To join in on this discussion, you must first log in.

Discussion:H/W election to treat LLC as a sole prop

From TaxAlmanac, A Free Online Resource for Tax Professionals
Note: You are using this website at your own risk, subject to our Disclaimer and Website Use and Contribution Terms.

From TaxAlmanac

Jump to: navigation, search

Discussion Forum Index --> Advanced Tax Questions --> H/W election to treat LLC as a sole prop


Discussion Forum Index --> Tax Questions --> H/W election to treat LLC as a sole prop

Cottcpa (talk|edits) said:

8 March 2009
H/W are equal members of an LLC - the articles of organization explicitly state the LLC will be treated as a disregarded entity. Both materially participate. For this purpose, does filing two Sch C's serve as an effective election to report as a sole proprietorship, or is there a separate form required to effectuate the election to not treat as a partnership?

Kevinh5 (talk|edits) said:

8 March 2009
YEAH, not getting an LLC. The IRS' position is that the existence of a state created/sanctioned entity (the LLC) negates the QJV election (in non-CP states). Riley2 has pointed out that there is no basis in law for this, but you've got to decide which will cost more: the fee for doing the 1065, or the fee for representing them?

IDrinkYour Milkshake (talk|edits) said:

8 March 2009
Community property state?

Cottcpa (talk|edits) said:

8 March 2009
yes, community property state

IDrinkYour Milkshake (talk|edits) said:

8 March 2009
Generally, this would be a SMLLC then, unless this property is separate by law.

IDrinkYour Milkshake (talk|edits) said:

8 March 2009
BTW, only ONE Schedule C (joint). (see below)

Cottcpa (talk|edits) said:

8 March 2009
so one schedule C and check that business operated jointly? thanks for the help.

As for non-community property state, what about a situation like this - where the entity is created under state law and the election to treat as a disregarded entity is made at the time creation? That's appears irrelevant for my purposes, but I'm just curious.

Harry Boscoe (talk|edits) said:

8 March 2009
Curious, I went to the Schedule C instructions, and they said that the husband and wife, as part of making the "Qualified Joint Venture" election, should file *two* Schedule C's [or C-EZ's, or F's], reporting their respective shares of the income and expenses separately. Did I miss something in those instructions?

IDrinkYour Milkshake (talk|edits) said:

8 March 2009
QJV election not made, as far as from what I've read.

IDrinkYour Milkshake (talk|edits) said:

8 March 2009
I misread, you're right. Two Schedule C's

IDrinkYour Milkshake (talk|edits) said:

8 March 2009
Missed the "both materially participate" line.

Cottcpa (talk|edits) said:

9 March 2009
so back to my initial question, is there an actual form to make the QJV election?

IDrinkYour Milkshake (talk|edits) said:

9 March 2009
no

Harry Boscoe (talk|edits) said:

9 March 2009
"...is there an actual form...?"

No, the instructions pretty much say you elect it by doing it.

According to IRS's website, however, an LLC - even though it's owned by husband and wife - is not eligible to make the QJV election. However, there's a Rev Proc from 2002 that seems to apply somehow in community property states to dilute that. Maybe, if memory serves, the Rev Proc was 2002-69. It's here on taxalmanac.com.

I live elsewhere and don't consider myself competent to discuss community property issues.

Cottcpa (talk|edits) said:

9 March 2009
thanks Harry - and Milkshake.

Somewhat related - I recall that one of the Kiplinger letters last Spring had a note about the IRS making it easier for husband & wife LLCs to report on Schedule C for tax years beginning 2008. Does this mean anything to either of you?

Kevinh5 (talk|edits) said:

9 March 2009
Harry, don't let a lack of competence get in your way of expressing your opinion. That's what the internet was invented for!

Riley2 (talk|edits) said:

9 March 2009
A QJV election does not need to be made if the LLC interests are held solely as community property, in which case they should simply file 2 Schedule C's.

Harry Boscoe (talk|edits) said:

9 March 2009
Isn't QVC what the plastic pipe in my house is mad eout of? No, strike that; I promised not to post confusing and misleading irrelevancy until tomorrow.

IDrinkYour Milkshake (talk|edits) said:

9 March 2009
Good, I'm keeping tabs Harry :)

To join in on this discussion, you must first log in.
Personal tools