Discussion:EA Exam

From TaxAlmanac, A Free Online Resource for Tax Professionals
Note: You are using this website at your own risk, subject to our Disclaimer and Website Use and Contribution Terms.

From TaxAlmanac

Jump to: navigation, search

Discussion Forum Index --> Business Growth Community --> EA Exam


Rgtaxservice (talk|edits) said:

29 April 2007
Now the fun really begins. I've started to study and pre-test for the EA Exam. I'm using the Gleim Study guides. I haven't scheduled the exam yet. I figure late summer or mid fall. I want to allow myself the time to study and learn.

I'll use this study time to reflect and find my 'inner tax practitioner'.

Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said:

29 April 2007
Good luck!

Rgtaxservice (talk|edits) said:

29 April 2007
Thanks D&T. I've been wanting to take this exam for a while now. It's a personal goal to me. It's another rung on the ladder.

Unlike CPA, most people (clients) don't know what EA stands for. Enrolled is easy, but once you utter the word Agent people tend to couple it with IRS and the room gets very quiet. You can see the wheel turning in their heads as they think you are and IRS Agent...and they just mentioned 'off the books'.

With any luck, a few of my problem clients will either be scared straight or take a hike.

Bottom Line (talk|edits) said:

29 April 2007
It's been so long since I studied (and I never really studied then) that it will be hard for me to get into the swing of it. I also am planning on sitting for the EA. I'm going to take a few classes this summer and begin studying with the goal of taking the test next summer.

Rgtaxservice (talk|edits) said:

29 April 2007
Although I've just started my study routine, I find that the Gleim study guide is very helpful. Just based on the short period that I've been using it, I would recommend it.

I spent $270 for the books and test cd (3 parts). I opted out of the online option...it's the same as the CD minus the online counselor.

Actionbsns (talk|edits) said:

29 April 2007
Rg, your mention of the IRS and Agent, reminds me of a story. I had just finished my exams and had been awarded the EA when we met some family members and their friends in Las Vegas. We were all sitting around having dinner at a restaurant when one of the friends started talking about retiring and selling his store. He was full of bravado and himself and was making comments that would make any IRS agent just itch to get in and take a bette look. In a lull in his verbocity, my husband said to him "Paula's an enrolled agent with the IRS." You never saw someone go redder, and become more quiet so fast in your life. There was a very pregnant pause at the table and then the noisy guy blustered that "IRS agents ought to be required to let people know they are present!!!" He didn't have much more to say on the topic the rest of the evening.

Good luck with your studying and with the test.

Bottom Line (talk|edits) said:

29 April 2007
Now that's funny!!

Cttax (talk|edits) said:

29 April 2007
I took the EA tests last November & passed all 3. I used the Gleim CD's & books also. Mostly they were very good. I found that business study guides were right in sync with the tests but that the personal were quite as good. . I remember on the personal test there were several questions about insurance trusts that I did not have a clue. Just an FYI & good luck.

Kevinh5 (talk|edits) said:

29 April 2007
Go to the Thomson Prometric website, register, and download the recommended reading/study list. Read EVERY pub listed in addition to taking a class (or self-study book).

The new test does not rely on the old test - all of the questions are new, though some may be similar. The old questions were written by IRS employees. The new questions were written by practicing EAs who want you to have a certain level of competency before admitting you to the tax expert "club".

MIG999 (talk|edits) said:

30 April 2007
I took the exams in November and passed all 3. I found the NATP course to be quite helpful. I did not find the test terrible difficult.

Rgtaxservice (talk|edits) said:

2 May 2007
I'm finding that the study guides are working quite well. I seem to make stupid mistakes on items that I know and misread the question or read too much into the question. The answer review is really helps in strengthening my knowledge on why I got it right, and pointing to my erred ways when I don't.

All in all it's staring to get fun (isn't that sick?). Well, it's back to books

- Rick

Sandysea (talk|edits) said:

2 May 2007
Yes RICK...you are definitely SICK. Do you also read the Master Tax Guide for fun? hehehehe

Hellothere (talk|edits) said:

2 May 2007
I passed the exam by using the materials from the Phoenix Tax Group. The study cards were very helpful since I was able to carry them around with me and study whenever I had a minute.

Good luck with your studies!!!

Sarami (talk|edits) said:

16 November 2007
Has anyone recently purchased WiseGuides?

I found that the 3rd part contains comparatively less questions than the other two. The 3rd part has just 186 questions in total, when the second part has over 400 (not the book it self, but the software). Does it mean that the third part is not that difficult? (I wish!)Or if my version contains an error? I past the first and second parts recently, which were not that bad. I think that the WiseGuide helped a lot. I am taking the third part next week, and I feel completely lost since I don't have any experience in this area.

TheTinCook (talk|edits) said:

16 November 2007
The third section covers less material for sure. If you passed parts one and two, you should have no problem passing part three. You also might want to broaden your reading with Pub 594 and Pub 556.

The trickiest part for me was figuring out all the SOLs for refunds.

Donniecastleman (talk|edits) said:

16 November 2007
I had really good luck with Lambers EA review by Arthur Reed, passed all 4 parts the first time (isn't it three parts now?) so it may be worth checking out if you have the time, anyway I have to give credit where credit is due. Good luck with the exam, I should have done the EA thing years ago instead of waiting until 2005.

Kathyt (talk|edits) said:

16 November 2007
I used WiseGuides & passed all 4 parts with flying colors the first time. But that was before they changed the test.

