Discussion Archives:Do we have to pay taxes at all?

From TaxAlmanac, A Free Online Resource for Tax Professionals
Note: You are using this website at your own risk, subject to our Disclaimer and Website Use and Contribution Terms.

From TaxAlmanac

Jump to: navigation, search

Discussion Forum Index --> General Chat --> Do we have to pay taxes at all?


Dsglouise (talk|edits) said:

5 March 2009
A client of mine asked me a question yesterday: Is it true that there is no law that would tell us to pay tax?

I told him that it doesn’t make any sense to me, but since I do not know the answer to this question , because I never saw this code, I decided to ask, if his question was stupid or smart.

Bushmaster (talk|edits) said:

5 March 2009
His question is stupid.

Irsfixer (talk|edits) said:

5 March 2009
Of course not, we are all part of the conspiracy.

TheTinCook (talk|edits) said:

5 March 2009
Sounds like your client has been listening to tax protesters. The law that requires us to pay income tax is 26 USC §1.

Take a look at the Tax Protester FAQ, just don't let any of the crazy get on you.

Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said:

5 March 2009
You might go here and read about what should be an excellent book on this subject:

http://mauledagain.blogspot.com/

Yt1300inHtown (talk|edits) said:

5 March 2009
Don't you know it's a "voluntary" tax?

Dsglouise (talk|edits) said:

5 March 2009
Is if really a voluntary :o(  ?

Dsglouise (talk|edits) said:

5 March 2009
Hey, guys

I thank you for your reply, but whatever links you gave me are not links to the code that would say that we have to pay taxes.

Do you know a link to the code?

Pent-Up (talk|edits) said:

5 March 2009
Read the "Imposition of the Tax on Income" 1913.

Public Law ***** Imposes on every Individual an requirement to File a Tax Return (no less than annually) and to Pay over to the United States Treasury an amount of tax.

It is not simply states since the IRC has been amended numerous times over the past 95-years.

Be sure of this, if you have a client taking the position that - there is no law simply stating the requirement to pay taxes - be certain to warn them - the IRS treats "Tax Prostesters" harshly - very harshly.

Clearly, every Citizen and Resident Alien and Non-Resident Alien with sources of Income within the United States of America has the strict obligation to maintain records, to time report (file) all tax returns, to estimate and pay over tax, and to timely file all tax returns.

AEM CPA (talk|edits) said:

5 March 2009
http://www.taxalmanac.com/index.php/Internal_Revenue_Code:Sec._1._Tax_imposed

TheTinCook (talk|edits) said:

5 March 2009
Dsglouise, I gave you a cite to the code.

AEM CPA (talk|edits) said:

5 March 2009
But she couldn't click on it, so it doesn't exist.

Dsglouise (talk|edits) said:

5 March 2009
Thank you, Pent_Up

But this is just WikipediA. I placed there record about myself once. This is not a legal source. Though, they have an external link to http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/charters_of_freedom_8.html

I assume that since it’s .gov I can trust this source, but still it’s not very convincing. :o( And, don’t you worry about me, I’m not going to listen to nerdy meanly and nonsense clients.

After all, thanks to this law (or whatever it is) I have a business to run. I was just curious, why people ask these kinds of questions? I just needed a break from preparing income taxes, and intertain myself a little.  :)

AEM CPA (talk|edits) said:

5 March 2009
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=47027

Now that's entertainment.

Dsglouise (talk|edits) said:

5 March 2009
Oh gee!

AEM CPA, I didn’t ask you to give me these links to scare piss out of me. I asked you for a link to a code. Of course it’s entertainment! When a desperate client, a truck driver, bought a house just a year ago, took interest-only loan over the roof (all he could take), and right after this his driver license was revoked, because he plead guilty, because he is Russian, and didn’t understand what that guy told him over the phone. So he just said “yes, guilty”. So he ended up paying for his truck, and a new house with zero income; and he comes up with a question if he really must pay taxes.

I don’t know about you, but I have a lot of fun.

