Discussion:S corp Shareholder SEP-IRA

From TaxAlmanac, A Free Online Resource for Tax Professionals
Note: You are using this website at your own risk, subject to our Disclaimer and Website Use and Contribution Terms.

From TaxAlmanac

Jump to: navigation, search

Discussion Forum Index --> Consumer Questions --> S corp Shareholder SEP-IRA

Rabaty (talk|edits) said:

30 January 2006
My client 100% S-Corp shareholder has received an IRS examination letter regarding the SEP-IRA deduction on 1040.

I talked to the IRS agent, he says, the question is focused on the S Corp earnings/distributions qualifying for the SEP-IRA!!! My client in addition to the S Corp distributions, has also received a W-2 from the S-Corp which shows a significant salary justifying the SEP-IRA contributions in my opinion. Has anyone come across this lately?

Riley2 (talk|edits) said:

30 January 2006
The amounts shown on the K-1 cannot be used to justify the SEP contribution. Only the earnings on Form W-2 may be used to compute "compensation".

ConservativeDC (talk|edits) said:

30 January 2006
An easy way to fix this is simply to amend the 1040s from the year in question, remove the SEP deduction, and take out the SEP money to pay any extra taxes that may be owed.

Alternatively, the K-1s can be amended to change distributions to salary, FICA taxes can be paid, and the SEP contributions can be retained.

MAPBUSINESS (talk|edits) said:

6 March 2006
Another question based on this issue. If S-Corp funds the SEP-IRA for his 100% shareholder/employee based on his Form W2:

S-Corp takes the deduction in Line 17 ? and therefore passes through K1 to shareholder and no deduction on 1040?

JR1 (talk|edits) said:

6 March 2006
The technical problem is that you've taken the SEP in the wrong place. It should go on the 1120S. The 1040 SEP line should be reserved for Sch. C taxpayers. . .that may be what triggered it. Yes, it all comes out the same way, tho' you're paying more state corp. taxes than necessary....

DKcpa (talk|edits) said:

7 November 2006
Rabaty. As Riley2 has stated the calculation of what can be contributed to a SEP IRA is based on W-2 wages. There is a maximum of 25% of W-2 wages that can be contributed (with a 44k limit in 2006). K-1 distributions have no impact on the calculation.

Going forward your client could have an Individual 401k instead of a SEP IRA and may be able to make a greater contribution. Below is an article that I wrote and posted to TaxAlmanac previously that explains this further. SEP IRA versus Solo 401k / Individual 401k


SEP IRA versus Solo 401k / Individual 401k

Introduction:

Are you still recommending a SEP IRA as a retirement plan to your self employed clients? I'm guilty of that too until I learned about how some of my clients could benefit from the Individual 401k (sometimes called a Solo 401k) as an alternative to a SEP IRA. A SEP IRA is a good choice for some self employed clients, but in other situations an Individual 401k provides a larger contribution / tax deduction versus a SEP IRA

About the Topic:

Individual 401k / Solo 401k plans are available to sole props, LLC and S and C corps. The advantage is in how the contributions are calculated. Also, a client that has an Individual 401k can have a loan, something they can not have in a SEP IRA. For example, I have had a client that left an employer and had a 401k, rolled over their 401k into an Individual 401k and then borrowed $50,000 to finance the startup of his business. There are no income or credit qualifications of getting the loan and interest is paid back into their own 401k.

Contributions SEP IRA versus Individual 401k / Solo 401k

In the example below the client is age 55 will have $100,000 net income in 2006 as a sole prop.

SEP IRA - max contribution would be $18,587

Individual 401k - max contribution would be $20,000 + $18,587 = $38,587.

Before I knew of the benefits of the Individual 401k I would have recommended a SEP IRA and would have left a $20,000 tax deduction on the table.

Not every client can make a contribution greater than the $18,587 permitted in a SEP IRA in this example, but for those clients that can an Individual 401k is clearly more advantageous. Also, a very interesting point is the benefits can be doubled for a husband and wife both working for the business and each with 100k net income would be able to contribute a total of $77,174 to an Individual 401k.