Sarami (talk|edits) said:

25 November 2007
Passed the last part!

TheTinCook (talk|edits) said:

25 November 2007
Congrats Sarami!

Inagpurwala (talk|edits) said:

26 November 2007
Passed 1st and 3rd part in one try. I will try 2nd part second time next month (December 2007).Inagpurwala 17:37, 26 November 2007 (CST)

Threefeet (talk|edits) said:

28 November 2007
I had good luck with NATP online course. I took the exam last summer and passed all four parts. (I was really surprised!) Good luck because your brain will hurt until after you take the exam!

Vermontcpa (talk|edits) said:

29 November 2007
Taking the EA exam (individuals) next week.. any words of wisdom on overly weighted areas to prepare for? I am using the Gleim program to prepare.

Kevinh5 (talk|edits) said:

29 November 2007
That section should be the easiest of the three assuming that you have done 1040 tax returns including schedules A, B, C, and D. I would think that you would want to know about alimony recapture, wash sales, filing status, refundable and non-refundable credits, AMT, SE tax and the computation for SE HI and retirement plans for the SE'ed. Probably stuff that you have already seen in real life.

EA Subject Matter Experts are currently writing some new questions as Prometric will rotate the question pool.


DO let us know when you pass all 3 parts and PLEASE give us feedback in comparison with the CPA exam that you have passed.

ThinkTax (talk|edits) said:

29 November 2007
Passed both. CPA exam is significantly hardly in that it covers a broader range of items for testing.

ThinkTax (talk|edits) said:

29 November 2007
"significantly hardly" - let's try "significantly harder" :)

Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said:

29 November 2007
You should not say that, Think Tax! Kevin is back to defend the honor of us (we?)(them?) EAs. Image:smile.jpg

Kevinh5 (talk|edits) said:

29 November 2007
No, I wanted an honest opinion.

If the EA exam is so easy, I would think that a CPA could challenge it without having to study. If the CPA exam were easy, there would be a lot more CPAs. Both are difficult.

I wanted an opinion of "here's how they are different" and "here's how they were the same".

Johnhuddleston (talk|edits) said:

29 November 2007
Is there value in having both?

John Huddleston

GeoEA1065 (talk|edits) said:

29 November 2007
I have taken and passed both (except Auditing which I am retaking tomorrow). If we are talking about the whole exam than the CPA is harder hands down. Mainly because it covers a much larger amount of material: economics, IT, Cost Accounting, GAAP etc etc....if we mean on tax than the EA had more diffecult tax questions than did the CPA regulation section. Tax is just 60% of one section of a four section test. CPA exam is a mile wide and an inch deep. The EA was only a quarter mile wide but a lot deeper.

Kevinh5 (talk|edits) said:

29 November 2007
So if you are taking the CPA exam you had better be prepared for a long walk, but if you are taking the EA exam you had better know how to swim?

Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said:

29 November 2007
I only wish I had copies of the questions for the years I passed the EA Exam; I think it was 1983 and 1994 but am not sure. I'd be curious to see what was included then and now.

Wonderful analogy, Kevin!!!

ThinkTax (talk|edits) said:

30 November 2007
Neither exam is "easy." The EA exam certainly drills deeper into the tax arena than does the CPA exam. The CPA exam, of course, deals with areas in which a tax accountant does not practice (nor cares to practice), e.g., auditing & fiancial reporting. I was a tax manager at a CPA firm as an EA long before I was a CPA (which is recently). The only reason I even took the CPA exam was for marketability.

Interestingly, from the recent stats I've read, the section of the CPA exam that has the lowest pass rate is REG (Regulations) which contains federal taxation.

I always stay away from the we/them controversy. To me, it boils down to the person and not the credentials. I know CPAs and EAs who are absolutely brilliant. I also know CPAs and EAs that, for the life of me, I don't know how they could even pass a driving test.

Vermontcpa (talk|edits) said:

8 December 2007
passed individuals yesterday.. 3 1/2 hours is a ton of time to complete this!.. i was out in under 2 hrs.. taking part 3 the end of the month...

Southparkcpa (talk|edits) said:

8 December 2007
Way back in the mid eighties during trainging at PW (Pre PWC) we discussed the ranking of importance in skills, they called it GAAP, GAAS, TAX.

GAAP was rated number one and the logic is you can't apply tax or audit work to a transaction you don't understand. A capital lease is a perfect example. You can syudy it all dau long but simply miss it when preparing a tax return. Thus whether you are a CPA or EA is arguably secondary to your ability to understand business transactions and people.

Not sure what's on the EA exam but I agree with Thinktax, I have met many awesome tax pro's both CPA's and EA's and many knuckleheads who were CPA's and EA's.

Think about this theory, if you are on TA a few times a week, you are at a minimum curious abot your profession. More than likely you enjoy the profession. That is what helps build skill. I have had several CPA's work for me that were not intuitively curious, received all their training from mandated CPE and their compensation showed it.

Gmikeg (talk|edits) said:

9 December 2007
Nice work Vermontcpa! Had the pleasure of taking the last written test in 2005 in Albuquerque, NM. Just one question that I have for all CPAs that later get their EA: Why? I'm not doubting your desire to expand your horizons, but did you learn a lot of new stuff studying for the EA exam. (I'm not a CPA, just EA)

Also in response to SouthParkcpa; I've been an EA since April '06, and love the challenges of the profession. Met many EAs that don't know jack about tax law, and a few CPAs where I needed to fix there work. I know basic accounting (took I and II), but I don't know jack about GAAP. Do you think I could get a lot out of it? Let me know...

Thanks,

Mike G.,EA

Southparkcpa (talk|edits) said:

9 December 2007
Mike

Not sure why a CPA would take the EA but it's like good soup, Can never hurt! That said........

