Discussion:Are tax returns required for an LLC that has not started to conduct business?

From TaxAlmanac, A Free Online Resource for Tax Professionals
Note: You are using this website at your own risk, subject to our Disclaimer and Website Use and Contribution Terms.

From TaxAlmanac

Jump to: navigation, search

Discussion Forum Index --> Basic Tax Questions --> Are tax returns required for an LLC that has not started to conduct business?
Discussion Forum Index --> Tax Questions --> Are tax returns required for an LLC that has not started to conduct business?

Mathmonk (talk|edits) said:

7 March 2009
Are tax returns required for an LLC

which has been elected to be taxed as a partnership that has not started to conduct business, and thereby has no income?

For state returns in Delaware, it doesn't appear required: http://revenue.delaware.gov/services/current_pit/TY08_300i.pdf A PARTNERSHIP RETURN MUST BE COMPLETED BY ANY BUSINESS TREATED AS A PARTNERSHIP FOR FEDERAL PURPOSES WHICH HAS ANY INCOME OR LOSS, REGARDLESS OF AMOUNT, DERIVED FROM OR CONNECTED WITH A DELAWARE SOURCE. IF THE PARTNERSHIP HAS NO DELAWARE SOURCED INCOME OR LOSS, NO RETURN IS REQUIRED TO BE FILED UNLESS YOU HAVE DELAWARE RESIDENT PARTNERS.

And the instructions for IRS 1065 state under domestic partnerships, http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/i1065.pdf "Except as provided below, every domestic partnership must file Form 1065, unless it neither receives income nor incurs any expenditures treated as deductions or credits for federal income tax purposes."

But it also states: "Entities formed as LLCs that are classified as partnerhips for federal income tax purposes must file Form 1065."

How would you interpret the last line? Is it merely pointing out that LLCs classified as partnerships should use Form 1065? Or is it trying to state that all LLCs, regardless of whether it receives income, should file Form 1065?

Lizzit (talk|edits) said:

7 March 2009
If it was created during 2008, there were legal costs, incorporation costs, etc. It had no income, but it sure as heck had some expenses. I'd file a return.

Lizzit

Mathmonk (talk|edits) said:

7 March 2009
Based on the fairly low expenses of this particular client in 2008,

and their concern about becoming profitable within 3 years, I would like to advise them to avoid the hassle of dealing with the not-for-profit test in IRS 535. They do believe they can achieve profitability in time, but have concerns about the near future, especially given the current economic climate.

Harry Boscoe (talk|edits) said:

7 March 2009
Well, there's twist! "Except for an undue concern about the near-future state of the American and worldwide economy, every partnership with either income or expenses is required to file a tax return."

Do you mind if I howl for a bit? LOL

But seriously, did any part of the LLC/partnership's business activity begin this year? If so, there's a deemed election, I think, to deduct and maybe also amortize start-up expenditures, which becomes an "expense" - I think - that requires the filing of a return, I think, for the year, I think. Beginning business is very hard to define - may thus indirectly require that a return be filed. And the statement that said that LLC/partnership should file Form 1065 was saying just that: they should use Form 1065 *if* they're required to file and do file a return.

DbK14 (talk|edits) said:

7 March 2009
If the activity was so minimal, why not just avoid the potential hassle and file?

Mathmonk (talk|edits) said:

7 March 2009
Hi DbK14,

The reason why it may be better to NOT file a tax return is that there is a very high probability that my client will fail the presumption of profit test within the first 3 years. It may be more hassle dealing with a potential audit than not filing, especially if my client is willing to pass on deducting a few hundred dollars for tax year 2008. (Not filing would only make sense, of course, if he could properly define the start of his business to when he starts selling his product.) It would buy my client an extra year to start making a profit, and hopefully start passing the presumption of profit test from the 4th year onwards. I know the profit test isn't a hard and fast one, but who wants to deal with proving that to the IRS?

"Presumption of profit. An activity is presumed carried on for profit if it produced a profit in at least 3 of the last 5 tax years, including the current year." 535

"Beginning business is very hard to define - may thus indirectly require that a return be filed. And the statement that said that LLC/partnership should file Form 1065 was saying just that: they should use Form 1065 *if* they're required to file and do file a return." Thanks Harry.