Summary:

An Individual 401k may provide your clients with a greater tax deduction and retirement contribution when compared to a SEP IRA. Also, an Individual 401k allows a loan that can provide a financial cushion or can help finance the startup of the business. I have had clients setup retirement account at this firm and have become knowledgeable about these retirement plans by reading the information on http://www.individual401k.com

Jdugancpa (talk|edits) said:

7 November 2006
As JR has pointed out, the SEP is an employer contribution and should have been deducted on the 1120S. Whether you can fix it by amending the corporate and personal returns or not may be determined on whether the SEP deposit was paid by a corporate check or a personal check.

WesR (talk|edits) said:

7 November 2006
Hi all nice typing DK my eyes glazed over but nothing on point for this question. JR is right one cannot have an employee of S corp set up his own sep ira account PERIOD (or any other account DK). He must be covered by a plan of the corp (maybe now the individual 401K if no employees) which must meet discrimination rules by covering all other employees. I bet he is trying to avoid covering employees the cheapskate. :) bye

JR1 (talk|edits) said:

November 7, 2006
C'mon Wes, that calls for an oink...!

WesR (talk|edits) said:

7 November 2006
JR oinks are bad so you were ok, DK didnt apply things right but he doesnt deserve an oink for abusing the rules, so I am not with you. One has to "earn" the oink. bye

Jdugancpa (talk|edits) said:

8 November 2006
"Oink" as in "Pigs get fat but hogs get slaughtered?" I agree, no oink needed/earned. The guy JR is arguing with about reasonable salary on the longest thread in the forum - that guy gets an oink.

Stockma (talk|edits) said:

14 November 2006
On this issue, my client is a sole shareholder of his S corp. With 40K of W-2 wages, can he make a 10K SEP-IRA contribution (25% of wages)? Or is the calculation more complicated than that? I get confused because of all the references in Pub 560 regarding self employment income.

Apart from the wages, the S corp also has 6K of income distributed to him, but I think I can't use the $6K towards the SEP-IRA contribution, based on DKcpa above,

Is there a better retirement plan structure for an S corp sole shareholder?

Many thanks

Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said:

14 November 2006
10K is correct. How much does he need to live? He could get a one person 401K and put up to 15K of his wages in that plus make the profit sharing contribution.

Stockma (talk|edits) said:

14 November 2006
Wow, thanks for quick response. For FICA wage reporting purposes, are reportable wages 40K or 50K in this case?

I don't know about the 401K. Can it be combined with the sep ira?

Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said:

14 November 2006
40K. I would go to http://www.individual401k.com/ a site provided by DK, I believe, in an earlier post, for a simple explanation.

DKcpa (talk|edits) said:

14 November 2006
JR1. I wanted to explain my long post and clear up the "oink" post in question ;) and then to address Stockma's question. I do appreciate the sentiments of those backing me up to defend my oink status ;)

My post didn't focus on the forms necessary to correct the problem, but instead wanted to provide a solution going forward. For example, this is what was stated in the original post by Rabaty

"talked to the IRS agent, he says, the question is focused on the S Corp earnings/distributions qualifying for the SEP-IRA!!! My client in addition to the S Corp distributions, has also received a W-2 from the S-Corp which shows a significant salary justifying the SEP-IRA contributions in my opinion."

Translation: I take an artificially low W-2 and a big K-1 so I don't have to pay as much FICA.

Problem: With a SEP, low W-2 multiplied by 25% = a small SEP contribution and Rabaty would probably like to base the contribution on the K-1.

Why do I assume this? This statement "My client in addition to the S Corp distributions, has also received a W-2 from the S-Corp which shows a significant salary justifying the SEP-IRA contributions in my opinion.."

Opinion? It's not an opinion issue. Take W-2 and multiply by 25%. Riley2 pointed that out that the calcs are based on W-2 and has nothing to do with K-1

Solution: If Rabaty gives his client the heads up on an Individual 401k vs. the SEP even with a low W-2 you can make a much larger contribution.

In this example, Client age 55 one person S corp with low W-2 30k and big 70k K-1.

2006 SEP contribution $7,500

2006 Individual 401k contribution: 20k salary deferral and $7500 PS = $27,500

A Sole Prop can have an individual 401k even though there is no salary. The salary deferral is just based on net income and the profit sharing is based on the full net but the PS contribution works out to be 20% (because you have to make a 1/2 FICA deduction)

Stockma. This now leads into your question...

