Discussion Archives:(Chat discussion) Is anyone else frustrated
From TaxAlmanac
Discussion Forum Index --> General Chat --> (Chat discussion) Is anyone else frustrated
17 March 2010 | |
I prepare a young couple's return - approx 30 years old - neither has EVER worked full time - 2 kids. They make approx 14K. With eic and other - nothing paid in - they get back over $7K! Then I prepare a 85 year old womans return small pension (from working her whole life!) and SS taxable income 16K - she has to write a check for $500.
I'm just getting angry at the inequities in this continually crazier tax code. Just ranting - and wondering when the govt is going to stop giving $$ away to people who are irresponsible and/or lazy |
17 March 2010 | |
I get a little upset over the EIC, child credits etc. which are giving away MY tax money with little relief for the older folks struggling to get by also. Its a welfare state kind of thing. We only have input to changes to the tax code with our voting rights for members of Congress. |
17 March 2010 | |
Tax code isn't the problem. There are NO available JOBS paying a living wage for a family unless you are highly skilled or highly educated. That family isn't living high on the EIC tax refund. It probably keeps them in their crime infested apartment complex somewhere rather than being out on the street.
There are only so many crud unskilled service sector jobs to go around. McD's is full of immigrants. Banksters have shut the small business expansion hopes for the economy down. Wall Street, Citi, JP Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo all got bailed out by these same taxpayers and their execs went right on pigging out on insane bonuses. Why shouldn't the actual people get bailout too? Probably education is the way out for these young people. So what are the States doing? Cutting education budgets right and left, increasing classroom size, cutting back on class offerings, firing teachers, firing K thru 3 assistants where the early foundation is built. Whole world's gone nuts and have let the banksters take complete control. |
17 March 2010 | |
Gosix, the EITC has been around longer than the bailout of banks and fatcat corporations.
I agree, welfare ought to be removed from taxes. That would allow at least 1/3 of all citizens to not even have to file a tax return. Then we wouldn't be bothered by people wanting RALs etc. They would get their money from the welfare office and we could do 'real' tax returns. The chains would largely be out of business. |
Anarchrist (talk|edits) said: | 17 March 2010 |
The old lady probably gets twice as much as the young couple. She just gets it every month in her SS check instead of once a year. The inequities are only that others are forced to pay the welfare for both families not that one family may be getting a little more than the other. |
17 March 2010 | |
I know EIC has been around for a while, and there are inequities in the code. Its just that the tax code inequities are so far down my frustration list that it just doesn't compute right now.
You are in NC right, Kevin? You see what they are doing to school budgets? Furlough days. Charlotte talking about firing 10% of their teachers due to budget constraints. Or if not firing them cutting salary by 8%. Most of these people aren't well paid. An 8% paycut on a 38K salary is gonna hurt. And its all around. The returns I'm doing are showing financial destruction on the household balance sheet at critical scale. Small business income is down 20% on average, small business is still laying off employees, personal returns are showing 3 in 10 households with one or the other spouse laid off and collecting unemployment. Maybe you guys only deal with elite clients. But mine are suffering, large. So my frustrations are topped by the economy, the Federal Reserve policies, good paying jobs being outsourced or eliminated, and the banksters shooting everyone in the foot by destroying the velocity flow of money and therefore the economy with it. Tax code inequities are way down the list. |
17 March 2010 | |
Anarchrist - the old lady at least paid into social security for 30+ years - this is just returning her money. This young couple could work - but are very careful not to work too much - to reduce their benefits - here in Mass that includes free health ins - Agree Kathi need to make a lot of changes in Congress |
17 March 2010 | |
<<This young couple could work - but are very careful not to work too much - to reduce their benefits >>
Where McD's or Walmart? And spent 2 hours worth of daily pay for the gas to get there? And 4 hours worth to pay for child care? and then get told to go home after 6 hours becasue full time employment wasn't available? |
17 March 2010 | |
Gosix, yes families are hurting. But most are hurting because of their own overspending and reliance on credit. They wouldn't have gotten foreclosed on if they had a mortgage they could afford on one income. They might have to tighten their belt, but with 6 months expenses in an emergency account they would only start feeling the pain. To a large extent, it is consumerism that has brought the economic downfall upon us. |
17 March 2010 | |
and if that family shopped locally and bought items made in the USA (as well as all of us), those jobs wouldn't have been outsourced in the first place. It is the Walmart mentality that has been the downfall of the middle class. |
17 March 2010 | |
which is nothing but consumerism
buy more and more cheaper and cheaper JUNK |
17 March 2010 | |
I'm not as hard hearted as Kevin, but I agree to a great extent. People take the free credit <it aint really free now is it?> and they spend to the extent their credit allows. People nned to go back to a time where we only buy what we can afford. Place things on lay-a-way or stash money away until they can afford to pay.
