Discussion:Personal residence transferred to limited partnership

From TaxAlmanac, A Free Online Resource for Tax Professionals
Note: You are using this website at your own risk, subject to our Disclaimer and Website Use and Contribution Terms.

From TaxAlmanac

Jump to: navigation, search

Discussion Forum Index --> Tax Questions --> Personal residence transferred to limited partnership

TaxNerd (talk|edits) said:

19 June 2007
I have a client who transferred his personal residence to a limited partnership and now wants to sell. I told him I didn't think he could take the section 121 exclusion. I told him he could transfer the house to his name and then wait two years, but I thought the transfer would be considered a deemed sale, and the partnership would have to report a gain on the appreciation since it took title. Any ideas or suggestions, or something I'm missing? I know this is similar to discussion below - sorry for starting a new thread.

Tdh555 (talk|edits) said:

20 June 2007
I believe you are correct on no Sec 121. However, the transfer of property out of the ltd ptshp should not be a sale; just a transfer of adjusted basis to a partner (gain realized on subsequent sale).

Diz (talk|edits) said:

20 June 2007
Treas. Reg. 1-121-1(c)(3)(ii) says that single owner entities that are disregared for tax purposes get the exclusion. I had wondered if an H&W owned entity would qualify, but, in any event, no exclusion.

How long has the residence been in the LP, though? If it were 3 years or less could he still claim the exlusion on the sale, assuming the LP transferred it back to him, based on Treas. Reg. 1-121-1(c)(1).

TaxNerd (talk|edits) said:

20 June 2007
Unfortunately, husband and wife own the partnership 50-50 (well, 49-49 with 2% going to general partner) and the house has been in P/S over three years, but thanks muchly for the advice.

Kevinh5 (talk|edits) said:

20 June 2007
Why would anyone want to "donate" their residence to a 2% unrelated general partner?

Dennis (talk|edits) said:

20 June 2007
General Partner would typically be a family controlled Corp.

Kevinh5 (talk|edits) said:

20 June 2007
Thanks. If that is the case (residence is now owned by a business entity, not a disregarded entity), how can the argument be made that it would qualify for §121? A business entity doesn't have a "residence" which qualifies for §121.

To join in on this discussion, you must first log in.