On this issue, my client is a sole shareholder of his S corp. With 40K of W-2 wages, can he make a 10K SEP-IRA contribution (25% of wages)? Or is the calculation more complicated than that?

You got it 10k. The SEP calcs are W-2 X 25%.

Apart from the wages, the S corp also has 6K of income distributed to him, but I think I can't use the $6K towards the SEP-IRA contribution, based on DKcpa above,

Thank you. You got it. I'm glad my typing isn't all in vain :)

Is there a better retirement plan structure for an S corp sole shareholder?

Yes, if your client can make a greater contribution than 10k allowed in a SEP than you might recommend an individual 401k.

Assume your client is age 45 with 40k W-2 and 6k K-1. SEP contribution (40k x .25) = 10k

Individual 401k contribution (15k salary deferral) + PS (40k x .25 = 10k or in this case the full 6k since that is all that is in K-1) = $21,000 total.

Stockma in your example you could take 30k W-2 with 16k K-1 and then could make a contribution of 15k + a PS of $7500 = $22,500. You would have a lower W-2/taxable income and larger total contribution since you are leaving more $$ for the PS contribution.

Want to provide value to your self employed clients, justify the fees you charge for being a knowledgeable tax professional, become the hero by providing your client with a nugget by showing them a way to get an additional 15k or 20k tax deduction compared to their SEP? Then take 15 mins to learn about the Individual 401k...I did :) http://www.individual401k.com

Hawks03 (talk|edits) said:

5 January 2007
If the taxpayer is the 100% owner of the S Corp, can they still make non-deductible contributions as the "employee" on top of the employer contribution of 25% of W-2'd wages? For example, the taxpayer pays himself a bonus of $80,000. He contributes $20,000 (25%) to his SEP IRA. Can he also make a $4,000 contribution as the "employee"?

JR1 (talk|edits) said:

January 5, 2007
He IS an employee, so he's subject to the same rules as any other taxpayer, and could make the 4k nonded. IRA contribution...

JLM (talk|edits) said:

11 January 2007
Interesting discussion and wanted to join on something that I just figured out. Please see if you see any problems with this tax saving plan for SEP IRA.

A 100% shareholder in S corporation appears to be able to be able to shield his SEP contribution (based on 25% of W-2 wages) from self employment taxes as well as from income taxes because it comes through a reduced K-1 income, and is not reported on his W-2 and is not subject to self employment tax because it is a 1120S K-1.

In contrast, a Schedule C SOLE PROPRIETOR would have to pay self employment taxes on the amount of the SEP contribution amount because it would not be deductible on the schedule C and therefore would be subject to self employment tax, but not subject to income tax because it could be deducted on page 1 of his 1040.

JR1 (talk|edits) said:

January 11, 2007
Hmmm. Never actually thot of it that way before...another plus in the S corp column.

TaxNewbie (talk|edits) said:

20 January 2007
Soooo, does this mean that if a S Corp contributes to a SEP IRA for its sole employee, the contribution is not subject to FICA taxes?

Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said:

20 January 2007
Exactly: Say company has 100K profit BEFORE sharehold salary. Multiply by 25%, subtract answer and get 75K. Take 75K as salary, paying FICA on 75K. Then fund SEP for 18750, 25% of 75K. Balance of profit will fund Employer FICA. JR will have you cut the 75K down, to a lower figure to save FICA on S Corp profit, say 60K salary, 15K SEP, 4,590 FICA with the balance of profit exempt from FICA. Two roads to Rome, both equally good. JR's give after tax money to spend, D&Ts puts more in deferred places


Tell us who you are, fill in your profile. We like to get to know our friends.

TaxNewbie (talk|edits) said:

20 January 2007
Thanks for your help.

Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said:

20 January 2007
And thanks for filling in your profile!

Bmcgin (talk|edits) said:

21 January 2007
I am trying to figure out how my wife can contribute pretax money into an IRA for 2006. This is how we are setup.

