Discussion:Looking for a Forum for those studying for EA
From TaxAlmanac
Discussion Forum Index --> Business Growth Community --> Looking for a Forum for those studying for EA
22 June 2007 | |
Is anyone aware of a forum for people studying for the EA exam? I'm studying using the Gleim materials. They are very helpful, but I didn't spring for the "live" professor portion and I don't have anyone to ask questions when I don't fully understand something. I'm not new to tax prep, but I want to get "certified" for myself and for my clients. And there are definitely some areas that I am uncertain on.
Thanks for any help, Pat P |
22 June 2007 | |
Ask away. Speaking for myself, I will be happy to answer your question. |
22 June 2007 | |
Thank you!
I'm studying Recapture of Alimony. The materials are telling me that this provision is intended to prevent large property settlements from being treated as alimony. I have never reported alimony on either side of the fence, so I guess I'm naive about it. Plus I don't have a "criminal" mind so efforts to avoid taxes aren't always obvious to me until I've completely taken the picture apart and put it back together again. Using the example in the materials, Joe is paying alimony to Mary. Setting up my own example, Joe paid Mary $75K the first year, $40K the second, and $10K the third. I understand how this qualifies for the recapture (I don't understand why or how Joe would do this). I think I understand the calculation except for what to do in the third year. I understand how to calculate the 3rd year recapture, but (and I'm sorry if this is obvious) does Joe deduct the $10K and then claim $15K and $32,200 ($15K being 2nd year recapture and $32,200 being 1st year recapture). Or does Joe wait until the 4th year? And I'm assuming that Joe is being a bad boy and trying to get away with something, so all of this would only come up when Mary or the IRS blows the whistle on him (or his tax accountant). Am I close? Pat P |
22 June 2007 | |
The recapture rules for excess front-loading of alimony were enacted to provide a mechanical test for distinguishing property settlement payments from alimony payments. The recapture rules do not apply if the alimony ceases before the end of the third year as a result of the remarriage or death of the payee spouse. The recapture rules are self-imposed, and it is the preparer’s responsibility to catch this. There is no “whistle” to blow.
Incidentally, the recapture amounts are $15,000 for the second year payments and $42,500 for the first year payments. There is software available to compute the recapture income, which in this case is $57,500. The payor of the alimony simply deducts the alimony as he normally would for all three years. In the third year, he would include the $57,500 recapture income in gross income, and the payee spouse would claim a deduction for the recapture income. |
22 June 2007 | |
PatP
FWIW - formula to remember. It's not as hard as it first looks. Y1,Y2,Y3 are the alimony payments for the 3 years. A = Y2 - Y3 - 15,000 B = Y1 - ((Y2 + Y3 - A)/2) - 15000 Recapture = A + B In your example A = 40,000 - 10,000 - 15,000 = 15,000 B = 75,000 - ((40,000 + 10,000 - 15,000)/2) - 15,000 = 75,000 - (35,000/2) -15,000 = 42,500 Recapture = 15,000 + 42,500 = 57,500 (just as Riley said) |
One caveat - A must be zero or greater. No negative numbers.
22 June 2007 | |
memorize that, and 999 other possible formulas you might need, and you're sure to get at least 25% correct on the exam. Good luck.
That is to say, the exam is quite all encompasing. When you find such a formula, work through 2 or 3 examples, it will help you remember the concept better than just memorizing a formula. Some people are auditory learners and need to hear tapes or a live classroom, some are visual learners and do fine with just reading material, others are kinesthetic and need to work through the problems until they've gotten a feel for the concept. Do not rule out taking a live course when preparing. It won't be enough on its own, but it will reinforce your memory and point out areas you need to spend more time on. |
29 June 2007 | |
Thanks everyone for your responses. Sorry to be so long getting back, this is my first night back to studying since I posted the question. I understand the concept now. Kevin, I appreciate the humor of memorizing all of the formulas. Your suggestion is good one to work through the problems. And Riley, thank God for software! But, as I understand it, I'm gonna have to actually figure it out myself on the test. Peyton, I appreciate your graphic. I am a visual and hands on learner. Auditory does me no good. I'm really not focusing primarily on this one aspect, its just the first one thats thrown me a curve. Thanks again everybody. |
29 June 2007 | |
Okay, I just worked through about 6 problems. I think I've got it (but I didn't on the first two attempts). Would you mind seeing if you get what I got?