My practice and focuses on businesses and their owners with sales between 1 mil and 10 mil. As such, whether I like it or not I am confronted with consolidations, mergers, sales, new partners, LP's strange bank financing etc... My favorite saying is that 70 percent of what I do can be done by a 2nd year guy. The other 30 percent is the tough part. Meaning, as you grow, you will be confronted with issues you can't avoid. The last 3 years in my practice have been spent ridding ourselves of work we shouldn't do (small 1040's and corps, write up, local tax work etc...).

In my experience, the 3 classes I highly recommend is Intermediate I and II for the more in depth review of

the BS and P and L  and Business law I.  Contract and employment law are key in my view to good tax work. This is just one opinion. 

By the way, I am originally from Long Island as well. My masters is from CW Post.

Matt

Gmikeg (talk|edits) said:

9 December 2007
My cousin got her accounting degree from CW Post (small world). Nice friggin school!

I got Bus Law I already, great course! My Intermediate Accounting book is sitting on the shelf. I might just sit down and crack it open...

By the way; what's BS and P and L?

Thanks,

Mike

Southparkcpa (talk|edits) said:

11 December 2007
Sorry,

Balance sheet and Profit and loss

Not sure what you mean by nice friggin school. Sarcasm? Post is OK, not great..............

Matt

Boomerblau (talk|edits) said:

11 December 2007
I got my EA first in 2003 and now I've passed all 4 parts of the CPA and jumping through a few final posts.

The sentiment above is really great concerning the depth and bredth of the two exams. A mile wide and an inch deep vs. a quarter mile wide and four feet deep. I'll have to borrow that.

I truly only need the EA, but the public recognition regarding the CPA "brand" will further my practice - and my fees. I look forward to the day where both are equally respected by the public for the two separate functions (assurance vs. representation) that they serve.

Aaron

Micmac (talk|edits) said:

29 December 2007
I'm considering taking the EA exam and was wondering if anyone has used the study kits available at the IRS.gov website and their practice questions to prepare for the exam? Here's the link:

http://www.irs.gov/taxpros/agents/article/0,,id=109302,00.html

Some of the classes/guides/CD/Online help seem a little cost prohibitive. Not sure if appropriate but can one acquire some these study guides second hand? Thanks all!

Rgtaxservice (talk|edits) said:

29 December 2007
I would recommend the Gleim Study Guide. I used it and it worked well. My downside was that I took my time studying and missed my test window. There's always next year.

Micmac (talk|edits) said:

31 December 2007
Thanks for the tip, Rgtaxservice, good luck on the test - I thought the new automated test is open until 02/28/2008 and then opens again on 05/01/2008? Maybe I am wrong but I think it's in this link somewhere:

http://www.prometric.com/NR/rdonlyres/eajqgs36mjpozcwifkywhkke7iuekusbuncejvfhis75itq3d46jzhzilg2ov7u5nznnwki2rw5rf5jgg6jopl7nlhb/IRSCIB20071126.pdf

I found this a heplful link with lots of info. Again, good luck!

Shaunna (talk|edits) said:

31 December 2007
I took the test two years ago and missed passing all parts by missing 7points in what was then section 3. Since then they have actually made the test easier by allowing the test to be taken one part at a time. However, they also made my life difficult by merging previous sections 2 & 3 together to form just part 2 which is ALL business questions from Sch C to S-Corp to Partnership to Fiduciary all in the same section. The also don't tell you what you missed or what you didn't miss anymore (unless they changed that).

I will say that having to restudy for those two sections was a pain but I did find the part two a lot easier! I became official this year!

Unfortunately, for me, what I discovered is that not having my CPA is causing me to lose clients that I could otherwise have. So, now I have a goal to get back to school and get it done.

Vermontcpa (talk|edits) said:

2 January 2008
I passed parts 1 individual and 3 procedures in December 2007.. taking 2 business in Feb.

Gleim study is the way to go and is what I have used. Books and CD with test questions only.. all else seems not necessary.

Keep in mind I do have two full seasons of tax work going into these exams.. also a CPA.

Uncle Sam (talk|edits) said:

2 January 2008
Vermont-you're in the same position as my wife. She's got Parts 1 and 3 done, now Part 2.

And she's using Gleim. Gleim got her through the other 2 parts.

Shaunna (talk|edits) said:

2 January 2008
Vermount - why if you have your CPA are you taking the exam? You can already represent clients before the IRS.

Micmac (talk|edits) said:

2 January 2008
Were the study questions provided by Gleim very helpful or just a little helpful. I know the exam questions are now being written by EA's and this only started in May 2007. Has Gleim been able to accomodate for this? Thanks for the responses and tips, they help.

Rgtaxservice (talk|edits) said:

2 January 2008
Gleim study questions/guides were very helpful. For me the key was constantly testing and reviewing.

EAinCA (talk|edits) said:

2 January 2008
I just passed part 1 of the EA, but in addition to the Gleim review, I took a seminar by Bob Arthur that I found very helpful. The website is www.eareview.com and they have seminars in the Summer/Fall, although I do not think the 2008 dates are posted yet.

Vermontcpa (talk|edits) said:

3 January 2008
I wanted to do something with downtime during tax season and I decided on this endeavor. It has served as a good refresher for me as well as getting into the details of certain areas my practice has not encountered. Eventually I will be have both credentials which can't hurt.

I found certain questions on EA exam where not even covered by Gleim.. Overall you are getting enough of the exam topics to be able to pass. I still would recommend Gleim.. I have done all the online updates so don't give me that tip.

Vermontcpa (talk|edits) said:

3 January 2008
that should read downtime during NON tax season...

Uncle Sam (talk|edits) said:

4 January 2008
The question was raised - if you're a CPA, why get the EA?

Well - the answer is simple. If you anything at all about this country's accountancy laws, you'd know that the CPA credential is a STATE license. The EA is a FEDERAL license. Not every state has reciprocity with respect to recognizing another state's CPA license - whereas the EA is recognized all over the country.