I have no problems with offering a helping hand, it's when it becomes a way of life that it frustrates me. When it becomes generational, when parents teach their young the way to work the system. And before you go and say that I don't know what I'm talking about. Growing up, after my parents split, my uneducated mother had to be on welfare for a while, then she worked 2 and 3 jobs scrubbing floors to make sure we had stuff. She made sure we, as children knew that less than an 80 average in school was unacceptable. She made sure that college wasn't a choice, that it was mandatory. None of my 6 siblings receive a government handout. I have also worked 5 years as the controller of a poverty agency. One of the Community Action Agency organizations that do awesome work throughout this nation, so I have a soft spot for those that do need the EIC to survive. I have no issues with the EIC, I do have an issue with the way it's given out. These folks get $9,000 in their hand and it's spent on big screen tv's and all sorts of other goodies that they forego throughout the year and their rent and mortgage still don't get paid. I accept it as a form of welfare and am good with it, but they should take any amounts due to the child credit and EIC if both are there and they should be paid to the taxpayer evenly over a 6 to 9 month period. At least each month their rent is paid. |
17 March 2010 | |
Fred, we were on food stamps and welfare (AFDC) when I was a child also.
I agree that these people need the EITC, I just don't think it should be tied to a tax return. I've long advocated a debit card with 1/12 of the EITC deposited each month. Or, Advance EITC (which I understand the IRS wants to do away with because of the cost of doling out this welfare). So the hard-heartedness comes legitimately. |
17 March 2010 | |
The hard heartedness wasn't meant in a mean way. I also get tough as well. I don't like people making excuses that their life is miserable. I am a believer of making your own luck and doing what you have to do to make it work. My cafe fiasco wiped me out financially and put me in a hole that I am only now recovering from. But I keep plugging away and I expect others to as well.
I totally agree with the 1/12th idea on a debit card. |
Tax Writer (talk|edits) said: | 17 March 2010 |
I agree with Anarchrist-- the way Social Security and Medicare works, the old lady had exhaused "the money she put in" within 3-5 years of drawing Social Security. The numbers just don't work-- you can't expect to work for 20-30 years and then get SS for another 20-30, but that is exactly what's happening. She starting drawing at 62-65 and now she's 85, which means she's been getting a check for 20 years. She's gone way past "the money she put in". Not to mention what happens when the state has to step in and take care of someone who needs 24 hour care. But I think that there should be a safety net, but the current one has a lot of holes. They better raise the age for Social Security soon or there will not be any for me or my kids.
And I think we would all be better off without EIC-- the IRS estimates that 1/3 of the EIC returns are fraudulent. I'm saying this even though I qualified for EIC in my twenties. I would rather see that money put to good use helping the mentally ill and the disabled, or into cheaper education for our kids. We can't compete globally if we put education last. Tax Writer |
17 March 2010 | |
Gosix: "There are NO available JOBS paying a living wage for a family unless you are highly skilled or highly educated." There's a lot of truth to that.
And even if you are highly educated, the large corporations have fixed the Visa law so that your degree is worth much less (H1-B Visa). The H1-B Visa (totally fraudulant visa in practice) has put a huge dent in Americans in computer science programs: why work so hard, pay all this money for school, and have a non-American be allowed in to steal your job or lower your wage? It is sheer insanity what we do to our own people. Even if you have a fulltime "job" in America today, there is no guarantee that you won't be on food stamps or Medicaid. |
18 March 2010 | |
Kevin's right in the fact that we consumed our way into this mess. Those kids with the EIC could have been from any of the last three generations they are nothing new. The real change from years gone by are those who are the working class. Where are they working? Not at a great array of factory jobs that were available twenty-thirty years ago.