Y1 = $50,000 Y2 = $47,230 Y3 = $28,900 Recapture = $1,930 Again, thanks so much. I'm going to move on to another area now, but I'll check back. |
TheTinCook (talk|edits) said: | 29 June 2007 |
For what its worth, there weren't any questions about alimony recapture when I took Part 1 the other week. I did have around 3 questions about the Child Dependent Care credit.
Pat, you'll do great if you don't panic. This may sound cynical, but you only need a 70% to pass, so you have room to relax. You should also take "full" practice exam at least once so you can focus on your weak areas, and use your time better. Did you schedule a exam date yet? I didn't get serious about reviewing until I set the dates. Gleim Part 2 was a great help, and I passed Part 2 last Monday. I've got Part 3 on July third. Based on the review it seems easier then the other two part. At least the review guide is half the size.
|
29 June 2007 | |
Pat
$1,930 is correct!!! I can give you a simplified version of the formula (a CAVEAT - this will not work if A is negative). Recapture = Y1 + Y2 - 2Y3 - 37500 In your case Rec = 50,000 + 47,230 - 2(28,900) - 37,500 = 97,230 - 95,300 = $1,930 |
29 June 2007 | |
Congratulations TinCook! I have set my date for Part I. We are in the beginning of putting an addition on our house as owner/contractors because my mom needs to move in with us. Couldn't help the timing of that. So, I didn't want to overwhelm myself by setting all three dates. But I do agree that having the date in place is a great motivator. I hope to move my date up for Part I, but I'm not going to kill myself.
Peyton, I would love to have a mind like yours! The first time I saw the SS Worksheet, I thought, who in the world came up with this thing!!! Probably somebody like you, LOL. But now that I've broken it down into simple (?) math, it make a little more sense. I still think its pretty contrived, but at least I see where it's coming from. Anyway, thanks for the formula. Keep 'em coming! |
29 June 2007 | |
Actually, the correct amount is $3,330. Remember, you cannot go below zero on any of your steps. |
30 June 2007 | |
Congrats TinCook! But Pat, the questions TinCook had on his Part 1 may not be the same questions you get for yours. The questions are pulled at random from a "pool" of questions that we (2 IRS employees and 7 EA tax Subject Matter Experts) didn't throw out. Kevinh5 |
TheTinCook (talk|edits) said: | 30 June 2007 |
Thanks for the congrats! I should have mentioned the part about the pool of questions. The test was well written. I almost missed a couple of those tricky "are" vs "are not" type of questions. |
TheTinCook (talk|edits) said: | 4 July 2007 |
Okay, I passed Part 3, and Kevinh5 was correct. It was by far the easiest of the three. If I had to take it again, I would have spent some more time memorizing the penalties.
|
4 July 2007 | |
Well congratulations TIN!!! I am sure you are very proud and excited. For a background check it is most likely similar to a CPA background check. You have to not have any items on your record which would result in a disbarment for attorneys or CPAs as I understand it. I am sure you will be fine...
Forget about all those misdemeaners...hehehehe |
5 July 2007 | |
Congrats. The IRS will also now check that you filed all required returns (personal, entity, and payroll) on time (or within valid extensions) and that everything on your return looks "normal". I remember being worried because I had paid a small Form 2210 underpayment penalty the prior year for not sending in enough estimated tax. It was no problem, but it did worry me. |
TheTinCook (talk|edits) said: | 6 July 2007 |
Thanks Sandy and Kevinh5! Sandy-Thankfully no misdemeaners. I only filed a sales tax return late. I'm not too worried about the background check, but I worry how long it will take.
This forum was a tremendus help in preparing for the test. I love the box(the yellow one, not the stupid one). So thanks to all the contributers for helping me understand various issues. Now, I just have to parley passing the SEE into a better job. |
6 July 2007 | |
Tin:
After I passed I sent in the form 23 late January 2007 & did not get my licence until the 3rd week of May. So it will probably be close to the 120 days. |
6 July 2007 | |
My experience was about 5 months from submitting the form to getting the certificate. As far as the better job goes, it was the best career choice I made in this business. It gives you a lot more flexibility than just working as a preparer. |
TheTinCook (talk|edits) said: | 12 July 2007 |
Thanks for your replies Cttax and GeoEA1065! I was afraid it would take that long.
The IRS cashed my check today, so I'll start running the clock now. ~119 days to go! |