Discussion Archives:Employee with fake SSN - now what?
From TaxAlmanac
Discussion Forum Index --> General Chat --> Employee with fake SSN - now what?
17 January 2011 | |
Long story short, fairly new client had an employee for 10+ years. Employee gave employer client a fake ssn when hired. Employer paid employee $1,500 in 2010. During a NCESC unemployment tax audit in early 2010, it was discovered that this employee's ssn was fake. Employer immediately terminated employee. We intend to file the W2 with no SSN and attach a letter regarding why no SSN. Sound correct? |
January 17, 2011 | |
Is this a case of ID theft? If so, there may be other issues to deal with. |
17 January 2011 | |
Wait -- are you saying that this is an "undocumented" worker? |
17 January 2011 | |
But Natalie, I don't want more issues to deal with! ;)
Employee was an illegal immigrant. Presented employer with this SSN. Turns out this SSN belonged to someone else. This was discovered when NCESC asked the client to verify the benefit claims against the client's account. We saw a name we did not know. It was the real name for that SSN. |
17 January 2011 | |
Gotta love the illegal immigrant program of stealing SSNs. No morals, complete lack of honesty. Just lovely. |
17 January 2011 | |
I would forward a copy of the IRS notice to ICE just in case they decide to someday enforce the laws concerning illegal immigrants which have been on the books for decades. |
17 January 2011 | |
but they're hard workers, just as our immigrant ancestors were. And many are fiercely loyal to their families. Not so with many 'Americans' who divorce 50% of the time. |
17 January 2011 | |
Turns out my ancestors signed the Guest Book on the way in....stood in line and waited their turn (you know, the right way). This generation takes a different approach though. It's a whole lot easier to just hop the fence, demand free medical, educational et al services and send the money back to their coutnry of origin. It's a beautiful thing. |
17 January 2011 | |
Umk395 - just to clarify, client has never received any notices from IRS. This was a result of North Carolina Unemployment. |
17 January 2011 | |
Gotcha -- OK. I would do as you suggest and send the W-2 with all data you have (address, etc.), but don't include the SSN. This problem must be absolutely rampant at the IRS. Can you even imagine how many mismatches they have dealt with in the past 10 years with all of the illegal aliens just making up SSNs or worse yet stealing someone's SSN? Wouldn't want to be in the IRS's shoes trying to figure out how to address that issue. Completely out of control. |
17 January 2011 | |
Kev -- being loyal to yur family doesn't allow me to break the law. I might try that next I get caught speeding...."But officer, can't you give me a break? I'm a great father/husband." LOL |
17 January 2011 | |
UMK, do you have evidence of this "demand' for free education, medical, et. al. services? You sound a little xenophobic to me. |
17 January 2011 | |
I could be xenophobic...if I only know what that meant!
"A person unduly fearful or contemptuous of that which is foreign, especially of strangers or foreign peoples." I actually had to look that one up! Hmmmm...nope, I don't think I have contempt, just looking for people to follow the law. I honestly have not looked at the law, but frmo what I know, you're suppose to sign the guest book if you want to enter America legally. You're not suggesting that we haven't provided free medical services to illegal aliens are you Kev? And if we do provide free medical services (as well as free educational, social, et al services), my guess is that those costs are being passed along to someone....and I would also guess that those costs are bore by Americans. |
17 January 2011 | |
Gotta love a good lively debate on the undocumented worker program! |
17 January 2011 | |
Guess we're getting a little off topic though....sorry about that. Back to business! |
17 January 2011 | |
The law that the feds. really didn't enforce was the I-9s and required documentation to go with them for the file. The immigrants came here because they KNEW they could get a job, it's that simple really. |
Tax Writer (talk|edits) said: | 17 January 2011 |
OK. I would do as you suggest and send the W-2 with all data you have (address, etc.), but don't include the SSN.
This is a violation of disclosure rules. The employer has no "hard evidence" of anything-- just that the SSN was incorrect. It probably was identity theft, but would you risk your license on it? The IRS is not an immigration agency, and this is not our job, or even within the scope of our duties. By the way, I had this problem many years back when the Soc Sec Administration screwed up when I tried to change my name. I got a notice from the IRS and my employer-- but guess what-- I'm an American citizen and always have been. If the employer or the employer's accountant would have "reported" me to the IRS, I would have had the accountant disbarred for privacy violations. Disclosure of taxpayer information is a felony. I'm very conscious about disclosure and privacy. As for the reporting requirement, the instructions for the 1099 forms allow the taxpayer to submit without a TIN, and file on paper. In this case, if the SSN is invalid, then you would have to do the same. I would attach a note to the filing. What else can you do? |
January 17, 2011 | |
I-9s have been around for more than 10 years, so did the employee show a fake SS card with a fake ID card?