1. I have an S Corp and W2 myself.

2. I contribute to my SEP and report it on the 1120s.

3. My wife is a sole proprietor, she is paid by the S corp (no W2, no 1099).

4. She reports her gross receipts on the 1040 schedule C.

5. Her net is $12,343.

6. The AGI on the 1040 is $113k.

7. TaxCut says she can make a SEP contribution of $2294.


I was under the impression that pretty much anyone can contribute pretax dollars of $4000 into a traditional IRA and that a SEP can be contributed to like a traditional IRA. (Vanguard told me this last year.)

What is the best way for her to contribute (pretax) into any retirement plan? I have already filed the 941/940 this year. I am starting to think I should have given her a w2.

Deback (talk|edits) said:

January 21, 2007
(7) is correct. She can contribute to a SEP: 25% of X (where X is her net income less 1/2 of the SE tax less the SEP contribution) -- or -- 20% of X (where X is her net income less 1/2 of the SE tax).


When MFJ, and if you are covered by an employer retirement plan (your SEP), your AGI must be less than $85,000 to make a partially deductible IRA contribution or under $75,000 to make the maximum deductible IRA contribution (which is $4,500 each or $5,000 if age 50 or older). The deduction is phased out from $75k to $85k for joint returns.

Bmcgin (talk|edits) said:

21 January 2007
Has the "phase out" always been in place? If I taxes are going to be paid on this contribution, wouldn’t a roth be a better vehicle?

Bmcgin (talk|edits) said:

21 January 2007
Ah, after some research I can see the phase out has always around for a long time.

Jdugancpa (talk|edits) said:

21 January 2007
An individual 401(k) would allow her to contribute $11,471 on earnings of $12,343. I think, however, the plan has to be set up before 12/31/06 for that tax year. I'm certain that is the case for a regular 401(k) but less certain about an individual 401(k). Anyone know the answer?

Bmcgin (talk|edits) said:

21 January 2007
I think this is also a possibilty: Contribute to the SEP as an employee and to a Traditional IRA in the same year.

If this is true, then what Vanguard said is also true. Direct the traditional IRA contribution to the SEP, becuase it is the same as opening a Traditional IRA making the contribution, then tranfering the Traditional to the SEP.

So my wife can really contribute $6294 ($2294=employer and $4000=employee) to the SEP.

Deback (talk|edits) said:

January 21, 2007
Yes, an individual 401(k) has to be set up by 12/31/06 for 2006. I checked into this a few weeks ago for myself.

Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said:

21 January 2007
But why contribute to the traditional since the 4K will not be deductible because of AGI limits? Admittedly this puts all the money in the same place, but why not start as a Roth?


 As I read your first post, it seems she derives her income from your corporation, or am I reading this too broadly?  In that case, it might make sense to put her on payroll instead and contribute 25% of her pay to the company SEP in 2007, assuming you are not going to take advantage of the one person 401K for 2007.

RickCPA1 (talk|edits) said:

21 January 2007
Interesting and much needed discussion. Thank you to the knowledgeable posters.

I would appreciate someone reviewing this and letting me know if how I handled this is correct. If not what should I have done?

I am not sure I handled this correctly for 2004 and 2005. Let me explain 2005 because i was planning on doing 2006 same way.

I have 100% owner, age 60, sole owner and only employee of S corp that makes $200,000+/ year. Each year we do max W-2 for SS and also he wants to max contributions to retirement plans. Company has 401K + he has a SEP that is from when he was a sole proprietor. 2005 max contributions with catch up was $42000 + $4000 = $46000 W-2 was 90000 x .25 for profit sharing = -22500 Elective deferral 14000 + 4000 -18000 I put balance of $5500 on form 1040 line 28 SEP - 5500

Thank you for your help.

Rick

Bmcgin (talk|edits) said:

21 January 2007
This is my first time trying to file the S Corp and personal. My CPA retired. I am not comfortable filing myself. I used TaxCut, however I don’t fully understand depreciation and deductions. From what I’ve read in the forum, you guys are pros.

Anyone want to help? Please send an email with your fee.

The S corp is owned 100% by me, I w2 myself and my wife is paid as a sole proprietor through the corp. Our state is FL. I have clean books.