So - if at some point in the future you wish to move to another state and still wish to have gainful employment without having to go through the licensing procedure a second time, the EA license provides you that mobility.

Shaunna (talk|edits) said:

5 January 2008
Well, Uncle Sam - your name is quite appropriate with the comment:) That is a point that I had not thought about. thanks!!

Lmcdon9822 (talk|edits) said:

13 January 2008
Hi all

Coming from an engineering/programming background (B.S. in Electrical Engineering and M.S. in Infromation Systems) I cannot take the CPA exam based on the educational requirements. I don't have enough credits or non at all in accounting, business or taxation at the college level. I have been preparing income taxes for 10+ years and will be taking the EA exam later this year.

As most folks said in the post, CPA name recognition is key for higher fees. The setback is if you move to a different state you may need to sit for the exam again.

ThinkTax (talk|edits) said:

13 January 2008
Lmcdon9822: The setback is if you move to a different state you may need to sit for the exam again.

That's not really the case. Most states, if not all, have reciprocity rules.

Micmac (talk|edits) said:

23 June 2008
Has anyone taken the exam recently? I am taking part 1 next week.

EAinCA (talk|edits) said:

6 July 2008
Micmac - I just took part 3 on July 3rd and passed (just waiting on the form 23 approval). Good luck on part 1, have you taken the other parts yet?

DianeM (talk|edits) said:

29 July 2008
Looking for study aids for EA test. Lots of people reference Gleim, but their prices are up there. Also looked at Exam Matrix. Seems that Exam Matrix is mostly online with little printed to study from. Call me old fashioned, but I like to use a book -- not outlines -- a textbook. Just went to Wiseguides website and see that prices are MUCH more reasonable. They have books and software. Someone told me that their materials have changed quite a bit in the last year. More in their text books, more questions and answers and they also have flashcards (electronic on a CD). Asked around to see if others liked using Wiseguides and got good comments. Definitely worth checking out. - DM

Sjpaccounting (talk|edits) said:

10 October 2008
I just passed part 1 of the EA exam yesterday!! I will study for part 3 next. I used the Gleim study. I did notice that they did not put all the information on the test in their study guides, but like a previous poster said, obviously there was enough for me to pass. It was a lot harder then I thought it was going to be, but I am quite relieved. I am not a good test taker at all!

NMexEA (talk|edits) said:

10 October 2008
I passed all three Parts starting last September and finishing in January. I used Phoenix Tax materials exclusively.

Parts 1 and 3 held no surprises. Part 2 asked for several Form numbers, stuff I would know if I had any real experience.

Other than that I passed each Part, I have no idea how well (or poorly) I did since Prometric doesn't tell you.

Philia2 (talk|edits) said:

10 October 2008
I passed part one last month and I got part 2 and part 3 scheduled for the end of October. I agree with Sjp that it was tough! I don't have too much tax experience so remembering all the form numbers is a bit tricky. Good luck with the other parts!

Jm76 (talk|edits) said:

13 October 2008
Hi There - I recently passed all 3 parts (Just passed the last part 2 days back) and I'm looking for some guidance on completing the Form 23. There is a question in the form which asks if you've been convicted or fined $500 or more, for violating any las, exclusing traffic tickets. Unfortunately, couple of years back, I was stopped and charged for a DUI. I've paid all the fines and finished all the classes. Should this be disclosed (as in is this a traffic violation or ??) and will this affect my registration.

Kevinh5 (talk|edits) said:

13 October 2008
not disclosing it will affect your registration because they can find out

they really are looking for monetary/trust/ethics convictions

Jm76 (talk|edits) said:

13 October 2008
Thanks, I'm definitely not thinking about hiding it.I'm sure they will find out if they run a report. Will it by any chance affect my chances of getting registered / approved.

Kevinh5 (talk|edits) said:

13 October 2008
unless you committed some other crime while intoxicated, I wouldn't worry about it. Besides, you can't change the past, you can only learn from it. Stop worrying and start living. Just do it carefully.

NMexEA (talk|edits) said:

14 October 2008
If I were you, I'd attach a separate sheet of paper saying whether you pleaded guilty or went to trial, what the sentence was, that you have done everthing required, and most importantly, whether you have gotten your driving privileges back. Here's why:

It is unlikely, I think, that a first offense DUI will keep OPR from issuing your Treasury card. However, should they decide against you, you need a solid record for appeal to the Secretary (I think it is). The thing you need to show is that this was an isolated incident, that you have learned from your mistake, and that you don't require a further period to demonstrate "rehabilitation" before you can be trusted with enrollment. Showing them what you've done about it will help a lot.

Finally, if you do need to appeal a denial, spend the money for a decent administrative law lawyer. This is no time for DIY. Even if you aren't all that anxious to be enrolled, OPR's denial will become part of the record you will have to explain whenever you seek any other government license in the future.

Philia2 (talk|edits) said:

14 October 2008
Jm76, congrats of passing the SEE! What were your feelings/thoughts about the tests, for how long have you prepared, and what study material did you use?

Yes, I have wondered about the background check myself. I just became a permanent resident less than a year ago, and I guess that they can't really see much about me (except one tax return and a newly created credit).

How long does it normally take for them to do the check?

NMexEA (talk|edits) said:

14 October 2008
FWIW, OPR had my card to me almost exactly 90 days after I sent them the Form 23. They are supposed to send you a letter acknowledging receipt of your application and fee. They did but I didn't get the letter until about two and a half months after sending in the application. In other words, I got the Treasury card two weeks after getting the letter.

