Discussion:American Opportunity Credit - How About A good Discussion!
From TaxAlmanac
Discussion Forum Index --> Tax Questions --> American Opportunity Credit - How About A good Discussion!
Contents |
18 January 2010 | |
Knowledgeable folks seem all over the map in regards to the AOC education credit as to what expenses may qualify and or under what circumstances they may qualify. In what circumstances will you allow a client to use any of the expenses for books, supplies, and course materials (equipment).
What criteria will you have or use? What information will you expect the client to have or furnish? Example - client comes in with a 1098T that shows 6,000 in qualified tuition and fees. The client states that they also spent 500 dollars on books, had to have a laptop, a calculator, and or other misc supplies and materials. None of which would, I suspect, be included in the 1098T as the school would have no idea what a student spent on such things. Would you say that the above would absolutely have to be required in order to enroll. If you did not have a computer or calculator or certain books you could not enroll or attend a class. |
18 January 2010 | |
that's what they make libraries for - most universities have at least one textbook for each class in the library.
There ARE students who can't afford books and computers. Oh, the libraries have computers also. So I sincerely doubt your statement, Ddoshan. It is not correct. |
Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said: | 18 January 2010 |
"The Hope credit is available for 'qualified tuition and related expenses,' which include tuition and fees (exclusing non-academic fees) required to be paid to an eligible educational institution as a condition of enrollment or attendance....." This is the Conference report. |
18 January 2010 | |
http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0,,id=211309,00.html
See Questions 4 & 5 |
18 January 2010 | |
I'm asking for receipts for the books, supplies & tuition (the 1098T doesn't always match what they paid for tuition). As far as the computer goes, question 5 in the above link has that question, but I would think a computer would only be a condition of enrollment if you are taking web classes, I don't know, but it seems like the student should be able to provide something from the school stating that it's a condition of enrollment. |
18 January 2010 | |
The "Hope Credit" per se is still available to midwestern disaster students, but everyone else gets the AOC. |
18 January 2010 | |
I have read various material on the AOC and as usual find it just a little confusing. Kevin I don't follow. Don't think I was making a statement but was just curious as to how other interpreted the AOC and how they might handle it.
Books Supplies and materials it still does mention as a condition of enrollment or attendance. Do you think that means that somewhere in order to enroll it is stated that you must have a certain book, calculator, or whatever otherwise you can't enroll. Somehow I suspect it is not quite that clear cut. If it is that clear cut, then I would think that the client better have some sort of document or something from the school stating that they cannot enroll or attend unless they have particular books, supplies or materials. Just trying to see how others see this and how they plan on dealing with it. |
18 January 2010 | |
That is a nice link Solomon. Still seems rather vague to me. |
18 January 2010 | |
I do not read it as requiring books, supplies, and materials as part of the condition of enrollment or attendance. That was the requirement for deductibility under the old Hope credit. The way I read it, the AOC allows books, supplies, and course materials to be deductible as long as they are needed for the course of study, whether or not they are required to be purchased from the same educational institution as a condition of enrollment or attendance. Pub 17, page 239. |
18 January 2010 | |
As far as documentation is concerned, I'd advise my clients to keep printouts of the textbook and/or equipment lists for each class and attach the receipts. |
Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said: | 18 January 2010 |
Solomon's attachment goes along with the next paragraph in the Conference Report, which says something to the effect that the expenses must be an "out-of-pocket expense." Thus it is not eligible if paid from an employer plan, or other tax free savings plans.
I agree with NoVa's read on it. Seems to me that's what I heard at a recent seminar. btw, at a Working Together seminar we were shown the 886-H for the FTHBC. |
18 January 2010 | |
I don't disagree with anything said. Just that things are not clear in my opinion. That's why folks seem all over the map on this and wondering how others were interpreting and going to handle this.
Form 8863 instructions state- short version... books, supplies, and equipment needed for a course of study ...... as a condition of enrollment or attendance. Just how do you interpret the as a condition of enrollment or attendance? You can't enroll or take a certain class or classes unless you buy or have a computer, or certain book, or whatever. Need something in writing from the school stating such or what. It may be clear to most but not to me. Note that in various places they use the term needed rather than required. Are these terms interchangeable. |
18 January 2010 | |
According to our IRS liaison, if it's needed for a class, it's deductible. That includes a computer and internet access. And no, you don't have to keep a computer log to document and/or allocate time and internet usage. |
18 January 2010 | |
if it's needed for a class, it's deductible. That includes a computer and internet access
That's the most liberal interpretation I've heard or seen yet for the AOC. |
19 January 2010 | |
The syllabus for the class lists the required texts. This usually includes the latest edition of the text. While it's true the campus library may have a copy of the text, it may not be the latest edition.