Email is brian@databaseknowledge.com

RickCPA1 (talk|edits) said:

21 January 2007
Interesting and much needed discussion. Thank you to the knowledgeable posters.

Sorry about the double post here but did not want to lose this question.

I would appreciate someone reviewing this and letting me know if how I handled this is correct. If not what should I have done?

I am not sure I handled this correctly for 2004 and 2005. Let me explain 2005 because i was planning on doing 2006 same way.

I have 100% owner, age 60, sole owner and only employee of S corp that makes $200,000+/ year. Each year we do max W-2 for SS and also he wants to max contributions to retirement plans. Company has 401K + he has a SEP that is from when he was a sole proprietor. 2005 max contributions with catch up was $42000 + $4000 = $46000 W-2 was 90000 x .25 for profit sharing = -22500 Elective deferral 14000 + 4000 -18000 I put balance of $5500 on form 1040 line 28 SEP - 5500

Thank you for your help.

Rick

Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said:

21 January 2007
Let's reserve the question as to whether he can use his Sch C SEP for this S Corp for others and concentrate on what you have. The 22500 is the 25% and goes on the line for pensions on the 1120S. He could have deferred 18K from his salary, giving total contribution of 40500. To get more, he would have had to take a higher salary.

RickCPA1 (talk|edits) said:

21 January 2007
Thank you D&T. Not what I wanted to see.

Thank you again. Rick

Teddybl (talk|edits) said:

28 January 2007
Great discussion. Additional question. S corp ,salary to 100% stockholder is 60000. S has paid the 15000 to SEP. Stockholder is 54. Can either the S or employee put an extra 5000 as catchup? If so, who pays and how is it deducted? thanks, Teddy

Sandysea (talk|edits) said:

28 January 2007
Nope...the SEP is tied strictly to wages and the employee does not fund the SEP

Bobbilipuli70 (talk|edits) said:

8 March 2007
Good discussion. Does anybody know what line item on 1120S need to be used to report the SEP-IRA contributions? I have an S-Corp with myself and my wife on W2. I am trying to contribute to SEP IRA for both of us but couldn't find where to report the deductions other than the broad term 1120S.

SunGod (talk|edits) said:

8 March 2007
Bobbilipuli70 - the company's portion (25% fo W2 wages) goes in line 17 of Form 1120S. Your contribution would come from deductions from your pay check.

Bobbilipuli70 (talk|edits) said:

8 March 2007
Thanks SunGod.

Just to confirm is line 17 used for all SEP-IRA cotributions to that given year including >2% shareholders right?

Also, my wife works for another company whcih offers 401k plan and she is contributing the max allowed amount to 401k at that company. Now, does she restricted to any SEP IRA contribution limit other than Wages * 25% or 44k?

Enalposi (talk|edits) said:

11 March 2007
Sorry but still a little confused how the S-Corp contributions are reported. Let's summarize:


1. An S-corp >2% owner (let's say 100%) makes 40k in W2. That means 25% = 10k can go into the SEP

2. All this is independent of dividend distributions, only W2 salary counts

3. Due to the >2% ownership the SEP contribution has to be reported/added to wages

4. SEP contributions go onto line 17 on from 1120S


Open questions:

1. How is it reported on the W2? Does it go into box 12 with some code?

2. Is it just ignored and intransparently rolled into the W2 salary?

3. Where is it listed on the 1040?

4. Does it mean one has to pay FICA on SEP contributions and lose out that way as a business owner?


Thanks!

JR1 (talk|edits) said:

March 11, 2007
1. y

2. y 3. N! Nothing to do with wages. 4. y

1. NA 2. ditto 3. ditto 4. ditto

Riley2 (talk|edits) said:

12 March 2007
A SEP contribution is not included in box 1, 3, or 5 of the W-2. Therefore, no FICA is paid on such conributions. My answer would change if you had a SARSEP.

RKoehler (talk|edits) said:

24 March 2007
Good afternoon all. I am brand new to this forum and have read every thread of this discussion. However, I am not sure I fully understand how to correct a specific situation.

I have a 100% shareholder $27,000 W-2 income Corp has $10,000 disbursement (directly to the shareholder) for SEP

OK, obviously too much! And is it necessary that the check be written to the financial institution where the SEP is held? How do I fix this mess? Thanks so much or any help!

