Discussion:A New Sin here on T/A
From TaxAlmanac
Discussion Forum Index --> General Chat --> A New Sin here on T/A
Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said: | 30 September 2010 |
Has anyone noticed that if you give an answer using lengthy analysis, you are accused by some of 'rambling?' Let that be a lesson. Reduce research to sound bites! |
Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said: | 30 September 2010 |
If you use y and n, you are hit with the sin of being frivolous, or being a joker. |
30 September 2010 | |
I think it's a shame. Some of us come here to learn, and therefore really value the discussions where people get into depth about the tax implications of a minor change in the facts and circumstances of a given situation. I feel sorry for people who are so closed to learning new things about the profession that they want sound bite responses to facts and circumstances questions.
Not to mention how risky it is to provide a brief response to someone when you don't have that much info about their ability to apply it correctly, and they've only given half the story in their OP.... OTOH, when a question has been asked a zillion times before and/or actually does have a black and white answer, I quite enjoy seeing the y/n responses. Or a single link or code reference. Always get a chuckle out of those. |
September 30, 2010 | |
"...sound bites" Perhaps we should respond with 'unsound bites' for certain individuals, and let them decipher the accuracy or inaccuracy. Sorta like a Tax Almanac Truth or Dare? |
Flybynight (talk|edits) said: | 30 September 2010 |
You romanticists should all be ashamed of yourselves, with your long rambling answers to "simple" questions involving a reverse non-safe harbor short-year 1031 exchange of possibly like-kind real property that may or may not be used in business for a real estate lease that is somewhere around 30 years, but possibly less.
I can never get a straight answer here! You're all worse than the lawyers. (I do agree with all of the posts above, excepting my own of course!) |
30 September 2010 | |
Lengthy analyses will soon be a thing of the past now that the US Senate has told government agencies to start using "Plain language" in forms and publications. Taxpayers will be able to fill in IRS forms just the way the IRS likes them. There will be no need for us. Heck, I'll have to get a proper job.
A beneficial side-effect of this edict is that the budget deficit will disappear by 2012. My sources tell me that a deficit is expected to return in around March 2013, once members of the Ruling Class work out that the US Treasury has something to treasure. This, of course, assumes that we, and the planet we inhabit, will still be here by March 2013. |
September 30, 2010 | |
LOL - Flyby. You've obviously been following the bouncing ball. |
30 September 2010 | |
DT is this what your are talking about?
TexCPA 11:20, 30 September 2010 (CDT) |
Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said: | 30 September 2010 |
n |
Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said: | 30 September 2010 |
My mind is slipping away. I don't remember answering Tex!!!!!! Could the reason for the LOL be that Kevin has discovered he can be anyone??????
Now here is the muskrat ramble "The muse slid into the floppy drive and was gone. I was hungry for lunch; talking to her is so exhausting. I also wondered for the first time why Seeger used ‘barricade’. It did not sound like the correct word for trench warfare. My reverie was interrupted by the dog at the window, barking at the mail woman’s car out by the road. I grabbed the leash and off we went for a walk. We went into the field next to ours. I let Farfel off her leash. She headed for the rock outcropping and began to circle it, sniffing enthusiastically. As I neared it I heard a voice cackling:
Farfel barked at her but she shouted the dog down and prophesied that Farfel would be lesser than me, but greater than me, not so happy but much happier. The youngest then spoke, pointing at Farfel, “Thou shalt get kings, though thou be none.” A strong gust of wind, straight from Hudson Bay, blew the apparitions away. We walked home, picking up the mail on the way. Most of it was junk mail for my late wife. I tried to take a nap. The dog jumped in bed next to me, but I could not sleep. As I lay there restless, the dog murmured, “Still it cried ‘Sleep no more’ to all the house: ‘Glamis hath murder’d sleep, and therefore Cawdor shall sleep no more, Macbeth shall sleep no more.” She looked so smug and satisfied. I wondered how she was going to produce future kings. She had been fixed as a puppy. One Old English Sheepdog/Irish Setter was enough for the world. I got out of bed and went to my keyboard. I looked up at Lixie, sitting on her sailboat. She smiled and shook her head. “Dad, are you ever going to write anything original?”
|
30 September 2010 | |
I enjoyed that David.
Keith, it was like when I went to our public library a few years ago. The library had an excellent professional set of CCH Tax books (I think it was CCH). I mean these were not handbooks, these were top quality materials. They were housed in the reference section. I noticed they were out of date and I asked the librarian when the new ones would come in. Oh, she says, we just send people to irs.gov now. She acted like she was letting me in on a secret. [It was a county library, but still, give me a break]. |
Flybynight (talk|edits) said: | 30 September 2010 |
Thanks, Belle. I also found the "slur" that was used in a couple threads to be an interesting choice.