CrowJD (talk|edits) said:

5 March 2009
I wish it was true that the IRS took a hard stance against tax protestors. Unfortunately, they do not, at least according to a book I read. It is reputed that there are some people the IRS has not touched for fear that the law would be tested. As a purely practical matter, it is not that easy to get a conviction for intentional evasion (See Snipes). A lot has to do with your defendant. Snipes was a "mere comedian", what could he be expected to understand (cough).

As mentioned, I read an interesting book I checked out at the library about 5 years ago on this very subject, I don't remember the title, but if I'm at the branch in the future, I'll try to update this post.

Frankly, I don't have time to sit and chew the fat with the protestors. It may be a question with interesting theoretical overtones, but clients never seem willing to pay for the theoretical. Besides, in the final analysis, I can't see any Court willing to abolish itself, since it's tax money that pays to keep the lights on in the Courthouse.

P.S. I should point out that when you see a billionaire like Leona Helmsley (Deceased) go to jail, with her bank of highly paid lawyers, it should give the average TP pause.

Joanmcq (talk|edits) said:

5 March 2009
The IRS takes a hard stance, as does the Tax Court. Snipes was tried in civil court; a jury is more likely to be sympathetic and he did get busted pretty bad for not paying, he was accquitted on the conspiracy charges. The guys who sold the scheme to him got slammed.

Dsglouise (talk|edits) said:

5 March 2009
Thanks CrowJD.

It's always a pleasure to read your post.

CrowJD (talk|edits) said:

5 March 2009
Hmmm, I think there was a criminal case brought against Snipes, as well as a civil case. It should be pointed out that Snipes ended up having to pay all his back taxes and penalties. However, I think the Service lost it's criminal case against Snipes. "Acquit" is not a word used in civil cases.

Wkstaxprep (talk|edits) said:

5 March 2009
ask wesley snipes hollywood actor and richard hatch of survivor if you have to pay taxes. they wear red jump suits on a daily basis now :)

Darryl strawberry may also vouch for the seriosness of paying your taxes, lol.

Yt1300inHtown (talk|edits) said:

5 March 2009
I worked in IRS collections in Austin with non-filiers while in college. We got the occasional protester canned letter response from people. We never changed our approach with them versus any other taxpayer. You didn't file, we came on after you.

Dsglouise (talk|edits) said:

5 March 2009
Yt1300inHtown

I didn’t work in IRS, but this is exactly what I told my client: I never saw this law, and can’t tell you exactly if it exists. But if you don’t pay, you have to deal with IRS, and it’s similar to KGB. So he rested his case immediately. Lol

Greg91020 (talk|edits) said:

5 March 2009
The website www.quatloos.com is partially devoted to the documenting of the activities of individuals who sell phoney tax advice for profit. The scam artists are the source of much or all of the nonsense that "there is no law making me liable for tax" etc. For a very quick overview of the actual laws go to http://www.quatloos.com/hereisthelaw.htm

Dsglouise (talk|edits) said:

5 March 2009
Gred91020!

You didn’t get it! I don’t need an overview! I can write an overview myself. Do you know that I’m a writer? Lol! I’ll write all you want! www.usfinances.net/book

I was asking for a link to an actual code!  :o))

Dsglouise (talk|edits) said:

5 March 2009
Gred91020!

You didn’t get it! I don’t need an overview! I can write an overview myself. Do you know that I’m a writer? Lol! I’ll write all you want! www.usfinances.net/book

I was asking for a link to an actual code!  :o))

Greg91020 (talk|edits) said:

5 March 2009
My belief in your sincerity is at the edge of breaking. There is more than one single item or link that you would need to view, to satisfy yourself that the law is valid. There are also plentiful court decisions. I was giving you a place to start your research, since you appeared to be having difficulty using the internet. Use the overviews already given you, to google the actual law citations, like the Constitution and Title 26. They are plentiful. Hopefully that's not too tough.

You also asked "why do people asked these questions" and I gave you a link to a site that gives plentiful evidence.