I suspect that the background check is a "no news is good news" sort of thing. If they don't know much but what little they know isn't negative, they'll issue the card.

Jm76 (talk|edits) said:

15 October 2008
Thanks NMexEA - I just did exactly what you said yday and sent the papers in. Unfortunately, I didn't read your post before i sent it, if not, I would have elaborated more on that.

As for my test experience, I've been working in individual taxes for the last 8 years. The individual and the review part was pretty simple. Took one in Nov 06 and the other in May 07 and the business in Oct 08.

I studied from the Gleim course review. It was very helpful, & I can say that most, if not all (at least 75%) of the questions at the test were almost the same or very simillar to the practice questions in the book/CD. The CD has more questions than the book. The business section was slightly harder but again, I would say, you need to complete the entire book and then do all the question and you should be fine. I sat once for Indiv and review since I was very comfortable with that. As for business, I took it twice with 1 week gap between the two. I just wanted to take it to see what kind of questions and if I needed more preparation (I was exactly half way through my studying at that time). Based on the results, I did pretty well for just completing half of the coursework. Came back, studied for a week (4-5 hrs a day) and finished the entire coursework and also, did 85% of the questions from the Gleim CD. Took the test 1 week later and it was pretty simple. All in all, I would say, try using a course review (Gleim worked for me), but make sure to stick to the plan and finishing the practice questions. You dont really learm much from the 4/5 pages of outline, but more so from the questions (when you get it right, read the other answer options to see why they are wrong, & when you get the answer wrong, read why they were wrong). Basically, it took me 3 to 4 hours for each topic (outline & practice questions). Business had 20 units.

NMexEA (talk|edits) said:

15 October 2008
Cir. 230 itself says what sort of incidents may result in denial of an application for enrollment. They refer to the list of things that can get a practitioner disciplined so the test is theoretically the same. I'd guess that it isn't, really. It's harder to suspend an existing enrollment than it is to deny an application for original enrollment and I imagine OPR tries to screen out potential "problem" EAs before they happen. I sure would.

Anyway, DUI doesn't appear on the list at all (though if you have enough of them to reach felony status, that might be a problem). So relax, put your feet up, and enjoy a (root)beer!

Congratulations!

Jm76 (talk|edits) said:

17 October 2008
Thanks for responding. Yep, just gonna wait it out and see how it goes.

Jm76 (talk|edits) said:

28 October 2008
Guys - Just wanted to send you a quick note to let you know that I just received the certificate today.... Just in 2 weeks. Pretty cool eh..

Philia2 (talk|edits) said:

28 October 2008
Wow! 2 weeks?!!

I got my last two exams later this week (Thursday and Friday). I am so impatient to have it done!

Congratulations!

TaxSense (talk|edits) said:

28 October 2008
I just passed the last part on October 7 and sent my Form 23 the same day. I got my acknowledgment letter today. So, it looks like Jm76 sent his Form 23 in on October 14 and got his enrollment card two weeks later, while NMexEA said it took 90 days (and got the letter two weeks before he got the card). I checked with the instructor I took a review course with and he said he's been hearing about 2-3 weeks. Even though the IRS web site says 120 days and the letter I got today says 60 days from receipt of the Form 23, it looks like there is a wide discrepancy in time. It may have to do with the background check, but it would be nice to know what to expect. It seems there is no rhyme or reason even though it appears everything goes out of one IRS office in Michigan. Either way, it shouldn't be much longer...it would be nice to have so I can hang out my shingle!

Kinson (talk|edits) said:

28 October 2008
I've been using the Phoenix Tax Group's study guides. I have been reading the cards and then using the computerized practice tests provided. The books of questions are the same as those on the computer tests, only not mixed up. So far so good. Passed part 1 two weeks ago have parts 2 and 3 next week.

I did recently pass an Income Tax I and II course in college that was using current information used on this years test, and, am using that text book as a secondary source of studying. Because of that Phoenix can not take the full credit for me passing all three tests (provided I do pass all three).

Philia2 (talk|edits) said:

28 October 2008
This might be a silly question but do you think that I should make a copy of my permanent resident card and send it with the Form 23? Do you think this could "speed up" or help with the back ground check? I really appreciate your input. Thanks.

Jm76 (talk|edits) said:

28 October 2008
Hey guys - I sent my form 23 to Culver Street, CA. I'm not sure where you guys are getting the MI address. The form 23 lists the CA address

Vermontcpa (talk|edits) said:

15 November 2008
I passed part 2 of EA exam yesterday! Lots of time preparing for this one. I know basis now baby! A couple forms were not even covered in Gleim but still I got it locked up on first try. I had intended to take it in Feb 2008 but with tax season load never could get to the material.

Forms that came up were would a prohibited retirement trx be reported.. what is the answer on this?

I mailef form 23 in yesterday to CA address as indicated in form 23 instructions.. keep in mind this form was just recently revised so perhaps new mailing address reflected on the Oct 2008 version.

One thing that surprised is that there were fewer questions that really involved using the online calculator.. most were conceptual. I honestly expected to see more with a degree of problem solving and requiring the calculator. Not complaining .. just making an observation.

NMexEA (talk|edits) said:

16 November 2008
Apparently, some states consider representation to be an act falling under their CPA statute so a CPA has to have that state's license to accept clients in that state. This amazes me and I don't know whether it would hold up to a legal challenge but there it is.

So Vermontcpa is maybe earning some cheap insurance! (And learning basic basis ;-])

Kinson (talk|edits) said:

16 November 2008
Tax taught in school is conceptual, too. If you understand the concepts you aren't in over your head the following year when all the numbers change.