I do question the wisdom of constantly updating a library with expensive reference books given the level of access that we have to the written word today. While my love of books was nurtured by the library at an early age, I'm just not sure how necessary it is today for a library to be modern and have the newest resources. I do think we should have well run libraries, as that helps in developing citizenship. A recent NYT article (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/27/business/27libraries.html) talked about the trend of privatizing library systems, which seems rife with problems. Corporations aren't going to stand up against groups that are going to censor books. I consider myself a conservative, but some things, such as police departments, are better run by the government. |
30 September 2010 | |
It's a very complicated question. The libraries in this country are throwing away books by the thousands on all sorts of topics to make way for computer terminals.
However, if you look for a book (say on a hobby or craft) written before the early 90's, you will find an entirely different book than you'll find today. The old books actually taught you how to do something, and they are being thrown away. The editorial style has changed completely today into a sort of breezy style with a bunch of pictures. Short on content. You take the free sites on the internet, same thing. You better know something about the subject before you go to them because there is so much rubbish and misinformation on the internet. People don't think a society can actually lose knowledge. They think there has to be a fire like the library in Alexandria of old. I'm not so sure. But, I do realize that the temper of the times is against me. The community is calling for computers in libraries and they will get them. However, most of the time when I'm in the library today, the kids on the computers seem to be doing everything but research. (Smile). The saddest thing is that the job of a trained reference librarian today is to play timer and dole out terminals to the public. Privitizing libraries? What worries me is the corporations choosing the books to begin with. A library run by Citibank and AIG might be sparse on information about Citibank and AIG (or their cronies). |
30 September 2010 | |
just call the volunteer firefighters for a Farenheit 451 reinactment |
Flybynight (talk|edits) said: | 30 September 2010 |
Libraries today, especially in the current economy are frequently job search hubs where the librarians proof resumes, give interview tips, etc... and additional computer terminals seem pretty vital. I agree that it's a shame what many reference librarians do today, as many (if not most) hold masters degrees in library sciences and are very judicious with their limited funds and try to stock a well balanced library. Unfortunately, like photography and journalism, it appears that being a librarian is a career that has been largely phased out by technology. Despite my high opinion of public libraries and the fact that I read frequently, I haven't been to a public library in over a decade and I'm sure many are the same way.
Seems the only people who go now are those without internet access. |
30 September 2010 | |
I go at least once a month! But in part that is due to me cutting back on my book purchases. |
September 30, 2010 | |
"I'm just not sure how necessary it is today for a library to be modern and have the newest resources."
"Seems the only people who go now are those without internet access. " Scary. I was talking with a college professor recently who said that kids today just don't know how to analyze what they're reading. They've been brought up on the "sound bite" method of communicating and have little use for anything longer than a few sentences. The even scarier part was that the professor indicated this is just a change we're going through, that stories will still carry on as they did many, many years ago and reading will go by the wayside. As for our public libraries, my sons look forward to going to the library every week, and it's not to play on computers. We're definitely in a transition here, but I hope our libraries remain. (Remember when people said movie theaters would disappear after VHS came out?) |
30 September 2010 | |
I agree Natalie, this is the age of the sound bite, and the brief, incomplete magazine article.
Computers are fine to look things up IF you already know something about the subject, but to me the book is still the best way to learn a new subject. I still think the book or the book form is the greatest technology of all time. You can open a book from the 1500's (or earlier) find the printed, unbound pages (in whatever form) and read them. Whereas today, there is no guarantee the hardware (or software) will be around to play the storage medium. We are putting our history at risk. People will not realize until it's too late that you must update all your stored data with each major development in technology OR you must keep the old technology (and keep it in working condition). Most of the old electronics goes on the trash heap, or it get's dusty and won't work. A book keeps fine on a shelf, as long as it's not too damp. |
Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said: | 30 September 2010 |
We can use ID for 'it depends' and HMDYWITB for 'how much do you want it to be.' |
October 1, 2010 | |
For the longest time, I thought "LOL" was "lots of luck." Now you're throwing in all of these other acronyms. We're going to need a whole 'nuther discussion forum just for them! |
1 October 2010 | |
yb? is that yeah babe? or yes but?
Our library also serves as an after school homework center. Its across the street from the middle school. My kids went there everyday after school. They are in high school now but if I am running late picking them up - they walk to the library to do homework. |
CathysTaxes (talk|edits) said: | 1 October 2010 |
My husband spends so much time in our local library and the one a few blocks away from where he works, I'm afraid they are going to start charging him rent! He's discovered spy novels. He can't get enough of them, plus he also likes to get the recorded versions and read and listen at the same time! |
Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said: | 1 October 2010 |
RA = rambling again, whereas RS would be Riley said.
Now for something really old: our town library closed. Someone stole the book. |