Jdugancpa (talk|edits) said:

27 April 2007
Joe, I moved your question to a new thread. http://www.taxalmanac.org/index.php/Discussion:401K_w/_2_f/t_jobs

Johnhuddleston (talk|edits) said:

2 December 2007
The check should be written to the financial institution.

John Huddleston Seattle Bellevue Tax Accountant

Jrjo (talk|edits) said:

13 January 2008
Hello all, I am a 50% shareholder of an S Corp. with one consultant and I need to setup a retirement plan for myself and/or for both shareholders. My partner also working for a C corp (wages $120k/yr) and he has his own 401k plan through this company. I have looked at different plans like SEP-IRA, Solo 401K etc.. my partner would not be qulified for any of the plans. S Corp gross for 2007 was $250k, wages for each partner $27k, distribution for each $40k and consultant 1099 would be $100k. Thank you very much for any help!--Jrjo 04:23, 13 January 2008 (CST)

Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said:

13 January 2008
You raise an interesting question, since the Solo 401K obviously gives you the best results. Is it really true that the company cannot set up a Solo 401K? I realize your partner cannot contribute, but since you will only be deducting your contribution from your wages, once that is done the profit sharing amount will be equal between partners.

And what is this 'consultant 1099?' That does not sound kosher.

JR1 (talk|edits) said:

January 13, 2008
And he would qualify for a SEP. That has no bearing on his coverage elsewhere.

Uncle Sam (talk|edits) said:

13 January 2008
I'm still somewhat confused after all this discussion.

I have a 100% S Corp shareholder (only corporation employee) that setup a SEP-IRA starting 2008. Is it an employee deferral like a 401(k) and SIMPLE where employee defers portion of salary that reduces gross salary - where FICA and Medicare withholding is based on gross before deferral - FWT and SWT based on after deferral; corporation shows -0- pension expense, or

Is the employee taxed on gross for all the withholding taxes, and the corporation take a 100% expense deduction for the contributon?

I know that for 2008 - it's salary x 25%; limit contribution is $ 46,000. This particular client will never hit the limit.

Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said:

13 January 2008
"Is the employee taxed on gross for all the withholding taxes, and the corporation take a 100% expense deduction for the contributon?" That is your answer.....the benefit is that if the man makes 100,000K before salary, you might schedule his salary at 80K and put 20K in the SEP, deducted as a pension contribution on the 1120S [but naturally you might have to allow for Employer FICA.

There is a pretty good discussion here: http://www.individual401k.com/sep_ira/

JR1 (talk|edits) said:

January 13, 2008
Yeah, a SEP is 100% employER contribution, so the deferral limits don't apply.

Jrjo (talk|edits) said:

13 January 2008
Are you saying my partner in our S-Corp can have a 401k in a C corp where he works as an employee and also have a SEP-IRA with an S-Corp?

I thought Solo 401k is for S-Corp with one owner only. We report the consultant compensation on 1099 Misc. He sets his hours and place to work and he is responsible for paying his taxes.

Uncle Sam (talk|edits) said:

13 January 2008
Thanks D&T and JR1.

That's just what I needed to know for setting up a SEP for a SubS (100% shareholder-only employee) client. Wanted to set it up and to it right.

Renbent (talk|edits) said:

4 March 2008
Help!! I am trying to help a friend with her taxes. She is the president and sole employee of an S corp. Her S corp has contributed $8000 to her Sep ira. The S corp deducted this on the proper line on her 1120s and not on her w2. She wrote a check personally for $15000 to her Sep ira. She received wages of $57000 from this S corp. When I try to put this in Turbo tax it does not give her a tax deduction for the $15000 on her 1040. When I add the $1200 she received from a MLM company and deduct the expenses of this venture-Turbo tax then deducts $30 for her $15000 contribution because of her $600 or so net business profits on a schedule c. Where should her contribution be inputed on the tax return? Should she use the 1099 msc as wages and not deduct the expense so turbo tax does not create a schedule c? Will this help?

