Discussion:Adding a shareholder

From TaxAlmanac, A Free Online Resource for Tax Professionals
Note: You are using this website at your own risk, subject to our Disclaimer and Website Use and Contribution Terms.

From TaxAlmanac

Jump to: navigation, search

Discussion Forum Index --> Advanced Tax Questions --> Adding a shareholder


Discussion Forum Index --> Tax Questions --> Adding a shareholder

Pacpa (talk|edits) said:

6 November 2007
I have a client who would like to add his son to an S corp. The S corp holds commercial real estate. If the son does not make a capital contribution for his interest should the interest be considered a gift. What would be the best way to transfer the interest in the S corp?

TheTinCook (talk|edits) said:

7 November 2007
Gift up to the exclusion amount.

Is the son working for the S-Corp?

Pacpa (talk|edits) said:

7 November 2007
Yes,The son will work for the corp

JR1 (talk|edits) said:

November 7, 2007
And why OH WHY! is there real estate inside the corp?

TheTinCook (talk|edits) said:

7 November 2007
Image:Elephantfast1small.JPG

Kevinh5 (talk|edits) said:

7 November 2007
that is indeed a fast elephant!

JR1 (talk|edits) said:

November 7, 2007
Thank you Tin. Keep that handy.

TheTinCook (talk|edits) said:

7 November 2007
Glad you guys liked it. I can't believe I misspelled estate...still worth a chuckle though.

Back to the OP. If the son is working for the S-Corp, you might want to have some of the stock given to him as payment for services. Especially if the son has no other earned income.

DouglasHolbrook (talk|edits) said:

18 November 2007
You can use non-voting stock to transfer to your sone and get a discounted valuation on the stock.

DerekCPA (talk|edits) said:

19 November 2007
If you have voting and nonvoting stock, is that not two classes of stock which would terminate the S election?

Jctmstx (talk|edits) said:

19 November 2007
Only one class of stock is allowed.

DouglasHolbrook (talk|edits) said:

19 November 2007
Non voting stock is NOT a second class of stock for these purposes. Reg. 1.1361-1(l)(1)

Ksnoopytax (talk|edits) said:

20 November 2007
LoL I love the elephant. You know...I bring up to my boss often times when we discuss client issues that having real estate in a corporation is a bad idea because if you distribute the building to the shareholders, the corporation will pay tax on the gain under Section 311(b). My boss often rebuttles with the fact that the client doesn't plan on ever selling the building so why does it matter if the property is in a corporation or not? Besides the gain on distribution, are there any other disadvantages to holding real property in a corp?

DerekCPA (talk|edits) said:

21 November 2007
I would have to say never say never. What if the TP outgrows the building and has to sell it to build a new one , etc.

San Diego (talk|edits) said:

21 November 2007
What's the harm if the property is actually sold and not distributed?

To join in on this discussion, you must first log in.
Personal tools