Discussion:Overdraft Fees Not Deductible

From TaxAlmanac, A Free Online Resource for Tax Professionals
Note: You are using this website at your own risk, subject to our Disclaimer and Website Use and Contribution Terms.

From TaxAlmanac

Jump to: navigation, search

Discussion Forum Index --> Basic Tax Questions --> Overdraft Fees Not Deductible
Discussion Forum Index --> Tax Questions --> Overdraft Fees Not Deductible

Cobbcpa (talk|edits) said:

10 September 2009
IRS auditor disallowed bank overdraft fees for a business bank account. Said the IRS opinion is that overdraft fees are the result of poor business management. If the overdraft can be traced to a client, such as the result of a bad check, the overdraft fees would be deductible. Otherwise, the Service considers them to be similar to penalties.

It's not a large amount, but I've seen clients getting hit with high fees, especially as they try to stay afloat in this economy. Thought they were deductible. Any thoughts?

Kevinh5 (talk|edits) said:

10 September 2009
ordinary and necessary doesn't mean that the person made every choice correctly. Do you think the folks at AIG had good business management? But they get to deduct all of their expenses just the same. I'd fight for this one.

Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said:

10 September 2009
Take it up with his or her manager, and ask for a cite in writing where you can find IRS' opinion. I won't comment on 'poor management' being not deductible; it is too ridiculous.

JR1 (talk|edits) said:

September 10, 2009
Give me a break. It's always something.

Southparkcpa (talk|edits) said:

10 September 2009
Another auditor with a personal axe to grind. Their personal view is now case law.... just ask them.

Simply ridiculous.

Waynecpa (talk|edits) said:

10 September 2009
Well, if this is the case, some of my clients will be missing out on a $5,000 deduction for their poor business management. Granted the fees shouldn't happen, but I can't think of a reason they aren't a cost of doing business (poorly). I want to see the cite of the IRS position also.

Captcook (talk|edits) said:

10 September 2009
Aren't overdraft fees actually charges for unapproved loans from the bank? The business needed the money to operate and didn't have available cash on hand, thus the loan from the bank. As all loans, this loan had loan fees. The loan was for such a short amount of time; no interest was charged. The loan fee was properly amortized over the life of the loan (1-3days). Why would this not be a deduction?

Tpasco (talk|edits) said:

10 September 2009
Also, the fees can be seen as the cost of short-term credit. A high cost, mind you, but not every business owner has the ability to borrow.

I just met with an auditor, the client's bank account showed deposits of 1.4M and he declared 800K of income. It's obvious to me that the client is simply putting draws back into the business account when checks bounce(ahem, due to the many cash withdrawals, subsequent checks bouncing for insufficient funds and corrective deposits). So of course the auditor says that unless we can prove the deposits are "recycled" using bank records, she will treat the excess deposits as unreported income. Argh. I can prove some of it by getting bank records of deposited items, but if it's cash all I have is client testimony which apparently is insufficient. Anybody have a creative way to deal with this? Or case law?

Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said:

10 September 2009
Am I reading this correctly, Tpasco? He writes a business check to himself, cashes it and then has to put the cash back into the account. I can't remember if this is kiting or simply stupidity, but if he uses one branch, and if they still like him as a customer, maybe he can get a letter from them.

Also, copies of his deposit tickets would show the money being cash.

Tpasco (talk|edits) said:

10 September 2009
Death & Taxes,that's correct. I actually think it's a case of 'country' more than stupidity. The client has an eighth-grade education, likes to use cash, and is not a very good record-keeper (though apparently quite a good contractor judging by his income). Unfortunately, his business also gets paid with cash sometimes, which muddies the water. He has a skillful but elderly tax preparer (85 yrs), who is evidently less alarmed by sketchy business records than I would be - I have all expense receipts but the income records are practically nonexistent. The client has made a practice of keeping a monthly list of payments. At the end of each month he writes the total income in an account book and throws his list away. So all I have is the monthly gross.

His deposit tickets don't specify cash or checks, but I think we can get the information from the bank, and also trace all the deposited checks to determine whether they are from personal accounts or from customers.

Natalie (talk|edits) said:

September 10, 2009
Tpasco, what about contracts? They should be able to substantiate a good portion of the income.

Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said:

10 September 2009
The bank's deposit ticket usually has a top line for cash, meaning that money is available almost immediately. Whether they keep copies or records is another matter.

I once took money from one account at Commerce Bank here and deposited in another joint account. I asked the teller when it would be available and she replied 'tomorrow.' When I went to get a bank check on the second account that next day, it was not available and would not be for five days because I entered it as a check deposit. I was a little ticked off. Needless to say, when I opened a corporate account, and a joint account with my wife, we went across the street to the small Savings bank there.

Kevinh5 (talk|edits) said:

10 September 2009
ummmmm, D&T, if you needed cash the next day, why would you deposit it in the bank the day before? Do you live in a bad neighborhood or something?

Kevinh5 (talk|edits) said:

10 September 2009
tounge firmly in cheek

Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said:

10 September 2009
As I said, we needed a bank draft on our joint account to pay off my wife's 401K loan.....her employer insisted she pay it off when she left employment. (I asked them who would sue her if she didn't? Herself?) It never dawned on me that the money could get lost for five days going from account A to account B in the same bank.

Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said:

10 September 2009
And before we rip this auditor a new one, consider all the 'professionals' who insist you can or can't deduct something and who are totally wrong. This includes me at times, but my favorite was the tax lawyer in 1984 who told a client she could not income average more than one year in a row.

Cobbcpa (talk|edits) said:

11 September 2009
Thanks for all the postings. We'll probably let the auditor have this one, as it's small and will help us in the long run. But it was fun to read the logic for overdraft fees being quasi-short term loans. And your reactions.

Good luck, Tpasco.

Harry Boscoe (talk|edits) said:

11 September 2009
And fun also to hear that IRS considers overdraft fees nondeductible "similar to penalties".

Sad, however, that the agent will go to her next audit thinking that the fees are nondeductible...

Kevinh5 (talk|edits) said:

11 September 2009
not knowing the full impact or what else the auditor may disagree with or what other bodies might be buried in the taxpayer's returns, it's also sad that the taxpayer will overpay his taxes due to his representative not being more zealous.

Cobbcpa (talk|edits) said:

11 September 2009
I do feel the guilt. The client thinks I've been way overzealous in making him prepare. It's a only a $25 deduction, so is small. No dead bodies, just some we'd rather let sleep for several long years. But based on your comments, I'll ask for a cite to make a point.

Kevinh5 (talk|edits) said:

11 September 2009
now I feel like William Shatner in those "Priceline Negotiator" commercials

Kevinh5 (talk|edits) said:

11 September 2009
maybe the 'tough love' commercial illustrates this better

Harry Boscoe (talk|edits) said:

11 September 2009
We went through all this for a $25 deduction? It's noon, it's Friday, and I don't need any excuse to go to the fridge. Who'll join me?

Jerrykern (talk|edits) said:

11 September 2009
As it is after 12:00 on the East coast, I've already got my hat with two cans in it, siphon running.

Kevinh5 (talk|edits) said:

11 September 2009
William Shatner would not think $25 was too low to stoop.

Trillium (talk|edits) said:

11 September 2009
If the agent is positive that "penalties" are never deductible, ask her what line 30 on the 1040 is for, then? (After all, early withdrawal of a CD would be poor personal investment management, i.e., an exact corollary to poor business practice - although I must say, for $25 it isn't necessarily a bad business decision to go into overdraft now and then)

NYea (talk|edits) said:

11 September 2009
Cobb

Sometimes, principles are important!!! Fight for the $25 deduction.  :)

The deductibility of these charges might be dependent on the "size" of these fees.

One court case where the IRS prevailed on this was Bailey TC Memo 1991-385. Here is the headnote:

[start] Bank charges on overdrafts. Business expense deduction for bank charges on overdrafts was denied. Charges weren't proven to be ordinary or necessary to taxpayers' laundry and dry cleaning business or that such high amount of charges were normal, usual, or customary in taxpayers' business. Nor were charges deductible as interest for short-term loans[end]

Bailey had overdraft fees of $30K - deemed not ordinary & necessary. (Yes, that was $30,000 - not $25). Size was controlling.

In Grover, TCS 2008-64, the IRS sought to deny about $3,500 of these fees. The judge ruled otherwise. He cited Bailey but noted the fees were due to a lack of business acumen and were about 10% of what Bailey sought to deduct. While Summary cases can not be cited as precedent, show the case to the auditor and ask him/her what are the chances an Appeals Officer would sustain the disallowance of a $25 deduction????

Most small businesses occur these charges routinely. Unless, they were way out of line, I think they are ordinary & necessary.

LH2004 (talk|edits) said:

September 11, 2009
Wow. $30,000 per year for 2 years in a row, and then they managed to cut it to $6000 the third year.

"Petitioners were permitted to overdraw their Coastal Bank accounts as long as the amounts overdrawn were covered by deposits on the same day the overdraft occurred. Petitioners have not explained why they did not make deposits to cover checks written before they were presented. If they had the cash available to cover the checks, they could have avoided the bank charges. Petitioners' real reason for engaging in this peculiar pattern of conduct is undisclosed but, on the basis of the entire record, we cannot conclude that petitioners derived no personal benefit from their conduct or that the business nature of the payments made the bank charges ordinary and necessary." I think there always has to be some concern like that for a deduction to be denied on ordinary-and-necessary grounds.

J-k (talk|edits) said:

19 November 2009
Hi,

I'm sure this is too late to help you but have you seen page 40 on pub 334.

Under other expenses you can deduct it lists "Bank Fees".

http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p334.pdf - IRS PUB 334 Tax Guide For Small Business

I hope this helps someone. Let us know the outcome.

CountingSheep (talk|edits) said:

19 November 2009
In my humble opinion, as we see more giveaways like cash for cluckers etc, we are going to see more shakedowns like this. Another example is the $89 fee for late filed S-Corp.s. I just recieved a fax from a client sending a bill from the IRS. We filed an extension on time but I will bet they are just sending these out hoping someone just cuts loose with a check. Or at least it seems like we are seeing more shakedown attempts. I know, I know, correlation does not prove causation.

IDrinkYour Milkshake (talk|edits) said:

19 November 2009
When I used to work for someone, I saw a S-Corp client have over $3K of NSF fees rules as not deductible. This was due to him kiting the checks. IRS deemed it to be personal, not corporate, actions that led to the fee. I quit the firm before they appealed.

To join in on this discussion, you must first log in.