Kidnapjennalee (talk|edits) said:

24 November 2008
are there IRS/Prometric study materials other than the publications (on IRS website) and outline of subject matter (on prometric website)?

Philia2 (talk|edits) said:

24 November 2008
Kidnapjen, have you tried to do a search?

NMexEA (talk|edits) said:

24 November 2008
K-J

I don't believe that there are any other materials on the sites. I have to say, too, that trying to prepare for the SEE using the forms and publications is probably a false economy. Part of preparing is learning how to answer the kinds of questions IRS asks.

This is especially true since the SEE has a "nondisclosed" question pool. You need a structured approach to review such as a commercial prep course. You won't get there just by studying old exams. For one thing, those old questions are getting pretty out-of-date.

It CAN be pricey, no doubt. I think Gleim gets about $700 for their course. Phoenix Tax relieved me of about $350 total. But the SEE exam itself costs about $300 total if you pass everything on the first attempt. Retakes add up quickly in money and time not to mention frustration. You might well end up taking a prep course after failing the exam the first time around. And LOTS of people do fail the first time around...

Donniecastleman (talk|edits) said:

24 November 2008
I did Lambers/Arthur Reed EA course on DVD for less than a grand and worth every penny, didn't realize that there were a boatload of study questions included with the course and sat for the exam after just viewing and doing the classroom questions, and passed all 4 parts first time, well it was 4 parts when I took it. The fees to do your EA are way lower than CPA, I got into the CPA exam (pass everything in one window debacle) over 10K before deciding to drop kick it out of my life, best thing I ever did trading it for EA.

Kidnapjennalee (talk|edits) said:

25 November 2008
philia

what do you think?

NMexEA (talk|edits) said:

25 November 2008
Philia2,

You left us all hanging! I had to go to your profile to see that you passed all three Parts! Congratulations!

They don't need a copy of your green card. They can just look you up.

Philia2 (talk|edits) said:

2 December 2008
Hi Norm. Yes I was pretty happy about it myself. It has now been 30 days that I sent in the application form, and still impatiently waiting....

Kidnap, I think that Gleim study is a great choice.

Cotopop (talk|edits) said:

2 December 2008
Kidnapjennalee,

Lambers has review questions from 2006 (all 3 parts ) which I found helpful in studying for the exam. Best of all it's free.

NMexEA (talk|edits) said:

2 December 2008
Cotopop,

I was a bit confused by your post until I realized that the review questions from 2006 are free but the regular Lambers review course is anything but.

Micmac (talk|edits) said:

17 December 2008
I took part 1 and passed first time in July but needed to take an exam for the company I work for with was harder than part 1. Now I can get back to the EA exams and have part 3 scheduled in Jan and part 2 in February.

Can anyone give any insight to my "strategy"? I wanted to get part 3 done ASAP and only have part 2 to focus on. Part 3 according to Gleim's prep seems pretty easy but a lot of opinions on the matter. Thanks all. This forum has been really helpful for me.

NMexEA (talk|edits) said:

17 December 2008
If you passed Part 1 on your first try, you are doing everything right.

Part 3 is the easiest of the three and you shouldn't have any trouble getting through it so long as you understand Cir. 230 and the various penalties, when they apply and how to figure them.

Part 2 presumes that you know something about business law, accounting and finance. Not a lot, not as much as, say, a CPA, but you need to understand the difference between capital assets and inventory, stuff like that. Mostly, you need to know what it is that the tax code is addressing. I recommend that you periodically revisit the syllabus for Part 2 and make SURE that you have studied every entry on it.

Good luck!

NMexEA (talk|edits) said:

17 December 2008
Oh, and make SURE you understand S corps. Really, really sure. From creation through liquidation.

KCGuy (talk|edits) said:

18 December 2008
I am writing my Part 1 tomorrow..how long is it?? I have studied the Gliem course and practiced few tests...I feel okay but there might be some tricky questions...do they tell you the score right after the test or just pass/fail...

Kaitlynaiden (talk|edits) said:

20 December 2008
Cotopop mentioned that the Lamber 2006 review questions were free. Is there a website I can access these questions? I've passed parts 1 and 3 and will be taking part 2 next week. Did part 2 focus alot on farm and fiduciary taxation?

KCGuy (talk|edits) said:

15 February 2009
I just part 2 and it was not that hard as I expected..I passed part 1 in Jan so only part left is 3...I will be taking that next week as that should be the easiest one right?..it only has 7 units on Gliem..

Part 2 was basically keeping Partnerships, Corporations rules straight in your mind..I had side by side notes to make sure I know what is what...they do not tell you the score but I felt like I did very well..there were lot of questions on PSC and Basis in partnerships and C Corps (as far as I can remember)...there were some general questions like 941 and 940 filing requirements which we know any ways as we do it all the time.. After I pass part 3, how do I get my EA number...is there any form that I need to send to IRS...thanks for your input and I was well prepared for the tests..

Kevinh5 (talk|edits) said:

15 February 2009
KCGuy, that may well be one of the questions on the Part 3 exam: what form do you fill out to apply to be an EA?

Seriously, you need to study the practice and procedure rules of being an EA, most of which are found in Circular 230.

KCGuy (talk|edits) said:

15 February 2009
Thanks...I will be starting the CD practice question sessions tomorrow and it should be in there...

NMexEA (talk|edits) said:

15 February 2009
Actually...I think they tell you what to do on each one of the "proof of passing" letters you got when you passed Parts 1 & 2.

Do study for Part 3. The exam cycle ends February 28 and after that, you'll need to wait until May to take it again.

Overall pass rate on Part 3 is a little less than 80%. You'll probably do fine but people DO fail.