Things are much more standardized today, especially in the large colleges. You go to the campus bookstore or used bookstore, and Class X generally always uses the same texts no matter who is teaching it. You can buy the book even before you see the syllabus. I don't know anything about this AOC, but I think it's accepted today that a computer is just as necessary as paper used to be to attend college. I find it hard to believe that that means you are entitled to a new one every year though, or every semester. |
Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said: | 19 January 2010 |
In many parts of the world, with most tuition amounts you've blown through the credit.
Just as important, and with no questions asked, computers and internet access can be used as qualified spending from a 529 Plan. |
19 January 2010 | |
The new 529 plan rules crossed my mind also and wondered if what was advised was in connection with that and not the AOC.
Crow .. A lot of things may be necessary but the rules previously were reasonably clear (and still are the same for the hope credit and or lifetime learning credit I believe) that a computer purchase was not an eligible qualified expense in connection with the education credit. Same for books and supplies unless under very specific circumstances. Required for enrollment, have to have been purchased thru the school etc. Basically included as part of tuition. As far as I know the rules for the AOC may very well still be the same just that it now includes materials, / equipment etc. and they no longer are required to be purchased from or thru the school. |
February 10, 2010 | |
NoVATaxes, please clarify. Why are saying that the "Hope Credit" per se is still available to midwestern disaster students, but everyone else gets the AOC. This is getting more and more confusing and ProSeries Education Worksheet lists five YES or NO questions concerning whether or not the student is qualified/ eligible for the five possible education scenarios (Hope Cr, American Op Cr, Lifetime Cr, Tuition Deduction, and Disaster Area. If an "at least half-time student" is academically still in his sophomore year of college but in his 3rd or 4th calender year of going to school then he's eligible for the AOC, but not the the Hope Credit. But if he's a sophomore in his his 2nd calender year of attending, then he's qualified for either the Hope or the AOC. Am I correct?Why does the gov't have to complicate these matters? |
February 11, 2010 | |
If the total tuition is more than $4,000 for students in their first four years of college, adding books, supplies, and equipment won't increase the credit. The maximum $2,500 credit is available only for the first $4,000 of tuition, books, supplies, and equipment.
If the student is in their 5th year of college, use the Lifetime Learning Credit. They don't qualify for the AO/Hope credit -- and they can't add books, supplies, and equipment to the tuition when figuring the Lifetime Learning credit. If income exceeds the Lifetime Learning credit limits, take the tuition & fees deduction on the 1040. Books, supplies, and equipment can't be added to the tuition & fees deduction on the 1040. Basically, the Hope Credit has been renamed to the American Opportunity Credit and extended for two years (that is, the first four years of college now qualifies for the AO/Hope credit). Books, supplies, and equipment can only be included if the student qualifies for the American Opportunity credit (that is, they are in their first four years of college). |
Pink Pearl (talk|edits) said: | 11 February 2010 |
From IRS.gov "The American opportunity tax credit can be claimed for expenses for the first four years of post-secondary education". In the past I have used the terms Freshman, Sophmore, Junior and Senior rather than year one, two, three or four to determine the usage of which credit or deduction to use. This allowed for the occasional student who could not attend on a full time basis. I have client this year that has been in undergraduate school for five years due to changing his major in his Junior year but is still rated a Senior. Would like to think that he is eligible for AOC in 2009 but....not sure about the first four years verbage. It appears that he may not qualify for the AOC and the refundable credit as he has no tax liability in 2009 so the other two options are not going to do him any good. Is he out of luck this year? |
Pink Pearl (talk|edits) said: | 11 February 2010 |
Prior year instructions for Hope Credit are "The credit can only be claimed for two tax years for any one student. However, the student may be considered a first or second year student in more than two years. The institution determines whether or not the student has completed the first or second year of education. It appears that my client would qualify for his fifth year AOC credit. |
Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said: | 11 February 2010 |
From Publication 970:
"To claim the American opportunity credit, the student for whom you pay qualified education expenses must be an eligible student. This is a student who meets all of the following requirements.
What a puzzling way to word it! Or at least to me. So a client whose income [married-joint] for the past many years has been between 125K-160K had to use the deduction. He has a fifth year student, 23, with a small net amount spent but a full time student. Seems he meets the definition of Example 2. |
11 February 2010 | |
The institution determines whether or not the student has completed the first, second or 4th year (AOC) of education.