Dsglouise (talk|edits) said:

5 March 2009
Thank you, Greg!

I don't have difficulties to research the internet. I'm a computer programmer after all. LOL.

It was very thoughtful of you! Appreciate it. I'm just teasing you. As I said, I'm entertained.

TexCPA (talk|edits) said:

5 March 2009
Dsglouise

this video on youtube kinda sums up the twists and turns regarding the assertions and IRC references you might be looking for

[[1]]


TexCPA 12:49, 5 March 2009 (CST)

Irsfixer (talk|edits) said:

5 March 2009
Wesley Snipes was found not guilty of federal tax-fraud and conspiracy charges, but was convicted on three misdemeanor counts of failing to file a tax return. He was sentenced to three years in prison. This was criminal court - not civil.

Ksnoopytax (talk|edits) said:

5 March 2009
Clearly, protesting taxes has worked out so well for those who have tried.

Chris-R (talk|edits) said:

5 March 2009
The U.S. Government is limited in power by the U.S. Constitution. If a power is not enumerated in the Constitution or if the Supreme Court has not found a power to be in the Constitution (i.e. right to privacy), then the Government does not have such power. In this case, Article 8, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution gives the government the right to tax and spend.

ChrisV2 (talk|edits) said:

5 March 2009
Good to know. I have a file on my desk from someone who hasn't filed a return since 2002. I didn't realize quite how large the font can get on IRS notices, or that they do own a set of red ink cartridges. Maybe I should tell the client that they were right all along, there is no law that says they need to pay these taxes.


Actually, I'm going to be referring him to an attorney. This file is warm when I touch it.

Wkstaxprep (talk|edits) said:

5 March 2009
so, should we pay our taxes or not?

Irsfixer (talk|edits) said:

5 March 2009
Well, I am glad we got that cleared up.

Dsglouise (talk|edits) said:

5 March 2009
Yea!

Wkstaxprep, It’s a very good question! Isn't it? Screw taxes, let's go shopping! I think this is the better solution to support the economy at this particular moment. They’ll waste tax money for another bail out anyway. lol

Wkstaxprep (talk|edits) said:

5 March 2009
tough call go shopping or taxes, i may actually pay my taxes instead after all !!!!

Taocpa (talk|edits) said:

5 March 2009
Chris-R,

A little history lesson and correction:

While you are correct about the US Constitution, your citation is incorrect. Article I Section 8 deals with the issue you refer to as to the legislative branch and it states the following:

Section 8. The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts and excises, to pay the debts and provide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States; but all duties, imposts and excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

However, the 16th Amendment ratified in 1913:

The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several states, and without regard to any census or enumeration.

and the history of that can be found here:

[2]

Now, Dsg, your client can play all the games the tax protesters do, but I suggest they just look at these items and just suck it up.

Tom

Dsglouise (talk|edits) said:

5 March 2009
Tom, You have a very nice picture of your team! Cute!

Taocpa (talk|edits) said:

5 March 2009
Dsglouise,

Thanks.

That band picture is 10 years old. The only people in the band still are me and two others. I am out right now on leave until I get better.

I have to laugh about your client. These clients always crack me up. I just laugh at them and tell them I don't get into that work and leave it at that.

A place I worked for was a haven for fielding calls from these crackpots. They would always get directed to me for some reason. I was just the controller. I just told them to read the US Constitution and point them to this and that just to get them off the phone. Boy, they were fun to deal with, that's all I can say.

Tom

Joanmcq (talk|edits) said:

5 March 2009
sorry I used the term civil when I meant criminal. A little bleary eyed at this point.

CrowJD (talk|edits) said:

6 March 2009
Ha. That's ok Joan, I got it all wrong also. Thanks Irsfixer for setting the record straight on the Snipes affair.

As usual, DsgLouise has managed to capture the situation in a few well chosen words..."But if you don’t pay, you have to deal with IRS, and it’s similar to KGB. So he rested his case immediately."

Personal tools