Discussion:Vacation home rental - can it ever become schedule C income?
From TaxAlmanac
Discussion Forum Index --> Basic Tax Questions --> Vacation home rental - can it ever become schedule C income?
Discussion Forum Index --> Tax Questions --> Vacation home rental - can it ever become schedule C income?
28 March 2011 | |
Due to the temporary rental nature of vacation homes, can IRS ever decide to reclassify as Schedule C income if "services" are provided? For example, what about the linen service provided for clean towels and sheets for the beds? I would think that this is the case for EVERY vacation home rental, so there must be some provision for ignoring such "services". |
28 March 2011 | |
If the average rental period is 7 days or less or 30 days or less with significant services, then yes it would be Sch C. As you describe the services, these would not be significant. |
Laketahoecpa (talk|edits) said: | 28 March 2011 |
I think the IRS would look at this issue more if vacation rentals showed a profit which they typically don't.
It's interesting because §469 specifically excludes rentals with average stay of 7 days or less from definition of "per se" rental. The editorial content of research service I use states that the rationale for the seven-day rule is that the person furnishing the property for short-term rental is generally required to provide services significant enough to justify the conclusion that the person is engaged in a service business rather than a rental activity. Now I wish I had an actual regulation or case to cite with this language but I don't. But whether it should go on Schedule C really means should you be paying self-employment taxes - so we look to the rules under §1402 for that determination. Only guidance is §1402(c)-(4)(c) and only example of services performed in conjuction to rental of property that would rise to level of trade or business is maid services. So our vacation rentals fall in that grey area of the spectrum between hotel and long-term rental. I believe that reporting on Schedule E is the more conservative approach because these rentals do typically generate losses. Whether you can deduct that loss depends on whether you materially participate. If yes, loss would be deductible whether reported on Schedule E or Schedule C. If no, loss is limited under passive activity rules whether reported on Schedule E or Schedule C. I think the bigger area for concern by the IRS is taking the $25,000 active participation passive loss allowance on a vacation rental loss. |
28 March 2011 | |
thanks to both of you .. I think I just poked my nose under a tent that I did not want to poke into... ;-) randy |
Tacampbell (talk|edits) said: | 26 December 2011 |
A follow-on question regarding Schedule C vs E for vacation rental reporting:
In the first year of renting a vacation home (purchased specifically for vacation rentals averaging less than 7 days) we (wife and I) anticipate a loss. We are active participants, managing the advertising, screening and approving renters, handling all credit card transactions, cleaning between renters, and all repairs and renovations to the house and property. We have other income significantly in excess of $150K. We formed a single-member LLC (although property is deeded in my wife and my names, not the LLC's) for this venture, and we'd like to report it on Schedule C so we can take the loss against other earnings (and with $150K+ income we are already over our SE tax limit so the SE tax implication is minimal.) From the looks of it, reporting on Sched C seems viable and logical for at least this first year, although it paints a target on our backs. Other than the target it paints, any other words of advice? And on a related note, any thoughts on how the IRS would view moving the business activity from Schedule C to Sched E in later years as it starts to turn a profit? BTW - my wife is a financial service CPA, so we have access to tax professionals we plan to use as well, but this forum seems like a good place to get alternate points of view. TC |
Harry Boscoe (talk|edits) said: | 26 December 2011 |
TC, it sounds like you're suggesting that if your short-term vacation rental property is reported on Schedule C, your tax loss from the activity won't be subject to the passive loss limitation rules (Section 469).
Seems to me that on Schedule C the net loss would *still* be subject to those limitations, and that you're going find yourself needing to establish your material participation in the activity, if the losses are going to be non-passive and deductible. |
Harry Boscoe (talk|edits) said: | 26 December 2011 |
If you've got a coupla minutes to spare, you can read this pretty long thread on the topic of short-term rentals and SE tax, from just last summer. This area is a rat's nest of overlapping issues and "authorities". |
26 December 2011 | |
Harry's right. The mere fact that the activity doesn't constitute a per se rental activity under Sec. 469(c)(2) by virtue of satisfying one of the tests in Reg. 1.469-1T(e)(3)(ii) doesn't mean that the activity is a nonpassive activity. The taxpayer still needs to satisfy the material participation requirements before the activity is treated as nonpassive. See Misko v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2005-166.
And having the activity NOT treated as a rental can sometimes be worse than treating it as a rental because the taxpayer doesn't get the $25,000 passive loss allowance under Sec. 469(i). |
Tacampbell (talk|edits) said: | 26 December 2011 |
Great! Thank you so much for the reading material - it will take a bit to digest over the next few days, and I may have a follow-on question for you all, but I appreciate you sharing your knowledge. It's not that I don't trust our tax adviser, it's just that so often "unusual" circumstances like this are treated to the "easiest" solution by many professionals who only do standard returns. Having some background and understanding of the issue (along with precedents) means we can get to the best answer, not just the easiest.
(This isn't a slam on tax professionals in any way. The same holds true regarding taking the road most often traveled in almost all industries - from computer programmers to electricians, to tax professionals. We all like to stay in our comfort zone, and when confronted with an uncommon situation try to fit the problem to our most comfortable solution instead of the other way around.) |