have been brutal, but I'm ready to just kick back tomorrow and stomp out any last minute fires. Then a martini and lots of sleep. Here's hoping the last day is smoooooooth for you. Belle 06:02, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Am I who? NO

You served with Who, who has a tattoo?

No I am not, but I did take your detailed information and went to the California Accountancy Board and apparently that is a real person.

I thought this was a site where ONLY a User could choose to provide his/her detailed information or not?

There didn't appear to be much respect for each other here, Especially CPA's for EA's and EA's for CPA, but until you here I thought there was at least professional respect for a persons privacy, whom ever they are.

No I am not your "I served with buddy," judging by your picture, two things:

  • You apparantly do have money to buy your happiness, if she is that for you
  • You are no longer "fit-for-duty"

Oh, if your served in the military I did post a "picture" for old soldiers, "Once a Soldier, Always a soidier.

Just courious, do I look like your old buddy

Mufid to Bracket Creep

Oh I just realized with all these silly names it wasn't "creepy"

It was TAX Bracket creep, sorry :)

No I am not Hugh30.

And I apologize for editing YOUR post in my User page

  • It was not about "who I am"
  • It was someones real detailed info, anyone
  • I "used it" at Calif Accountancy and he apparently is real
  • I just feel everyone is losing their privacy
  • I apologize for tampering with your post, just detail for anyones identity theft worries me

I did post an apology in General Chat if I offended anyone, I dib not mean too.

I did not want to ARGUE anything, but to discuss with "those" whom i believe KNOW NUMBERS

That $16 TRILLION in USA current debt. It was ZERO in mid 60's, thus al lot has to be that 60% of federal budget is only entitlements

I am NOT anti helping anyone. But this tired Business Phrase, Trickle down (to the worker)

That can not compare with the Welfare/Entitlement system of Trickle down to those IN NEED (not want or laziness).

I'm just an accountant, looking at the numbers that do not LIE.

It is not D or R, It is time they are dropped, ALL Campaign ADs outlawed and the only way an INDIVIDUAL can "run-for-office" is to datnd next to their opponent in broadcasted debates.

It would also DROP the expensinve cost OF running-for-Office so that more Citizens could Govern.

BC that is just my opinion, not an untimatum

As to how to use this site, i really don't care to learn it

PEACE and a Peaceful Memorial Day to you

So far so good

Here, anyway. What you're doing sound like no fun at all. Best of luck....

End of the forum

You may have heard by now that the Tax Almanac ( ) web site forum is permanently closing its doors effective June 1. Perhaps you have seen the pink bombshell “Important Service Announcement” when logging in.

Long-time TA user ChrisV2 has volunteered to set up a new website where TA users may continue the discussion. The site is up and running now and has an active base of contributors.

We invite you to take a look and join your fellow TA refugees.

Frankly (TA member and new member of TaxProTalk)

Frankly 16:05, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Personal tools