Mathmonk (talk|edits) said:

7 March 2009
Harry,

There was no attempt to start selling the product in 2008, because there was no product to sell. There were no employees, just 2 partner/members in the LLC. Since there is no product to sell, and active development has not started on the product, the only costs that this team incurred was the cost to start up the LLC and the registered agent fees. Therefore, there was no income. This team hopes to being actively development on the product this year, and start selling their product in 2 years.

Regarding the following lines:

Harry: "Well, there's twist!"

IRS: "every domestic partnership must file Form 1065, unless it neither receives income nor incurs any expenditures treated as deductions or credits for federal income tax purposes."

I would interpret 1065 to mean that if you received income, you are, of course, required to file. However, I would interpret "... incurs any expenditures treated as deductions or credits" to mean that, if you're willing to pass on taking advantage of any deductions, haven't made any income, and haven't started to try to make a profit yet, then you are not required to file.

Again, there was no income, or attempt to try to make any kind of profit this year. Failing presumption of profit would be more of a hassle than not filing, I think.

Any thoughts?

Sandysea (talk|edits) said:

7 March 2009
Yes, Math but I think this goes with every other deduction like depreciation...you can't forego expenditures that you are ALLOWED to take in order to make life easier in the long run....

Deback (talk|edits) said:

March 7, 2009
What was the beginning date entered on Form SS-4, when the LLC was formed? If 2008, file a return, even if all zeros. If 2009, don't file a 2008 return.

Kevinh5 (talk|edits) said:

7 March 2009
also note that many states have a fee or filing obligation, even if there is no obligation on the Federal side.

Harry Boscoe (talk|edits) said:

7 March 2009
The regs at section 1.6031 talk about the partnership having income or deductions. They don't even mention "doing business" or "having sales" and such.

What's the per month per partner penalty these days for not filing a required partnership tax return? But I'm not saying this one is required, ok?

Mathmonk (talk|edits) said:

7 March 2009
Hi Kevinh5,

Yes, my client paid the $250 Delaware LLC tax for 2009. As the Delaware LLC was formed in January 2008, the Delaware LLC tax did not apply in the year of formation.

Hi Sandysea, Deback, and Harry,

If it is legally required to file (ie. if my client is legally REQUIRED to deduct allowed expenses), then I will indeed inform my client that filing for 2008 is necessary, regardless of an absence of income or attempt to make a profit in 2008. They may have to deal with the presumption of profit under 535 at a later point, but if filing is required, then they have no choice.

Deback (talk|edits) said:

March 7, 2009
I think you're too worried about the company not showing a profit for 2008. Isn't that concern mainly for hobby type of businesses?

Mathmonk (talk|edits) said:

7 March 2009
Hi Deback,

I wouldn't be concerned that the company didn't show a profit for 2008, if the company was certain to start making a profit in 2010. However, I am concerned that if the company doesn't show a profit in 2010, 2011, and 2012, then they will fail the presumption of profit test in 535, and face the possibility of an audit to retain for-profit status.

Harry Boscoe (talk|edits) said:

7 March 2009
If they run their business like a business, it's not going to "flunk" the hobby loss criteria. And anyway, the "presumption" runs in the other direction, in the taxpayer's favor, so even if it's flunked, the proper-appearing business motive will defeat the not-for-profit demons...

Sandysea (talk|edits) said:

7 March 2009
BUT if they have a business purpose and they indeed INTEND to make a profit by virtue of what they are attempting, I don't think you will have a problem.

The INTENT needs to be there.

But again, I emphasize that we can't just decide NOT to deduct things that should be deducted to save on future exposure...imho that is :)

Blrgcpa (talk|edits) said:

7 March 2009
If the LLC has an EIN, the IRS will look for a tax return.

Mathmonk (talk|edits) said:

7 March 2009
Hi Blrgcpa,

> If the LLC has an EIN, the IRS will look for a tax return. > Thank you. The answer is clear then. I'll advise my client to file.

Hi Harry and Sandysea,

Thanks. Its good to know that showing a profit motive is easy.

To join in on this discussion, you must first log in.
Personal tools