Kevinh5 (talk|edits) said:

4 March 2008
hi, if you are using Turbo Tax, you need to go to their website to ask your question - this forum is for professional (paid) tax preparers. If you are depending on the software then you need to do more research. We are not here to teach people how to use software. Good luck.

Jdugancpa (talk|edits) said:

4 March 2008
Renbent, I agree with Kevin, we can't help you figure it out on TurboTax (TT is not a product used by professional tax preparers). But here is a hint. A Solo401K and a SEP are not the same beast. It appears to me you are confusing the two. You may want to consider consulting with a professional tax preparer. (Somebody got chewed out recently for such a "trolling for client" suggestion, so lest anyone think otherwise, find someone local to your area so that I cannot be accused of being a troll).

I'll bet you Rabaty never realized in asking the question at the top of this thread that he would be immortalized and people would be looking to his question ever after.

Renbent (talk|edits) said:

4 March 2008
Hi to all, I was looking for help in a certain area that I am not familiar with. I am an accountant with a degree but had to postpone my career for the last 10 years to help my out with my husbands business. Forgot the turbo tax part of the question. What I really need is to understand is where to put this deduction and if it is deductible? After reading the IRS rules I am even more confused. She has also put $4000 in a roth ira.

Please read the whole question. Thanks in advance to anyone who might help!!

Renbent (talk|edits) said:

4 March 2008
To add to the above question: I checked out some previous answers to questions on this site. It looks like she wasn't allowed to make the $15000 contribution personally to her Sep ira. The S corp contributed $8000 which I believe the s corp could of contributed 25% of her w2 income which was $14250. Am I on the right track?

Jdugancpa (talk|edits) said:

4 March 2008
Yes,

Silverknightlv (talk|edits) said:

12 March 2008
Our S-Corp has three owners (two of whom have other jobs as well but no retirement plan). Do all owners have to participate with their own employee/owner salary deferrals and does the company have to make tax-deductible profit sharing contributions to each employee and if so, is it in the same amount or by percentage of ownership?

JR1 (talk|edits) said:

March 12, 2008
It depends on the plan. Rules are different for SEP's and SIMPLE's. Edward Jones just published a new brochure on retirement plans for small biz. Get ahold of an Ed Jones guy, they're a super outfit to work with, and get one.

Silverknightlv (talk|edits) said:

12 March 2008
Sorry...my fault. I should have mentioned that this was in regard to a Solo 401(k). If I understand correctly, each owner/employee can decide what, if any, contribution they wish to make. If the company does profit sharing, it is by percentage of salary and not percentage of ownership.

Jdugancpa (talk|edits) said:

12 March 2008
I don't believe an S corp with 3 owners is eligible to have a Solo 401k. Only businesses with single owner/spouse are eligible. Without researching I don't believe an S corp may have separate retirement plans for its separate owners. If some owners don't want to participate, look into a SIMPLE which would allow each owner to defer $10,500 ($13,000 for over 50) plus a Company match of up to 3% for those who choose to participate. Too late, however, for 2007, must have in place before year end (10/1 I think).

Steph (talk|edits) said:

17 March 2008
Hello,

I have two separate SEP questions - I apologize in advance if it's not proper etiquette to put two scenarios in one post :)

1. I have a new client who had a Schedule C until the middle of 2006 - at which point he started an S-Corp for that business. He had a SEP in his name for the Schedule C. In 2007 he made contributions to the SEP out of the S-Corp. In 2007 he also had employees for the first time. Questions - is there a legal requirement to change the SEP to the S-corp? I plan on putting the deduction on the S - I'm more concerned about whether or not he needs to file a new 5305-SEP. If he does so, and sets it up so employees have to have worked 3 out of 5 years - does his years of service as a Schedule C filer somehow come into play? In other words can he qualify without his new employees qualifying?

2. I have a self employed individual who also has an S-Corp. and is the only employee. He has had a SEP for the schedule C for years and no retimrement plan for the S-Corp. This year the Schedule C will not have much income - is there any reason he can't have a SEP for the S-Corp and fund that one this year (understanding that the funding will need to come from the S-Corp).

Many thanks for your help!

