User contributions

From TaxAlmanac

(Latest | Earliest) View (previous 50) (next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500).

• 17:06, 12 March 2010 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Working while drawing social security disability (SSA specialist recommended) (top)
• 04:20, 10 March 2010 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Who can a w-9? (link to form and instructions re signatures) (top)
• 16:56, 9 March 2010 (hist) (diff) m Discussion:Export QB Online Edition to Workstation version (change link format) (top)
• 16:51, 9 March 2010 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Export QB Online Edition to Workstation version (point to recent bio claiming particular expertise)
• 01:07, 7 March 2010 (hist) (diff) m Discussion:Fringe Benefit for Partner (change word to reflect orig intention)
• 23:14, 6 March 2010 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Fringe Benefit for Partner (useful link)
• 22:27, 6 March 2010 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Fringe Benefit for Partner (push back)
• 08:32, 6 March 2010 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Fringe Benefit for Partner (amstrong supports 119 treatment)
• 19:06, 5 March 2010 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Fringe Benefit for Partner (summary of previous definitions)
• 18:22, 5 March 2010 (hist) (diff) m Discussion:Fringe Benefit for Partner (fix link)
• 17:58, 5 March 2010 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Self-employed and Per Diem (application of 62-2)
• 17:26, 5 March 2010 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Fringe Benefit for Partner (Clarify employee in context of Sec 61, and 119)
• 09:21, 5 March 2010 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Tryin to make commuting/lodging deductible (taxability of past payments)
• 07:48, 5 March 2010 (hist) (diff) m Discussion:Self-employed and Per Diem (add additional reference context)
• 07:45, 5 March 2010 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Self-employed and Per Diem (application of working condition fringe employee definition)
• 07:15, 5 March 2010 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Fringe Benefit for Partner (reference to code)
• 05:55, 5 March 2010 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Temporary Work Expenses (point to similiar IRS example)
• 15:56, 4 March 2010 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Schedule M, efile rejection (Refer to previous military retiree)
• 02:15, 3 March 2010 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Big Orange Line across the top of your screen... (It has worked fo)
• 18:55, 28 February 2010 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Excess FICA (But Not What You Think!) (point to code sections to back up answer by prior poster)
• 14:45, 28 February 2010 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Home Buyer Credit-Partial Rental (refer to answer in other thread)
• 15:07, 27 February 2010 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Skates-Depreciate or Expense (suggest GAA treatment)
• 00:35, 22 February 2010 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Teacher Excellence Stipend (Clarify previous reference)
• 15:14, 21 February 2010 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Teacher Excellence Stipend (putting the train back on track)
• 02:37, 21 February 2010 (hist) (diff) m Discussion:Tax Home for Construction Worker (format correction) (top)
• 02:22, 21 February 2010 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Tax Home for Construction Worker (Cite to Ellwein)
• 16:08, 20 February 2010 (hist) (diff) m User talk:PVCC-CCIFP (top)
• 16:05, 20 February 2010 (hist) (diff) m User:PVCC-CCIFP (top)
• 04:14, 20 February 2010 (hist) (diff) m TaxAlmanac Top Contributors (→Silver - 2-19-2010)
• 04:10, 20 February 2010 (hist) (diff) m User:PVCC-CCIFP (add silver box)
• 09:09, 18 February 2010 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Tax Home for Construction Worker (he might have a regular place of work)
• 19:33, 17 February 2010 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Tax Home for Construction Worker (disagree with no duplicate expense conclusion)
• 15:55, 15 February 2010 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Reverse Schedule M Reject (Privacy act requirements)
• 01:59, 15 February 2010 (hist) (diff) m Discussion:Cost of a dry well (add linl to code) (top)
• 00:16, 15 February 2010 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Silent Auction & Taxpayer Received 1099 (attachment suggestion)
• 23:00, 14 February 2010 (hist) (diff) m Discussion:Silent Auction & Taxpayer Received 1099 (clarify context)
• 22:30, 14 February 2010 (hist) (diff) m Discussion:Silent Auction & Taxpayer Received 1099 (Remove line 21 reference)
• 22:02, 14 February 2010 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Silent Auction & Taxpayer Received 1099 (W-2G vs 1099 income)
• 20:39, 14 February 2010 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Silent Auction & Taxpayer Received 1099 (clarify, and suggested treatment)
• 20:24, 14 February 2010 (hist) (diff) Discussion:NonProfit-New Board-No prior financials-Fraud (Automatic revocation) (top)
• 19:27, 14 February 2010 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Silent Auction & Taxpayer Received 1099 (seek 1099 correction)
• 19:23, 14 February 2010 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Silent Auction & Taxpayer Received 1099 (Deduction not income)
• 14:11, 13 February 2010 (hist) (diff) Discussion:More snow on the way.... (49/50)
• 04:51, 13 February 2010 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Are legal fees paid by employer on behalf of employees taxable income to employees? (Site TC opinion in support of previous comment)
• 15:11, 12 February 2010 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Are legal fees paid by employer on behalf of employees taxable income to employees? (point to Sec. 162. and 132 for deductibility, and exclusion from income)
• 20:01, 8 February 2010 (hist) (diff) Discussion:How to get spouse $250 economic recovery payment check (slight clarification of possible misinformation) (top)
• 16:12, 6 February 2010 (hist) (diff) Discussion:2009 Individual Tax - "Headache Log" (clarify role of SSA-1099)
• 06:14, 6 February 2010 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Deceased Social Security Recipient and the $250.00 Credit (SSA's advice re ERP issued to deceased person)
• 06:05, 6 February 2010 (hist) (diff) Discussion:2009 Individual Tax - "Headache Log" (gentle chastisement about assuming anything re SSA)
• 05:25, 6 February 2010 (hist) (diff) Discussion:2009 Individual Tax - "Headache Log" (Clarify distinction between GRTC and ERP)

(Latest | Earliest) View (previous 50) (next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500).