This goes to the same old question. Person graduates from college in 1996 with a bachelors degree in English. In 2009 he goes back to some business school or some culinary institute or whatever for some sort of degree in cooking or financial planning. I doubt if the school gives him credit for having completed 4 years of college. I don't think this person would be eligible for the AOC credit or in prior years for the Hope credit. Some years ago I had a client that had got a masters degree several years prior to these education credits. She went back to some 2 year type of school to get a degree or certificate to be a Master Chef or whatever. Paid a small fortune for this schooling. I'm sure the school could have cared less how much college she had had prior to enrolling in their program. I don't think the Hope credit applied in her case or cases such as these. Although when I think back, I believe I did give it to her right or wrong. |
Pink Pearl (talk|edits) said: | 11 February 2010 |
I seem to recall that the primary motive behind the credits way back when were to encourage taxpayers to obtain higher education which would in turn (theoretically) make taxpayers end up paying more taxes as they earned more income. If a Masters degree in abacus design didn't pan out in the 80's then someone who started over again training to be a (whatever) should be eligible 20 years later when that person is a freshman, sophmore, junior or senior again. This issue is about post Hope/Lifetime/Deduction rules I think. At this moment I am inclined to give my 5th years senior the refundable credit but I'm gonna hold off for a day or so.... |
Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said: | 11 February 2010 |
I think that was the original incentive for the Lifetime Learning credit: the original committee reports state "To assist low- and middle-income families and students in paying for the costs of post secondary education...." (Hope Credit) They then say "In contrast to the HOPE credit, a taxpayer may claim the Lifetime Learning credit for an unlimited number of taxable years."
This is TRA 1997. I do wonder, Dan, what happens when student has attended five or six schools in those five years! Putting the onus on the college to make the determination seems a little unfair, though I understand they measure by credits and credit hours and not anything qualitative. |
Wkstaxprep (talk|edits) said: | 11 February 2010 |
would it be unreasonable to assume if the 1098-T graduate box is NOT checked, the taxpayer qualifies for the AOC? or do we really need to dig further and confirm they are first 4 years?
also, i see a few graduate students who are doing their own taxes and claiming the AOC. I told one person "you can't claim the AOC you are a graduate student" person replied "but turbotax is letting me do it even though i answered their interview questions" |
11 February 2010 | |
Assuming the graduate box is not checked, but the at least half time student box IS checked, then I agree.
That is why people who don't know what they are doing, should not count on the accuracy of Turbo Tax. |
Wkstaxprep (talk|edits) said: | 11 February 2010 |
I wonder if all these AOC credit claims that are not elgible will result in IRS notices?
I doubt it and it's a shame becuase claiming the AOC does result in substantially more money especialy with the refundable portion. The IRS may lose out quite a bit on these. |
February 11, 2010 | |
My understanding is a person can only claim the Hope/AO credit on tax returns for four years and no more, regardless if it took more than a year to complete their freshman, sophomore, junior, or senior years. |
Pink Pearl (talk|edits) said: | 11 February 2010 |
Deback...I have quite a few high school seniors who take one or two college level courses before they officially start college. If they were only allowed four years what a disaster it would be to take a credit for a couple hundred dollars in tuition. I can't find anything that goes against what I found above where a tax year can be different than a calender year. |
Cites on "four years" (4 year limitation)
11 February 2010 | |
There are two separate limitations. The “A” limitation says that the Hope/AOC credit may only be claimed for 4 taxable years. The “C” limitation says the credit is only good for the first 4 academic years. |
Pink Pearl (talk|edits) said: | 11 February 2010 |
Prior year (2008) instructions for Hope Credit are "The credit can only be claimed for two tax years for any one student. However, the student may be considered a first or second year student in more than two years. I'm still a bit confused...I thought the AOC was an expansion of the Hope credit. Are you saying that taxable years = calender years and that academic years = grade level i.e. freshman, sophmore etc? Just trying to grab this one R2 so where do I find the "A" limitation and "C" limitation info..thanks. |
11 February 2010 | |
Yes, that is what I am saying. A senior studying engineering would most likely be demoted to freshman status if he decided to enroll in nursing school.
The A & C limitations are found in IRC 25A(b)(2) for the Hope Credit and in IRC 25A(i)(2) for the AOC credit. |
12 February 2010 | |
A few thoughts.