The IEC for those with no kids are pretty popular. There are more than a few young people who are over twenty-five and have income that puts them in the EIC range. |
Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said: | 18 March 2010 |
Taxation of Social Security began in 1982; they have never adjusted the threshholds for inflation. The top limit went to 85% in 1993. In 1982, it was part of the price to cut the top rate then to 50%, along with taxing all unemployment and sick pay (you are really getting old if you can remember doing the sick pay computation).
The EITC came earlier. Its fathers were, of all people, Richard Nixon and Daniel Moynihan. Somewhere they are rolling in their graves. Please, I am not making political points, only relaying history. |
18 March 2010 | |
Kevin - "and if that family shopped locally and bought items made in the USA (as well as all of us), those jobs wouldn't have been outsourced in the first place. It is the Walmart mentality that has been the downfall of the middle class."
Exactly. Everybody wants everything cheaper, cheaper, cheaper. Then they wonder why their neighbor lost their job...and those mean corporations closed the plant. Look, you cannot buy a pair of shoes from Wal-Mart for $9 and expect you or your neighbor to make them and still make $45-$50k/year. And also don't be appalled when you learn about the Kathi Lee Gifford sweatshops. |
19 March 2010 | |
"maybe we should call it the H1-N1 Visa?" So true, or that too.
Nothing gets my lather up like the H1B Visa. Most of the Fortune 500 have their fingers in it, and so do almost all large universities, irony of ironies. Great way to get a cheap employee who will work for comparative peanuts. Law firms have departments just to help companies cheat on this Visa. I am not sure any of them are filed that are not fraudulant, and the government knows it. Last I heard there were 600,000 slots under this program, and companies were pushing for more, and that's 600,000 AMERICAN workers who will have their wages suppressed, including wages of whole industries (particularly computer science/programming). There is no shortage of American workers in these industries, we don't need foreign help. This is why Congress needs those Mexicans coming over the boarder; because average Joe can get steamed about the Mexicans, without realizing that his lunch is really being eaten by the H1-B. |
19 March 2010 | |
Also, David, you missed one step.
Meglo-mart buys the shirt for .50 from country X, sells it for $10.00. Is it cheap, cheap, cheap? No! It should be $5.00, still with a very healthy margin. Note that the person totally cut out of the deal is the American worker. He traded a manufacturing job with good pay for the chance to work at Meglo-mart, and the chance to buy a $10.00 shirt, when the corporation could still get rich selling it at $5.00. Free trade is a wonderful thing, if you are that top 1% that owns the majority of shares in Meglo-mart... We don't sign free trade agreements to help the middle class. |
19 March 2010 | |
Presumably a legal worker/American sells you that shirt and drove the truck that took it from Port to the store. |
19 March 2010 | |
He traded a good manufacturing job to sell me a shirt at Meglo-mart? Any idea what Meglo-mart pays? Real question is: where is the money going? It's not scattered over the fruited plain, I can tell you that much. It's going to that top 1-10%. That's why the middle class is sinking.
Also, trucking don't pay like it used to, it's not that kind of job anymore. They push the "idependent" trucker now. Sort of like the independent contractor... no benefits, that kind of thing. A lot of truckers today are killing themselves trying to make a buck, and killing other drivers too. When the middle class goes, America goes. That's why the rich keep building the fences higher in the gated communities (it won't work though). P.S. That's why we also have a Patriot Act. Remember, the Patriot Act started out with a sunset clause. It didn't sunset. We don't have the Patriot Act to lock up terrorists anymore, that was beside the point, and readily taken care of. We have a Patriot Act to lock up Patriots one day. Just watch. |
19 March 2010 | |
ahh, but we can count them as employed so the unemployment rate stays at a "low" 10%, even though the real numbers fluctuate around 20%! Come on Crow, get on the government subsidy train. If health care passes we are all going to become low cost government enforcers. Heck with circ. 230, we already are. We are slowly sinking into a government stupor.... its SOMA tablets, congressional style. |
19 March 2010 | |
Most Americans are so busy today trying to eek out a living, they don't see the big picture. But, look at the numbers. Better yet, try to find the numbers. Try to find the most current distribution of wealth figures for America....we don't keep them. Last I saw were from 2004 put together by a University.