I know sometimes we don't want more work, David, especially in an area where we have no experience. Given the new information you provided, it seems to me that the client should at least let the IRS and Social Security Administration know about this so that the real person's wage information can be corrected. |
17 January 2011 | |
UMK, I'm not suggesting that people don't take advantage of our systems, I'm just looking for you to provide proof that these people DEMAND we provide them services. Your words are much stronger (and emotionally charged) than mine, leading to possibly incorrect conclusions and generalizations.
My point about the family loyalty is to show that these people are humans too. They're not animals. They may even be more civilized than many people here legitimately. At least they're willing to work. Can't say that about some Americans. |
Tax Writer (talk|edits) said: | 17 January 2011 |
I-9s have been around for more than 10 years, so did the employee show a fake SS card with a fake ID card?
This is usually how it works, but many times the worker is not illegal, but evading other debts. My husband's company has had more than one instance where the employee was an American citizen, but was using a family member's SSN in order to avoid child support leins. It's actually pretty common. |
18 January 2011 | |
Natalie, I was joking about not wanting more issues. I absolutely want to make sure this is handled correctly.
Yes, employee presented fake SS card and fake ID card when hired and completing the I9. When the client confronted the employee, the employee admitted to client he was illegal and that he had presented fake documents. Employee told client that he had started the proper immigration paperwork many years ago, but stopped since he was getting away with it as is. Our "hard evidence" is the notice from NCESC that basically states their records indicate this SSN belongs to another person...and I guess the guys confession. Nothing from IRS or SSA that I am aware of. My intent was to submit a letter with the W2/W3 that simply stated there is no SSN on this W2 because we became aware the SSN we had was incorrect. The W2 would have the last known address - similar to how we would file any other separated worker. I would not include any other information. I would not call them out as illegal, stealing identity, speeding, running red-light, etc. TaxWriter, to me, that sounds like what you were saying above. Agree? |
Tax Writer (talk|edits) said: | 18 January 2011 |
TaxWriter, to me, that sounds like what you were saying above. Agree?
Agreed. I would report the earnings exactly as you suggest. |
18 January 2011 | |
"Your words are much stronger (and emotionally charged) than mine, leading to possibly incorrect conclusions and generalizations."
Hey -- just my opinion. You called me xenophobic. I called you no names Kev. Play nice in the sandbox. |
18 January 2011 | |
Now that we're starting up a new busy season, and since this is the second day in a row that a discussion has been led astray because of a comment that appears to reflect an underlying political viewpoint, this seems like a good time to reiterate (or iterate, for those new to the site) that comments/asides/posts/entire discussions about political issues or hot-button issues that are likely to create a political discussion (because you just know somebody's going to respond to it, either pro or against, and then one thing leads to another...so it's better to not even start the process) should be limited to the CHAT forum, please. Once a discussion turns to non-tax issues, it'll be moved to the Chat forum, and some OPs are not too thrilled to find that their valid tax question is only being read by the chat-devotees.
Thanks to all for trying to hold back! |
18 January 2011 | |
Actually, Davidcpa has just let me know that he's gotten what he needed from this discussion, and so I'm going to go the safe route and move this over to the Chat Forum now (at the least, so people that happen on to it later aren't surprised to see the direction it took for a while). |
January 18, 2011 | |
Well, I did want to reiterate that I think the prior wage information needs to be corrected. The other person has incorrectly had his or her SSA account credited. I'll add that to his talk page. |
Tax Writer (talk|edits) said: | 18 January 2011 |
I did want to reiterate that I think the prior wage information needs to be corrected. The other person has incorrectly had his or her SSA account credited.