I'm allowing most college expenses that seem reasonable. This includes books, computer, internet access, pencils, notebooks etc. It doesn't appear to me there is any limit on the number of times the credit could be taken, if a person fails lots of classes and is still considered a senior in his 10th year thats fine by me. There seems to be no condition of actually passing the courses. Theoretically(sp?) I could enroll in the cheapest online school available for the minimum required to be considered half time for 1 semester. I don't know but let's say that costs $1,000. I then go buy a laptop that also costs $1,000(obviously required for online school). I fail the class but I get a $2,000 credit on my tax return. Hence the federal government just bought me a $1,000 laptop for $2,000. Can someone please tell me this wont work? |
12 February 2010 | |
There is a limit on the number of times the credit can be claimed. See IRC 25A(b)(2) for the Hope Credit and in IRC 25A(i)(2) for the AOC credit. |
Computers as Qual Exp?
12 February 2010 | |
I keep reading that some preparers are allowing computers. I have read and re-read Publication 790 and it is still not clear to me that a computer is a required equipment to be able to take a course. Pub 790 starts describing education expenses as tuition, fees, and certain related expenses "required for enrollment". When IRS mentions about those related expense, the only newa is that books,or other expenses need not to be purchased from school. Unless there is something else under ARRA, not being listed on Pub. 790, I find it difficult to justify computers as a required expense.
I do work for an Agency that administers one of the federal education assistance programs for displaced workers. Under its rules we are always deciding on which expeses we can approve. Computers are an expense that the program does not consider as a requirement for enrollment. Has anyone seen something on ARRA that I am missing? |
Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said: | 12 February 2010 |
Computers are permitted as allowable if money is taken from a 529, and I think maybe a few take that fact to the next step. |
Pink Pearl (talk|edits) said: | 12 February 2010 |
Sometimes...when I cannot get the logic of the tax law rules...I start spinning around in my chair. I have many clients that are single parents attending night and weekend school to obtain a 4 year degree and can only afford/manage to go on a part/half time basis. The issues of losing out on valuable tax and refundable credits because the wording/interpretation of tax year versus academic year boggles my mind. All eligible taxpayers should benefit from these credits...not just the ones who can afford to go on a full time basis. I imagine that none of the congessional creators of these rules have children going on a part time basis to college. OK..that's out of my system so it's back to work. |
Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said: | 12 February 2010 |
Isn't that what the Lifetime Learning Credit is for? Until recently sometimes that worked better than the HOPE. I realize that it is not refundable but...... |
Pink Pearl (talk|edits) said: | 12 February 2010 |
Lots of single folks with dependents don't have a tax liability so a credit is useless......before the AOC it was something one lived with but now because they have used up the tax years on part time they lose the refundable... |
12 February 2010 | |
On page 239 of pub 17 under the heading "qualified education expenses" it says(page 242 of online pdf): http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p17.pdf
American oppportunity credit: Qualified edducation expenses include amounts spent on books, supplies, and equipment needed for a course of study, whether or not the materials are purchased from the educational institution as a condition of enrollment or attendence. Hope and lifetime learning credits: Qualified education expenses inclued only amounts for books, supplies, and equipment required to be paid to the instition as a condition of enrollment or attendence. books, supplies and equipment needed for a course of study. A laptop is needed for most courses, definetly any that are online. |
Midwestern Disaster Area 2009
12 February 2010 | |
FSC - <<NoVATaxes, please clarify. Why are saying that the "Hope Credit" per se is still available to midwestern disaster students, but everyone else gets the AOC.>>
What I mean is the Hope Credit has been replaced by the American Opportunity Credit, except for students meeting the special rules for Midwestern disaster areas. For those students, they can claim the higher amount Hope Credit instead. One caveat is, if there are multiple students on the return, and if any qualifies for the Midwestern disaster Hope Credit and claims it, the AOC cannot be claimed by any other student on the same return. |
13 February 2010 | |
books, supplies and equipment needed for a course of study. A laptop is needed for most courses, definetly any that are online.
A lot of things may be needed, useful, wanted or whatever but are they a condition of enrollment or a requirement to attend. Even an online course, I suspect that whoever you take the course from does not make it a condition of enrollment that you have a computer. I do agree that the IRS or the powers to be could make all this education credit stuff just a little bit less confusing. I've been agonizing over various aspects of it since inception of. |
2010 February 13 | |
Just a note here. When I was in college back in 1987, I was REQUIRED by the college to take a 15 hour non-credit course to learn to use a computer and specific software (word and spreadsheet) in order to facilitate completion of courses. The college had mandated that every course would require a written report - even my statistic course. Since I was computer literate, I fought the requirement and won. BUT, the point here is that computers are necessary equipment for a college education.