KCGuy (talk|edits) said:

24 February 2009
I passed Part 3 today...I filed the form 23 with IRS and wait for the EA number..I want to expand my tax practice now...any ideas..

Kevinh5 (talk|edits) said:

24 February 2009
Congratulations!!!!

I'd recommend getting some more clients!

Kevinh5 (talk|edits) said:

24 February 2009
check out the Business Growth forum for some ideas

NMexEA (talk|edits) said:

24 February 2009
A few issues ago, the EA Journal had an article about adding representation to your tax practice. You might look for it at www.naea.org

The author says that there is a substantial market for these services and gives tips on getting started.

KCGuy (talk|edits) said:

24 February 2009
Great thanks...What rate EA usually charge for that kind of work...I have been charging $100/hr is that low or high...

Irsfixer (talk|edits) said:

24 February 2009
Doesn't this belong in Business Growth?

Kevinh5 (talk|edits) said:

24 February 2009
that's what I tried to imply

Irsfixer (talk|edits) said:

24 February 2009
Kevin, I did not read the thread. Just thought it was agreed all this EA stuff was not of general interest and should not be here.

Kevinh5 (talk|edits) said:

24 February 2009
I don't agree to that conclusion, only to the conclusion that 'how do I grow my business' questions go on the business growth forum.

Irsfixer (talk|edits) said:

24 February 2009
How are questions on how to obtain and maintain your credentials to practice different from, how much you should charge, or the best way to deal with delinquent client accounts?

Kevinh5 (talk|edits) said:

24 February 2009
I think we need a Practice Management forum for all of these type of questions (CPE, licensing, fees, etc). My take on the Growth forum is that it is for growing your business (adding new clients, adding additional services). Maybe we should just rename the Growth forum the Practice Management forum and group all these discussions together - I think that's what you are suggesting too.

NMexEA (talk|edits) said:

24 February 2009
Oh, I imagine that setting fees is of interest to just about anyone posting here...I just wish I had a clue myself.

I've seen EA fee schedules as high as $250/hour for representation but here in New Mexico, few lawyers could get away with charging that much. I don't know what CPAs get but they don't come cheap, nor should they.

Irsfixer (talk|edits) said:

24 February 2009
That would work.

Kevinh5 (talk|edits) said:

24 February 2009
The threads on the Practice Management forum would still be viewable by everyone, NMexEA. Just click on 'All forums' or the specific forum you want to look at. IRSFixer is only interested in tax questions, so he would look only at the 'Tax Forum'

NMexEA (talk|edits) said:

24 February 2009
Which is where it is now.

Gabila100 (talk|edits) said:

8 March 2009
Does anybody know if the exam is different at the beginning of a new season. I wanna take the exams first week of May and i'm not sure if I should expect something different than of the season that ended in February. I'm using Gleim courses.

Kevinh5 (talk|edits) said:

8 March 2009
Gabila, don't quote me on this one, but I do believe that Thomson-Prometric has this figured out.


Spring - lots more questions on things NEW, like babies, and the related child credit, EITC, and dependency questions.


Summer - well, that's the time for June weddings, so you'll see lots of questions on MFJ vs MFS filing, injured and innocent spouse, and, unfortunately, divorce and alimony.


Fall - Tax loss harvesting comes to mind, of course. Probably other Sch D items like wash sales, although that topic also comes up for Spring cleaning.


Winter - that's the season for representation questions - how do you properly represent a taxpayer whose deductions are skating on thin ice, for example.

Kevinh5 (talk|edits) said:

8 March 2009
If you were smart, though, you'd study it all. Who knows if they set the computer clock ahead last night?

Gabila100 (talk|edits) said:

9 March 2009
LOL...Thank you for your reply. :))

What I meant was do they have a different approach at the beginning of a new season. Has anybody noticed along the years if they changed/improved/turn around. For example maybe they focus more on the new rules of 2008 ( in terms of numbers, new allocations, amount on personal deductions etc etc) in the first months. Asking never hurts.

Gabila100 (talk|edits) said:

9 March 2009
By the way. I do have another question. More of a piece of advice.

As i stated in a previous post I'm from Romania and I'm taking this exam because there are a lot of romanian students working/paying taxes in US during a summer. So there's a market here. Recently an agency has started to do returns for some students without having the right to practice before IRS. They simply collect W2 forms, charge students and provide them the service of tax refund. Is this legal? I know for a fact they even use their own address as a shipping address to collect the checks IRS sends while issueing a refund. If this is not legal, where can I make a legal complaint? I mean, I don't think that is correct that I'm going through all this process of taking a license for a right to practice and somebody else can do it just like that. Any opinions?

GoalieEd (talk|edits) said:

11 March 2009
Gabila, you don't have to be enrolled simply to prepare a tax return. You do need to be enrolled to represent a client before IRS (although there is an exclusion for out-of-country represenation).

Gabila100 (talk|edits) said:

11 March 2009
So, what's the point of taking the exam than?

Is it legal what they do right know? Charge the students, collect IRS checks, make the students agreement under which they charge people, all without being an agent? And being out-of-country. I know for a fact they call IRS everytime there's a problem with a student's refund and claim they are that student and try to solve the problem.

From my point of view this is completely illegal and I would like to know where I can make a legal complaint.

AEM CPA (talk|edits) said:

11 March 2009
Anyone can prepare a tax return. It is illegal to represent yourself as a taxpayer if you are not that taxpayer. If you are an EA, you can legally represent the taxpayer (not represent yourself as the taxpayer). Also, being an EA proves that you have an advanced level of tax knowledge that the majority of tax preparers don't, and gives you a competitive advantage.

