Discussion:4 Fail Far Right "Sanctity" Pledge

From TaxAlmanac, A Free Online Resource for Tax Professionals
Note: You are using this website at your own risk, subject to our Disclaimer and Website Use and Contribution Terms.

From TaxAlmanac

Jump to: navigation, search

Discussion Forum Index --> General Chat --> 4 Fail Far Right "Sanctity" Pledge


CrowJD (talk|edits) said:

13 July 2011
http://blogs.abcnews.com/thenote/2011/07/gop-candidates-reject-controversial-marriage-vow-romney-pawlenty-huntsman-gingrich-say-no.html

Pledge written by the "Family Leader" group.

I wonder what the Family Leader group thinks about Jerry Seinfeld?

Marriage went from "on the air to on the rocks". Why? Not gays (this time), but guess who?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g2x8DtDiWFg

PollyAdler (talk|edits) said:

14 July 2011
Here's a quote from Maximum Family Leader Van der Platts:

"With Congresswoman Bachmann and former U.S. Sen. Santorum, they read it and right away they said, "You know what, we see nothing in that pledge that we won't adhere to." So I think that kind of showed their executive leadership style." Salon, July 12, 2011


It certainly does.

Kevinh5 (talk|edits) said:

14 July 2011
The biggest threat to the family today is NOT same-sex marriage. It is, and has been, for 50 or 60 years, DIVORCE. Newt can't sign such a pledge because his own marriages have been failures.

Taocpa (talk|edits) said:

2011-07-14
Bob Vander Plaats is a nobody. Why give him the time of day?

He had an unsuccessful run for Governor of Iowa. That's his claim to fame.

Much like those famewhores who got divorced over their "being on tv", I could care less.

Tom

Pegatha (talk|edits) said:

14 July 2011
Kevin - no freaking kidding! I can't understand why the far-right doesn't get that.

CrowJD (talk|edits) said:

14 July 2011
The so-called threat to the family came when the average woman started making more money and became more self-sufficient.

If you look back prior to the 1960s there were not many divorces, but you'll notice a high divorce rate among Hollywood stars. Why? Because the rich actresses didn't have to stay in a bad marriage, and they could afford to live without a man.

Once women in America could pay thier own bills, they did not feel trapped into bad marriages by financial necessity and they began to ask for divorce.

I had/has zero to do with gays. The gay "threat" is a total fabrication by the lunatic Right.

It comes out of the lunatic Right "Little Book of Big Lies".

Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said:

14 July 2011
Good point, Tom! It shows how times have changed; 30-40 years ago any left-wing nut could stand up and get media attention with some off-the-wall rant. Today they are largely ignored or marginalized, but the media picked up on Plaats and give him his more than his 15 minutes.

Then again, we ignore people at our peril....in South Germany in 1920-22 there was this funny looking guy going around ranting and appealing to certain people....whatever happened to him.

CrowJD (talk|edits) said:

14 July 2011
The increased divorce rate in America since the 1960s is almost all attributable to the increased ability of women to earn their own living.

Women don't have to stay in a bad marriages like they used to.

Taocpa (talk|edits) said:

2011-07-14
The Hitler analogy is interesting, but in today's world, people would see Hitler for who he really was.

A deceased, well-known conservative I worked for was against the war in Iraq. No one paid much attention to him and his comments, yet he turned out to be correct.

The press and a bunch of people fawned over Obama in 2008 and now many regret it.

This is why I don't pay attention to many of these pundits.

BTW Crow, I have to disagree about your analysis. It's the people in the marriage that present the issues, not money. I am not threatened by the fact my wife makes more money than me. We have had many tough times, but through it all, we've endured.

Divorce is an easy way out when it gets "too hot in the kitchen". People, at least from what I observed, want things to be easy. The late Scott Peck in his book, "The Road Less Traveled" had it exactly right in his first sentence: "Life is difficult.".

Tom

Taocpa (talk|edits) said:

2011-07-14
The Hitler analogy is interesting, but in today's world, people would see Hitler for who he really was.

A deceased, well-known conservative I worked for was against the war in Iraq. No one paid much attention to him and his comments, yet he turned out to be correct.

The press and a bunch of people fawned over Obama in 2008 and now many regret it.

This is why I don't pay attention to many of these pundits.

BTW Crow, I have to disagree about your analysis. It's the people in the marriage that present the issues, not money. I am not threatened by the fact my wife makes more money than me. We have had many tough times, but through it all, we've endured.

Divorce is an easy way out when it gets "too hot in the kitchen". People, at least from what I observed, want things to be easy. The late Scott Peck in his book, "The Road Less Traveled" had it exactly right in his first sentence: "Life is difficult.".

Tom

CrowJD (talk|edits) said:

14 July 2011
"Divorce is an easy way out when it gets "too hot in the kitchen".

Tom, in the past the women couldn't leave if it was too hot in the kitchen. Even if her husband was beating her out of frustration. Now, many women can afford to leave.

My analysis is not all mine. This is common knowledge. The Russell Sage Foundation has written a lot about it in some of the 10 year studies.

I can tell you one thing, in all my years of doing divorces, I've never had the parties tell me their reason for divorce was that gays were threateneing the "sanctity" of marriage.

What Bull. (I'm not saying that Tom makes that claim about gays).

Taocpa (talk|edits) said:

2011-07-14
Crow,

I don't know about it being common knowledge. I live this everyday and frankly I don't care.

The gay marriage comment is a ruse. Your point that social conservatives are against gay marriage has nothing to do with your individual clients.

Social conservatives are opposed to gay marriage for various reasons. But I recently heard it said that gay couples should suffer just like heterosexual couples when it comes to marriage. (I forgot the comedian who said it, but it is funny).

Tom

CrowJD (talk|edits) said:

14 July 2011
I've always said the gays don't know what they're getting themselves into! Marriage ain't easy. <G> Neither is divorce.

The country moves past this stuff. We muddle through these things.

I know that American business is past the issue and they are moving forward happy to employ gays. They want gay customers. The big law firms are actively recruiting gays now because it's good for business and this includes gay attorneys. I suppose other professional firms are doing the same.

Gay money spends like any other money.

What's fascinating to me is that many of the churches in the large inner cities are ONLY in business because of gay membership. Trust me this has changed the thinking of some large denomination leadership. Money means something to them as well.

Kevinh5 (talk|edits) said:

14 July 2011
I wonder if the world ended when Canada allowed same-sex marriages nationwide?

Kevinh5 (talk|edits) said:

14 July 2011
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/06/09/national/main4167209.shtml

CrowJD (talk|edits) said:

14 July 2011
I know the intown churches in Atlanta (north of I-20) would not survive without gay membership. Period.

That pretty much includes ALL denominations (even the Southern Baptists). However, the Southern Baptists pretty much moved their churchs out of Atlanta. lol.

The intown preachers and priests have gotten to know gay people and they realize they are like everyone else. We all have the same problems and challanges at the end of the day.

Kevinh5 (talk|edits) said:

14 July 2011
and at the beginning of the day too.

To join in on this discussion, you must first log in.
Personal tools