Today, most professors post assignments and communicate via the internet. If all students had to rely on college library computers there would not be enough to go around. A computer (be it laptop or desktop) is an essential piece of equipment for a college education. Since the cost of most computers loaded with necessary software plus course text books and other out of pocket expenses will exceed the annual credit, the vast majority of students and parents are being aided (as intended) - they are not making a profit on these credits. |
Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said: | 13 February 2010 |
And this is another area where we poor professionals must put on our Sherlock Holmes hat. Dad bought Jason a MAC laptop for Christmas when Jason was a senior in high school. No tax deduction, of course, but now that Jason has headed off to college, how do I know the secod IMAC Dad bought that next Chritmas was used by Jason, especially when I notice that Sara, his daughter, is now a senior in high school. |
13 February 2010 | |
A lot of things may be needed, useful, wanted or whatever but are they a condition of enrollment or a requirement to attend. Even an online course, I suspect that whoever you take the course from does not make it a condition of enrollment that you have a computer.
The pub 17 specifically says is does not need to be a condition of enrollment for the AOC. I could see how it could be interpreted differently, but I'll point out that there is no comma in this paragraph from pub 17. American oppportunity credit: Qualified edducation expenses include amounts spent on books, supplies, and equipment needed for a course of study, whether or not the materials are purchased from the educational institution as a condition of enrollment or attendence. I also agree that this definition is very vague and leaves the door wide open to abuses. |
13 February 2010 | |
So after digging further and reading the pub 970 education expenses it says
For purposes of the American opportunity credit, qualified education expenses are tuition and certain related expenses required for enrollment or attendance at an eligible educational institution. http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p970.pdf
From American Opportunity Credit Q &A. http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0,,id=211309,00.html Q5. Does an expenditure for a computer qualify for the American opprtunity tax credit? A. Whether an expenditure for a computer qualifies for the credit depends on the facts. An expenditure for a computer would qualify for the credit if the computer is needed as a condition of enrollment or attendance at the educational institution. |
13 February 2010 | |
Where are our code warriors when we need them? I will try and find my copy of the new code a look it up next week. Agree with JMC above that the pubs are contradictory. Ddoshan, as always, your dogged pursuit of the truth in this mess is appreciated and shared. |
13 February 2010 | |
According to Internal Revenue Code § 25A, the term 'qualified tuition and related expenses' means tuition, fees, and required course materials required for the enrollment or attendance of the student. Internal Revenue Code § 25(a)(i)(3). |
15 February 2010 | |
That helps but still leaves some grey areas in my mind.
Give me a yes or a no on these: 1. Dress code, must wear slacks and dress shoes to attend.(I went to such a college and was sent home for wearing tennis shoes once)? 2. Must get to school, can I use transportation costs? mileage? 3. Reports and projects must be submitted via internet, Take computer and iternet fees? 4. notebooks, paper, pencils, calculator, etc? |
16 February 2010 | |
Computers are specifically allowed for a 529. The verbiage "required for enrollment or attendance" is vague, but I would be inclined to believe that having a computer is expected, encouraged and even advertised by most institutions with certain specifications recommended. Even our school district has books online and assignments are submitted online for various classes. More and more publications can be obtained in electronic format. While there may be ways around not having a computer - public sources or sharing- to not have a computer & internet access to do research and complete assignments would put any student at a serious disadvantage.
Traveling to school & clothing is on you. Paper, pencils, while necessary, is pushing it. |
17 February 2010 | |
The way I interpret the 529 "computer allowance" is this: 529 distributions can be tax free if used to pay for qualified education expenses. It is in this context that a computer purchase is allowed as a qualifiying expense under ARRA. Allowing a computer as an eligible expense to reduce the taxable portion, if any, of the 529 distribution is different to say that the computer is a qualifying expense for education credits. |
WD Kebschull (talk|edits) said: | 17 February 2010 |
I haven't seen any discussion regarding the inclusion of itemized deduction recoveries (state income tax refunds) in the determination of American Opportunity Credit. It sure looks to me that the language in section 111(a) of the Internal Revenue Code prohibits the inclusion of itemized deduction recoveries in AGI or modified AGI in the determination of allowable deductions, exemptions, exclusion, eligibilities, and credits. See the comments related to Hillsboro National Bank and Home Mutual Insurance Company cases in the Anotated Code.