Steph (talk|edits) said:

17 March 2008
Hello,

I have two separate SEP questions - I apologize in advance if it's not proper etiquette to put two scenarios in one post :)

1. I have a new client who had a Schedule C until the middle of 2006 - at which point he started an S-Corp for that business. He had a SEP in his name for the Schedule C. In 2007 he made contributions to the SEP out of the S-Corp. In 2007 he also had employees for the first time. Questions - is there a legal requirement to change the SEP to the S-corp? I plan on putting the deduction on the S - I'm more concerned about whether or not he needs to file a new 5305-SEP. If he does so, and sets it up so employees have to have worked 3 out of 5 years - does his years of service as a Schedule C filer somehow come into play? In other words can he qualify without his new employees qualifying?

2. I have a self employed individual who also has an S-Corp. and is the only employee. He has had a SEP for the schedule C for years and no retimrement plan for the S-Corp. This year the Schedule C will not have much income - is there any reason he can't have a SEP for the S-Corp and fund that one this year (understanding that the funding will need to come from the S-Corp).

Many thanks for your help!

Kevinh5 (talk|edits) said:

17 March 2008
2 will be based on his W-2 from the S corp

Steph (talk|edits) said:

17 March 2008
No problem there as he does have 100k W-2 - I just wanted to make sure I wasn't missing any rule that somehow prohibited him from having an individual SEP and a SEP through his S-Corp.

Thanks for the response!

Xavier (talk|edits) said:

18 July 2008
Hello,

I have a client with an S-corp who failed to file tax returns for several years in a row (he paid estimated taxes though). He did, however, create an IRA account and a SEP account with an online brokerage. The problem is, he didn't pay himself any salary.

We calculated that if he paid enough salary to justify his SEP contribution, his additional self-employment and social security taxes would be greater than the deduction he'd get for the SEP.

So we advised him not to take the SEP (or IRA) as deductions. First of all, do you agree with this, and secondly, what should he do with those accounts which still exist in his online brokerage?

I had suggested that he immediately close the accounts, and explain to the IRS if they ask, that he had never claimed them. Is this what you'd recommend?

Thanks!

Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said:

18 July 2008
Am I the only person a bit confused here?

1. He has an S Corp, but has not filed which returns, the S Corp or the individual or both?

2. He paid estimated taxes for the individual?

3. He set up and funded a SEP? In which name? If he was an employee of the corporation, the SEP had to be in the corporate name and deducted there.

4. Self employment tax? You mean he paid himself on a 1099 or the like and did not file payroll taxes?

5. And if I get the drift, you are advising him not to show salary or Schedule C income on his personal return, but to pick up the S Corp income on Sch E and not pay Social Security.

Now if I have this straight, and he follows your course, he owes Excise taxes for making contributions for each year the money was put in the IRA and SEP when he had no earned income. (You cannot claim the IRAs were non-deductible unless he has other earned income to qualify him for the contribution.)

I would not recomment this course, assuming I have read you correctly, but rather pay the SE tax and take the SEP deduction, and IRA deduction if his income is low enough....if not, treat the IRAs as a non-deductible contribution.

Your use of the editorial "We," and your lack of a profile, suggests that the 'we' is you. If not, my apologies but your client has made his bed, so he should sleep in it.

Kbo4545 (talk|edits) said:

5 August 2008
I have a MMLLC(3 owners/mngr's) which has elected S-Corp status. I want to open a SEP-IRA account, but the other two do not. Am I able to do this? Also, I already have a traditional IRA...can I still contribute to that account?

Thanks

Interestedtax (talk|edits) said:

16 February 2009
Help appreciated. Im a 100 owner S-Corp.

I didn't indicate my SEP IRA checks from my S-Corp. Income flowed through to my personal taxes as income in K-1. Can I deduct my SEP IRA contributions on my personal taxes without redoing my S-Corp and or W2?

Thank you in advance.

Rcmcfe (talk|edits) said:

9 March 2009
Got a question...

I'm the sole shareholder of an S-Corp. During the year (2008) I paid myself a salary and the Corporation made contributions to my SEP. THe contribution were less than the limits allowed. I've filed my W2 already, but have not filed my corporate or individual tax returns yet.

My question is, can the corporation made an additional contribution to my SEP for tax year 2008?

Thanks in advance.

To join in on this discussion, you must first log in.