Remember that your point of view rarely matters with regard to the law.

Gabila100 (talk|edits) said:

11 March 2009
I'm looking at 1040 NR instruction 2008, page 24.

"If you want to allow a friend, family or any other person you choose to discuss your 2008 tax return check the “Yes” box in the Third party Designee". But if you want to allow the paid preparer who signed your return to discuss it with IRS, just enter Preparer in the space for designee's name. ....You are not authorizing the preparer to receive any refund check, bind you to anything( including any additional tax liability), or otherwise represent you before IRS."'

Additionally, I read from from NY 203 I intructions forms.

"If you want the designee to performs those services for you ( the above ones) you must file form POA-1 , Power Of Attorney. "

Back to IRS website, about Power Of Attorney Topic 311 - Power of Attorney Information

If you want someone to represent you before the IRS on a Federal tax matter, file Form 2848 (PDF), Power of Attorney and Declaration of Representative, with the IRS office where you want your representative to act for you. Your representative must be a person authorized to practice before the IRS. Your signature on Form 2848 allows the individual or individuals named to represent you before the IRS and to receive your tax information. Refer to Topic 312, Disclosure Authorizations, if you want to allow a person to receive your tax information, but do not want this person to represent you before the IRS. So, as I see it, it is illegal to receive check refunds, bind people through a contract unless you're authorized to to such a thing, and represent people within IRS without the power to do so. This is more striking since it's a out-of-country situation and rules are less permissive.

What do you say? Is it legal what this agency is doing?

AEM CPA (talk|edits) said:

11 March 2009
I already said it's illegal. What has that to do with you becoming an EA?

Gabila100 (talk|edits) said:

11 March 2009
Well, it does for me. I'm planning to become an EA this year, practice in Bucharest, Romania and this agency is using illegal means of conducting business.

What can I do as a future EA to stop them? Where can I make a legal complaint?

Micmac (talk|edits) said:

22 April 2009
Does anyone want to try a small study group for part 2 of the ea exam? We could maybe use Skype. I've passed parts 1 and 3. I am typically available from 8-10 at night EST. I would like to think that maybe studying with someone would make it more enjoyable.

Micmac (talk|edits) said:

22 April 2009
Oh, also I have been using the Gliem study material to prepare.

NMexEA (talk|edits) said:

23 April 2009
Micmac, you are going to pass Part 2 long before you get anything set up. Good luck!

KCGuy (talk|edits) said:

23 April 2009
I passed all parts as of Feb 16th and I sent the form 23 next day to IRS...I called them and they never pick up the phone..it has been over 60 days and I got a letter that my file has been sent to Washington and I should hear from them in next 60 days...what is going on...is this normal? I do not have felony or any DUI on my record..why it is taking this long?? I worked hard to apps these tests and I just have to keep waiting...anyone one else got that kind of letter...

Micmac (talk|edits) said:

24 April 2009
Thanks for the encouragement NMexEA!

NMexEA (talk|edits) said:

24 April 2009
Yes, 120 days total processing time is normal. Relax. Paranoia isn't indicated unless there's something in your tax transcript that worries you.

KCGuy (talk|edits) said:

19 May 2009
I got the letter from Dept of Treasury that they have approved my application and I should be getting the card in the mail..thanks for your help..Now starts the interesting part of growing my business as an EA..Always a new challenge..

NMexEA (talk|edits) said:

19 May 2009
Congratulations! Now, go join the NAEA!

KCGuy (talk|edits) said:

20 May 2009
I did join NAEA before getting the approval letter...

KCGuy (talk|edits) said:

20 May 2009
I got the letter from Dept of Treasury but sill have not received the EA number...Does that come after some time after the approval..

Highcard (talk|edits) said:

23 May 2009
Hello everyone:


I am seriously considering sitting for the EA exam. I am CPA and JD and think this will really set me up to start my own practice limited to taxes. I want to know the "best" study course to take and why. In addition, I want to ask everyone how much time I should expect to spend studying each night to ensure I pass each part of the exam.

Thank you in advance for your input.

Highcard

KCGuy (talk|edits) said:

27 May 2009
I bought the Gliem CD with a book for each part and I spent around 2-3 hours on each section...there are 12 sections (I think) in first part and 20 in Second part...Third part is only 7 sections, I think...I would sit at night starting around 9pm and finish one section and make notes...after all the sections done, I used to pick random questions by selecting different sections and see how many I get right..This built my confidence and then I just scan through the notes and take more tests...you can simulate a test just like actual test.. I would recommend Gliem CD and book, full package that they sell is not worth spending the money...I bought the full package for first section and for second and third just the book and CD..you can get each one for around $90..I failed first once but then passed all three in a row...

Delia123nyc (talk|edits) said:

28 May 2009
I passed the first 2 parts on first tries, but failed the 3rd part recently, I'm study to make 2nd attempt soon, but like to know:

Is the 2nd or 3rd try test exactly teh same as the 1st try test? or there is a question pool with more than 100 questions and in each test the questions are random pop up?

thanks,

KCGuy (talk|edits) said:

28 May 2009
The questions are pulled out of pool of questions...you might get few same questions but mostly different...Questions are random..

AEM CPA (talk|edits) said:

28 May 2009
Was that a serious question?

AEM CPA (talk|edits) said:

28 May 2009
This thread just became the 161st member of the prestigious 5,000 View Club, and cracked into the top 10 of all-time most replies in a thread.

No, Crow, it's not like the Mile High Club.

Melissa1234 (talk|edits) said:

15 June 2012
Do I need to know all the specific dollar amounts and specific form numbers for the ea exam or is there some information provided to you?

To join in on this discussion, you must first log in.
Personal tools