Compare the consequence on gross income of including a state income tax refund on Line 10 of Form 1040 combined with the inclusion of the refund entered on Line 10 on the phase-out of the Social Security benenfit exclusion per IRS instructions with the language in section 111(a) of the IRC. A $1000 state income tax refund can add up to $1850 to gross income due to the modified AGI based phase-out of the Social Security benefit exclusion. The increase in taxable income attributable to a $1000 state income tax refund can exceed $1850 and we have not even gotten to the impact of the state income tax refund on credits. Of course the reduction in Taxablle Income attributable to an itemized deduction cannot exceed the amount of the deduction and itemized deductions cannnot increase the allowable tax credits. |
17 February 2010 | |
Wow, never thought about any of that before. Good stuff. |
17 February 2010 | |
Can the 529plan be used for a dual enrollment student, or would that be a taxable distribution because they aren't in college full time? |
WD Kebschull (talk|edits) said: | 18 February 2010 |
Jmcdon00,
You will find that Minnesota is one of the states that include state income tax refunds in the calculation of taxable Social Security benefits! Who says there is no more bi-partisanship? Go figure! One of the problems of doing taxes on a computer is that preparers don't give some forms and instructions the scrutiny that they deserve. Of course there are big advantages to using a computer. The software outfits apparently are too timid to tell IRS they have things screwed-up. The upside to computers is that you can sit at your desk and have access to a world of information. You just have to figure out what is valid and what is bogus. The students at the high school that my son graduated from 20 years ago have been required to have computers for several years now. When I was in college back in the previous millenium there were no hand held electronic calculators! |
13 March 2010 | |
Here's a situation I'm not quite sure what to do regarding the American Opportunity or other credits. Child gets 1098T for last semester of senior year, $14k of tuition. Gets a job for the second 1/2 of the year, makes about $25k. No longer a dependent on the parents return, parents make too much to take any of the college credits anyway. This was her last semester of a 4 year degree, none of the college credits were ever used for the child because the parents made too much. Tuition was obviously paid for by the parents. Use the American Opportunity credit on the kids return? |
13 March 2010 | |
Absolutely. They could even qualifty for the refundable portion with that earned income, even if they are under 24.
I've had a couple of students this year that graduated in 2009 from undergrad and therefore, had a last semester of tuition. Then they started grad school in the fall. I'm supposing I can take either the AOC for the undergrad semester, or the LLC for the grad semester on the parent's return if the child is under 24. If the child is 24, and had earned income over $3,650 the parents can't claim them, so it goes on their return. If they can't take the max on either, I see no way to take one for the undergrad and the other for grad school. Too bad. |
13 January 2011 | |
What are your thoughts on utilizing the internet cost for the AOC only for the months that the student was enrolled in classes? I have a student that specifically had internet connection installed at their home for the purpose of fulfilling the requirements for a hybrid class (a class that is half on campus and half online). |
24 January 2012 | |
Got the bug again and a couple of us did some more research and study on this subject. Has driven me crazy over the years.
Anyway, based on the assumption (which is what the code seems to say) that in order for a computer purchase to be eligible for the AOC credit it must be a requirement for enrollment or class attendance ... We did some research on the local college site about enrollment and class requirements. So far (perusing the site) I have only found 2 classes where the course outline indicated that the purchase of a computer is required for the class. One was some photographic imaging class where a laptop and various imaging programs were required to take the course. Another was some drafting and design class where a requirement for the class was a laptop etc. Strangly under their various computer careers and classes offered not once was there listed a requirement of the student for a computer or any other such device for class enrollment. My bottom line now has changed somewhat. If the client can show me that enrollment and or the course requires the purchase of a computer such as the above two courses did in their college outline then fine. Otherwise no. |
8 March 2012 | |
There are two separate limitations. The “A” limitation says that the Hope/AOC credit may only be claimed for 4 taxable years. The “C” limitation says the credit is only good for the first 4 academic years.
So the just to be clear here...if the hope was claimed for two years and the the AOC was claimed for two years, then the AOC is OUT for the fifth year. Yes? (I'm somewhat confused as I for some reason cannot find the code section that discusses the AOC...just the Hope.) |
8 March 2012 | |
Nevermind, I sorted myself out. I was looking at an old version of the code I guess or I just need to eat lunch.
See Sec 25(A)(i) http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/25A |