User contributions
From TaxAlmanac, A Free Online Resource for Tax Professionals
Note: You are using this website at your own risk, subject to our Disclaimer and Website Use and Contribution Terms.
From TaxAlmanac
(Latest | Earliest) View (previous 50) (next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500).
- 00:21, 22 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Appeals question? (Many years ago I) (top)
- 23:40, 21 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Appeals question? (But I believe th)
- 17:43, 21 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Converting IRA to Roth if maybe eligible (You would show t)
- 16:46, 21 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Converting IRA to Roth if maybe eligible (Not to be morbid)
- 16:41, 21 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Submitting more info during SND 90-day period (Sec. 6212(d))
- 15:16, 21 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Converting IRA to Roth if maybe eligible
- 15:16, 21 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Converting IRA to Roth if maybe eligible (And for 2009 a M)
- 15:11, 21 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Converting IRA to Roth if maybe eligible (His age? Date o)
- 13:50, 21 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Luxury Auto (You know, I thin) (top)
- 13:39, 21 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Submitting more info during SND 90-day period (Call the 90-day)
- 13:34, 21 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Mandatory e-File (In another threa)
- 21:16, 20 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Appeals question? (I found in a cas)
- 20:13, 20 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Appeals question? (File petition wi)
- 18:26, 20 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Luxury Auto (Correct.....Sect)
- 18:15, 20 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Luxury Auto ($2,960 = 20% (fi)
- 18:11, 20 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Luxury Auto (That is the doll)
- 18:10, 20 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Luxury Auto ($14,800, resulti)
- 14:39, 20 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Wash Sale rules - Donation ("Wash sale rules)
- 14:37, 20 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Wash Sale rules - Donation (I hope the stock)
- 13:26, 20 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Roth Surprise! (Other considerat)
- 00:32, 20 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Attention: NYS Tax Preparers (I registered tod)
- 22:09, 19 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Reaching across state lines (The other though) (top)
- 18:57, 19 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:New York preparer registration (I don't understa)
- 16:30, 19 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Attention: NYS Tax Preparers (And write your s)
- 16:14, 19 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Capital loss on IRA conversion (Do refer your CP)
- 16:01, 19 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Reaching across state lines (Pennsylvania lik)
- 15:18, 19 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Earnest Money Forfeited - Listed Property (We haven't seen)
- 14:36, 19 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:IRS Apology?? (New Discussion)
- 00:28, 19 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Capital loss on IRA conversion (I had assumed th)
- 22:03, 18 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Capital loss on IRA conversion (If the answer to)
- 21:59, 18 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Capital loss on IRA conversion (And that 20,000)
- 20:18, 18 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Unforeseen Circumstances - Section 121 (New Discussion) (top)
- 18:41, 18 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:W-2 and 1099 issued to same person (Who signs, and w)
- 17:18, 18 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Mandatory e-File (You will also ru)
- 16:25, 18 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Mandatory e-File (I have efiled CA)
- 16:20, 18 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Is 14,700 meaningful? (Mr. Shulman seem) (top)
- 15:58, 18 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Mandatory e-File (As I recall, I h)
- 15:02, 18 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Reaching across state lines ("the corporation)
- 14:13, 18 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Is 14,700 meaningful? (New Discussion)
- 14:07, 18 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD CLAIMED BY TWO UNMARRIED PARENTS IN THE SAME HOUSE ("The Merckes con)
- 13:50, 18 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Mandatory e-File (Seems to me too)
- 02:04, 18 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Mandatory e-File (Michael: I am n)
- 22:39, 17 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:New Mandatory e-filing; More than 10 returns (By the way, Harr) (top)
- 22:31, 17 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:High income taxpayer required estimated tax (It's in cases li) (top)
- 20:08, 17 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:IRS Priority Line.... Is it me? (More than likely)
- 20:06, 17 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:New Mandatory e-filing; More than 10 returns (Just call me Kar)
- 19:04, 17 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:New Mandatory e-filing; More than 10 returns
- 19:03, 17 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:New Mandatory e-filing; More than 10 returns (Tin can and stri)
- 16:31, 17 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD CLAIMED BY TWO UNMARRIED PARENTS IN THE SAME HOUSE (Is Mom#2 on the)
- 14:16, 17 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Bullet proof glass, anyone? (New Discussion) (top)
(Latest | Earliest) View (previous 50) (next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500).
