User contributions
From TaxAlmanac, A Free Online Resource for Tax Professionals
Note: You are using this website at your own risk, subject to our Disclaimer and Website Use and Contribution Terms.
From TaxAlmanac
(Latest | Earliest) View (newer 50) (older 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
- 22:41, 7 June 2006 (hist) (diff) Discussion:New tax practice (Is that a New Of)
- 00:04, 6 June 2006 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Need to interview someone (It depends? What) (top)
- 11:53, 1 June 2006 (hist) (diff) User talk:Tdoyle Archive (Viruses)
- 11:44, 1 June 2006 (hist) (diff) Discussion:How to reduce late filing and late payment penalties (Good question!!)
- 23:48, 31 May 2006 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Expert in OIC, please (Than you so much) (top)
- 17:13, 30 May 2006 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Expert in OIC, please (Does any one hav)
- 20:21, 28 May 2006 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Expert in OIC, please (Okey. I got some)
- 15:55, 28 May 2006 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Expert in OIC, please (I'm back. Steve:)
- 15:23, 28 May 2006 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Expert in OIC, please (Steve: I got som)
- 00:20, 28 May 2006 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Expert in OIC, please (I'm working on t)
- 19:08, 27 May 2006 (hist) (diff) User talk:Tdoyle Archive (Trying to find old opinions)
- 13:33, 27 May 2006 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Expert in OIC, please (Thank you Steve-)
- 22:36, 26 May 2006 (hist) (diff) N Discussion:Expert in OIC, please (New Discussion)
- 18:18, 26 May 2006 (hist) (diff) Discussion Archives:EIC and Dependents (Does the questio)
- 17:24, 26 May 2006 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Is this fraud. (I would never do)
- 15:23, 26 May 2006 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Form 4506-T Request for Transcript (Thank you, every) (top)
- 15:14, 26 May 2006 (hist) (diff) Discussion Archives:EIC taxpayers need to be citizens (I have nothing t)
- 13:09, 26 May 2006 (hist) (diff) Discussion:If client does not pay for work performed (May I get a samp)
- 13:04, 26 May 2006 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Is this fraud. (Wife are always)
- 19:26, 22 May 2006 (hist) (diff) Discussion:EA vs. CPA exam (I agree with you)
- 15:56, 17 May 2006 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Who has worked for them?????/ (That is the reas)
- 15:51, 17 May 2006 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Updating Resume - good definition of tax pro (Definition is no)
- 15:43, 17 May 2006 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Would this be considered fraud? (In my view, Glen) (top)
- 15:24, 17 May 2006 (hist) (diff) User talk:Www.cpa1.biz (Feedback)
- 15:24, 17 May 2006 (hist) (diff) User talk:Www.cpa1.biz (Feedback)
- 15:06, 17 May 2006 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Who has worked for them?????/ (I was with all o)
- 17:56, 13 May 2006 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Intent to Levy (I think I will h)
- 19:47, 12 May 2006 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Intent to Levy (Skasselea: Regar)
- 18:02, 12 May 2006 (hist) (diff) N Discussion:Cont Educ (New Discussion)
- 21:09, 11 May 2006 (hist) (diff) Discussion:6251 (My opinion Impos)
- 20:39, 11 May 2006 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Would this be considered fraud? (Form 8379 states)
- 20:30, 11 May 2006 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Would this be considered fraud? (Taxea, Read agai)
- 18:42, 11 May 2006 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Taxable? Discrimination Award (Quoting from pub)
- 18:16, 11 May 2006 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Taxable? Discrimination Award (Line 21- other i)
- 14:42, 11 May 2006 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Intent to Levy (Skasselea: Steve)
- 23:38, 10 May 2006 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Intent to Levy (And one more inf)
- 22:54, 10 May 2006 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Intent to Levy (More infO: Tax y)
- 20:52, 10 May 2006 (hist) (diff) Discussion:How to request tax return copies from the IRS (SKq9545: May I g)
- 20:39, 10 May 2006 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Employer number (My opinion No em)
- 19:23, 10 May 2006 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Intent to Levy (Record of accoun)
- 15:41, 9 May 2006 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Intent to Levy (Taxref: No hard)
- 15:19, 9 May 2006 (hist) (diff) User:Skassel
- 11:33, 9 May 2006 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Intent to Levy (Skasselea: Thank)
- 10:56, 8 May 2006 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Would this be considered fraud? (No Injured spous)
- 10:41, 8 May 2006 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Errors and Omissions insurance (Thank you. Two y)
- 19:39, 7 May 2006 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Errors and Omissions insurance (Hi Beengel: Are)
- 19:34, 7 May 2006 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Back Taxes Owed (Tell the client)
- 17:09, 7 May 2006 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Back Taxes Owed (Tavant; OIC requ)
- 16:05, 7 May 2006 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Dependents in Mexico (Dependents- At l)
- 17:06, 6 May 2006 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Taxpayer ID (Which legal prob)
(Latest | Earliest) View (newer 50) (older 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)