As far as health care, that's easy. We can save money right now with Single Payor, National Health Insurance like every other sensible major democracy has. Every study shows that. We don't have it because there is so much money to be made by doctors, and primarily by middlemen like the health insurers (with an extra barrel of cash paid over to the drug companies). I do agree we have a terrible problem with socialism though. Socialism for the rich. Like bailing out private banks and investment houses on Wall Street to the tune of 2T. |
19 March 2010 | |
"Presumably a legal worker.."
Just had an unemployment audit today with a client. Auditor kept saying client has been filing claims and has paid in for a guy he has never heard of. After a 5-10 minute conversation, the light bulb went off...let me see the SSN. Oh crap...that is Joe's SSN. Joe is from Mexico, but gave my client all of the appropriate documents...13 years ago! This is the first time any agency has even raised an eyebrow. Client calls Joe. Joe fesses up. My client was crushed that he has been lied to for 13 years. H1B - I used to work in a very specialized industry. They would find THE GUY from UK/Europe that they wanted. Then would begin the process of applying for H1B. I always had to laugh at the wording in the want ad. You might as well cut & paste this guy's resume into the ad. Then add their physical characteristics...must be 5'10", 163 pounds, with red hair, left handed and a speech impediment. The best was the time that the applicant must have this specific list of degrees and certifications. And a red-blooded American from the midwest applied and had all of those degress and certificates. He had better GPA's, test scores, letters of reco from some of the most highly regarded people in this field. It was fun to watch them scramble since the guy from UK had already moved here and was working full-time. |
20 March 2010 | |
Here's my beef about the govt - Americans are certainly tightening their belts and paying down debt, but I read that the federal government is incurring over $5 of debt for every $1 citizens are paying off.
CrowJD & Davidcpa - your comments are eye openers. I was thinking that free trade was a way for us to be compassionate and share our good fortune with the teeming masses in the third world, but I can see there are flaws in that reasoning. What if we went back to manufacturing, say, good quality toasters here in the U.S.? Then when they broke, we could get them repaired by a local skilled craftsman who we pay a decent amount to, rather than simply throwing it in the landfill and buying another cheap toaster made by workers abroad being paid slave wages. Or get the good quality clothing repaired by the skilled local seamstress rather than buying a new one. We might not have as many gadgets or clothes, but we might have a better economy. Of course the problem of enforcing the trade and immigration restrictions which this would require would remain, plus the issue of trying to aid the unfortunate in third world countries. |
20 March 2010 | |
Smokey - yeah I wish we were back to having quality products that lasted a long time and made sense to repair. This winter my DVD player stopped working...it just would not turn on. I live in a very small town so walked it down the street to the local TV repairman. He would not even touch it. He told me it would cost $60-$70 to figure out what is wrong with it, get the part & install it. I "went into town" and got the newer version of the DVD player for $50 at Best Buy. So I gave him the old one and asked him to fix it so we can donate to Goodwill. I hate to put more crap in landfills. |
21 March 2010 | |
I do not know Kwcpa's clients specific situation, so I cannot comment whether they are using the system or our society has failed them. I will say this though, in my opinion many in our country believe that it is their right or their privelage for the government to provide. I could not disagree more, there are obligations and responsibilities of each of us. If we live up to those responsibilites and meet those obligations, then at some point we will be rewarded. For those willing to work, strive and figure it out, this country still holds the best opportunity for a successful and rewarding existence. |
Kparkertax (talk|edits) said: | 22 March 2010 |
I do believe that there are a lot of family's that need the EITC to pay the gap in their living expenses. I do sympathize with the percieved inequities in the system year after year though. I try to express to my upset clients that even though some people qualify for EITC, they do enjoy far less income overall.
Our county is boasting a nearly 20% unemployment rate here in Northern CA. Most clients that qualify for EITC are desperately in need of it to survive. There are no jobs popping up in the paper besides for Census takers. I agree that the downfall to the economy was consumerism itself. The financial system allowed those who could not possibly pay for credit/mortgages to rack up the kind of debts that could never be recovered. I also blame the large influx of student loan debt from the 1990s and early 2000s hitting the 30 somethings that are supposed to be working and spending. Due to huge student loan debt, there is less and less discretionary income left for spending to stimulate the economy. When student loan payments eat up 400-500 a month on top of other living expenses or home mortgages and family expenses, car payment, ect... there is little to "play" with. |