Natalie, I fail to see how the tax professional could "correct" any SSA information without violating ยง7216. The preparer cannot release ANY biographical information to a third party. The reg language says this includes any "information including but not limited to a taxpayer's name, address, or identifying number, which is furnished in any form or manner by a taxpayer for, or in connection with, the preparation of a tax return of such taxpayer" Aren't payroll returns also included as part of the prohibited disclosures? I assume that the employee did not give his permission in writing to the employer or the preparer. How could this be "corrected" without violating disclosure rules? A corrected W-2 would have to include the name of the correct taxpayer, right? And the accountant doesn't have permission to file anything on the taxpayer's behalf. As for the "illegal" employee-- if he did not give permission in writing for the accountant to disclose his information to a third party, then how would the SSA account be corrected without a violation of Section 7216? |
Heritage120 (talk|edits) said: | 21 January 2011 |
Do you think that the employer could have an issue deducting an illegal aliens wages due to it involving an illegal activity? Just this week I had a company wanting to use illegals and issuing 1099s without having socials. I said no I-9, no deductions. Once I explain it like that, they tend to comply. Obviously it was the fake employee who committed the offense but there could be a possibility that it could be disallowed for the employer. Just a thought to marinate on. |
January 21, 2011 | |
Tax Writer, note that I did not say the preparer should correct it. In fact above I specifically noted the client should correct the information. |
21 January 2011 | |
Since the govenment hardly EVER checks the I-9 documentation, there is a whole lot of winking and nodding that goes out out there regarding the QUALITY of such documentation. I'm not willing to make the employee take all the blame, the employer often knows what's going on and cooperates in it. I'm speaking in general and not about David's client.
Don't fool yourself for a second: business wants the illegal worker. The illegals are not coming up here on vacation, they are coming to get a job they know they can get (even though it's tapered down now because of the economic slowdown). The US Chamber of Commerce crowd wants to reduce labor costs, that's all they care about. Whether it's an illegal immigrant or a legal one or one on a temporary Visa makes no difference to them. |
21 January 2011 | |
UMK, you are mistaken. I didn't call you xenophobic. I wrote that "You sound a little xenophobic to me." If you don't know the difference then I can't help you. Sounding like something to someone (a matter of perception) and being something (in actuality) are too different things entirely by matter of degree. I could perceive that you appear to be something but that doesn't mean that you really are, or that I called you that something. "Appearances are often deceiving." But, on the other hand, someone once told me that "perception is reality." The point is moot. |
21 January 2011 | |
"Living life for the Kingdom in the U.S., giving glory to God for all things".
The whole point of the New Testament was to temper the law with mercy and grace. A lot of this stuff against Mexicans is pure racism (against native Americans), let's call it what it really is. Racism, "fear of the unknown", bigotry: essentially the worst characteristics of humanity. Unfortunately, this kind of trash is being preached and encouraged by devils (posing as ministers) in many "conservative" American churches today. It's not the first time devils have taken over the pulpits, it happened in Germany a while back. |
21 January 2011 | |
I edited out what I originally wrote. I think we need to emphasize the brotherly love aspect of religion a little more in America today. Walk a mile in the shoes of some of these people. We also need to understand that it takes two to tango, and some American businesses have encouraged illegal immigration for their own selfish purposes. |
Jlove70123 (talk|edits) said: | 21 January 2011 |
How to Prevent go to
SSA's Social Security Verification System It's the steps to being able to verify Social Security Numbers. With these new PTIN rules I am going to start using it for all my new clients. |
22 January 2011 | |
The Social Security Verification Service is ONLY supposed to be used for W-2 peoplel - NOT 1099 people.
I tried once getting authorization for a client of mine to use that Service for verifying when he got a new employee - and this was about 2 years ago. All I can say is that it was so cumbersome and I had so many problems getting into the program - I finally said forget it - it's not worth all the hassle and trouble the way it was set up. I've learned that - like with anything the government does to "make it easier for you" - they put stumbling blocks in your way to make it more difficult. |
22 January 2011 | |
To walk in someone else's sandals:
Consider that 1.5 million Mexican farmers were driven out of business by cheap corn from USA after NAFTA. Of course, it's the Mexican government's problem. Not ours. But, I wonder, what would any one of us do? Just apply for immigration visa and wait for our turn, while we watch our family starve. |
22 January 2011 | |
Crow, quit editing your posts! It too much work to go back into history to see what you really wrote and think! Enough of this civility! I was sorry to see Olbermann leave MSNBC, now I will have to go back to reading the NYT to learn what the lunatic left is proposing. Krugman even wrote a column the other day where he did not propose high taxes, increased spending or mention the rich. What is this world coming to?
I often wonder what documentation my ancestors came with. There were no drivers licenses, Social Security, etc, I know they came in the backdoor and not through Ellis Island. Doctors checked for " signs of mental disturbances" at Ellis Island so my family would not have made it. There is a streak of insanity in my family, what else would account for the time I spend on this Chat board. |
22 January 2011 | |
and your voting record? LOL
I wonder whether the Native Americans thought that they had ever invited the Pilgrims? This country was founded by illegal immigrants. Now we want a wall? That didn't work in Berlin either. |